Quasi-asymptotic development of conditioned hyperactivity induced by intermittent injections of cocaine in C57BL/6J mice

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 273-280

  Brabant, Christian ^a   Tambour, Sophie ^a   Tirelli, Ezio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

C57BL 6J mice; Cocaine; Conditioned drug effects; Excitatory conditioning theory of sensitisation; Placebo response

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; HYPERACTIVITY; HYPERKINESIA; IATROGENIC DISEASE; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REINFORCEMENT; SENSITIZATION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 0038784684     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(03)00083-2     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams J.U., Careri J.M., Efferen T.R., Rotrosen J. Conditioned locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats do not result from interference with habituation. Psychopharmacology. 151:2000;13-18.
2. Ader R. The role of conditioning in pharmacotherapy. Harrington A. The placebo effect. 1997;138-165 Harvard University Press, London.
3. Ahmed S.H., Cador M., Le Moal M., Stinus L. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity in rats: comparison with novelty-induced activity and role of the basolateral amygdala. Behav. Neurosci. 109:1995;723-733.
4. Ahmed S.H., Oberling P., Di Scala G., Sandner G. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty. Psychopharmacology. 123:1996;325-332.
5. Anastognoras S.G., Robinson T.E. Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning. Behav. Neurosci. 110:1996;1397-1414.
6. Badiani A., Anastognoras S.G., Robinson T.E. The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment. Psychopharmacology. 117:1995;443-452.
7. Battisti J.J., Uretsky N.J., Wallace L.J. Importance of environmental context in the development of ampheta. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 66:2000;671-677.
8. Beninger R.J., Hahn B.L. Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science. 220:1983;1304-1306.
9. Cabib S. Strain-dependent behavioural sensitisation to amphetamine: role of environmental influences. Behav. Pharmacol. 4:1993;367-374.
10. Carey R., Gui J. Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship? Behav. Brain Res. 92:1998;67-76.
11. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Maren S., Robinson T.E. The role of contextual versus discrete drug-associated cues in promoting the induction of psychomotor sensitization to intravenous amphetamine. Behav. Brain Res. 116:2000;1-22.
12. Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Chan J., Dell'Orco J., Dineen S.P., Robinson T.E. The ability of environmental context to facilitate psychomotor sensitization to amphetamine can be dissociated from its effect on acute drug responsiveness and on conditioned responding. Neuropsychopharmacology. 24:2001;680-690.
13. Cunningham C. Pavlovian drug conditioning. Van Haaren F. Methods in behavioral pharmacology. 1993;349-381 Elsevier, New York.
14. Damianopoulos E.N., Carey R.J. Conditioning, habituation and behavioral reorganization factors in chronic cocaine effects. Behav. Brain Res. 49:1992;149-157.
15. Devries A.C., Pert A. Conditioned increases in anxiogenic-like behavior following exposure to contextual stimuli associated with cocaine are mediated by corticotropin-releasing factor. Psychopharmacology. 137:1998;333-340.
16. Domjan M. The principles of learning and behavior. 4th ed. 1998;Cole Publishing, Austin.
17. Drew K.L., Glick S.D. Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment dependent placebo-like response. Psychopharmacology (Berl.). 95:1988;482-487.
18. Estes K. Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychol. Rev. 62:1955;369-377.
19. Fraioli S., Crombag H.S., Badiani A., Robinson T.E. Susceptibility to amphetamine-induced locomotor sensitization is modulated by environmental stimuli. Neuropsychopharmacology. 20:1999;533-541.
20. Glaser R.E. Levene's robust test of homogeneity of variances. Kotz S., Johnson N.L., Read C.B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 1983;608-610 Wiley, New York.
21. Gold L.H., Koob G.F. MDMA produces stimulant-like conditioned activity. Psychopharmacology. 99:1989;352-356.
22. Hayashi T., Ohashi K., Tadokoro S. Conditioned drug effects to d-amphetamine and morphine-induced motor acceleration in mice: experimental approach for placebo effect. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 30:1980;93-100.
23. Herz R.S., Beninger R.J. Comparison of the ability of (+)-amphetamine and caffeine to produce environment-specific conditioning. Psychopharmacology. 92:1987;365-370.
24. Hoffman D.C., Wise R.A. Locomotor-activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology. 1992;107-115.
25. Kehoe E.J., Macrae M. Fundamental behavioral methods and findings. Moore J.W. A neuroscientist's guide to classical conditioning. 2002;138-165 Springer-Verlag, New York.
26. Kiyatkin E.A. State-dependent peculiarities of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and their possible reasons. Intern. J. Neurosci. 67:1992;93-103.
27. Kuribara H. Effects of postmethamphetamine treatment with restraint on ambulatory sensitization to methamphetamine in mice. Brain Res. Bull. 43:1997;97-100.
28. Martin-Iverson M.T., Fawcett S.L. Pavlovian conditioning of psychomotor stimulant-induced behaviours: has convenience led us astray? Behav. Pharmacol. 7:1996;24-41.
29. Mattingly B.A., Gotsick J.E. Conditioning and experiential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav. Neurosci. 103:1989;1311-1317.
30. Mattingly B.A., Himmler C., Bonta T., Rice L.T.L. Effects of selective dopamine D1- and D2-type receptor antagonists on the development of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT. Psychopharmacology. 140:1998;387-397.
31. Mattingly B.A., Rice L.L., Langfels M., Fields S.E. Repeated treatments with 7-OH-DPAT: context-independent behavioral sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 65:2000;241-246.
32. Mazurski E.J., Beninger R.J. Effects of selective drugs for dopaminergic D1 and D2 receptors on conditioned locomotion in rats. Psychopharmacology. 105:1991;107-112.
33. Michel A., Tirelli E. Conditioned hyperkinesia induced by cocaine in mice is dose-dependent but not correlated with the unconditioned response or the contextually-sensitized response. Behav. Pharmacol. 13:2002;59-71.
34. Michel A., Tirelli E. Post-sensitization conditioned hyperlocomotion induced by cocaine is augmented as a function of dose in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 132:2002;79-86.
35. Michel A., Tambour S., Tirelli E. The magnitude and the speed of extinction of cocaine-induced conditioned locomotion are determined by the number of cocaine injections paired with the test context in C57BL/6J mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2003;. [in press].
36. Mucha R.F., Volkovskis C., Kalant H. Conditioned increases in locomotor activity produced with morphine as an unconditioned stimulus, and the relation of conditioning to acute morphine effect and tolerance. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 95:1981;351-362.
37. Pickens R.W., Crowder W.F. Effects of CS-US interval on conditioning of drug response, with assessment of speed of conditioning. Psychopharmacologia. 11:1967;88-94.
38. Pickens R.W., Dougherty J.A. Conditioning of the activity effects of drugs. Thompson T., Pickens R.W. Stimulus properties of drugs. 1971;39-50 Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
39. Pihl R.O., Altman J. An experimental analysis of the placebo effect. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 11:1971;91-95.
40. Post R.M., Weiss S.R.B., Pert A. Sensitization and kindling effects of chronic cocaine. Lakoski J.M., Galloway M.P., White F.J. Cocaine: pharmacology, physiology and clinical strategies. 1992;115-161 CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
41. Reimer A.R., Martin-Iverson M.T. Nimodipine and haloperidol attenuate behavioural sensitization to cocaine but only nimodipine blocks the establishment of conditioned locomotion induced by cocaine. Psychopharmacology. 113:1994;404-410.
42. Robinson T.E., Browman K.E., Crombag H.S., Badiani A. Modulation of the induction or expression of psychostimulant sensitization by the circumstances surrounding drug administration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22:1998;347-354.
43. Siegel S. Drug-anticipating responses in animals. White L., Tursky B., Schwartz G.E. Placebo: theory, practice and mechanisms. 1985;288-305 Guilford Press, New York.
44. Silverman P.B., Bonate P.L. Role of conditioned stimuli in addiction. Johnson B.A., Roache J.D. Drug addiction and its treatment: nexus of neuroscience and behavior. 1997;115-133 Lippincott-Raven, Philadephia, PE.
45. Steckler T., Holsboer F. Conditioned activity to amphetamine in transgenic mice expressing an antisense RNA against the glucocorticoid receptor. Behav. Neurosci. 115:2001;207-219.
46. Stewart J., Badiani A. Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav. Pharmacol. 4:1993;289-312.
47. Stewart J., Eikelboom R. Conditioned drug effects. Iversen L.L., Iversen S.D., Snyder S.H. Handbook of psychopharmacology. 1987;207-224 Plenum, New York.
48. Stewart J., Vezina P. Extinction procedures abolish conditioned stimulus control but spare sensitized responding to amphetamine. Behav. Pharmacol. 2:1991;65-71.
49. Szechtman H., Talangbayan H., Eilam D. Environmental and behavioral components of sensitization induced by the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav. Pharmacol. 4:1993;405-410.
50. Szumlinski K.K., McCafferty C.A., Maisonneuve I.M., Glick S.D. Interactions between 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC) and cocaine: dissociation of behavioural and neurochemical sensitization. Brain Res. 871:2000;245-258.
51. Tilson H.A., Rech R.H. Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance to d-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 1:1973;149-153.
52. Tirelli E., Terry P. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity and sensitization: the role of habituation to the test context and the involvement of Pavlovian processes. Behav. Pharmacol. 9:1998;409-419.
53. Tirelli E., Tambour S., Michel A. Sensitised locomotion does not predict conditioned locomotion in cocaine-treated mice: further evidence against the excitatory conditioning theory of contextual sensitisation. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;. [in press].
54. Willner P., Papp M., Cheeta S., Muscat R. Environmental influences on behavioural sensitization to the dopamine agonist quinpirole. Behav. Pharmacol. 3:1992;43-50.
55. Winer B.J., Brown D.K., Michels K.M. Statistical principles in experimental design. 3rd ed. 1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
56. Wood R.D., Tirelli E., Snyder K.J., La Rocca T.M., Spear L.P. Evidence for behavioral sensitization to cocaine in preweanling rat pups. Psychopharmacology. 138:1998;114-123.