Symbols, stimulus equivalence and the origins of language

Behavior and Philosophy

Volumn 29, Issue , 2001, Pages 221-244

  Dickins, Thomas E ^a   Dickins, David W ^b  

^a NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Learning; Stimulus equivalence; Symbols

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038752299     PISSN: 10538348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Ariew, A. (1996). Innateness and canalisation. Philosophy of Science, 63, 19-27.
2. Ariew, A. (1999). Innateness is canalisation: In defence of a developmental account of innateness. In: V. G. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 117-138). London: MIT Press.
3. Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., & Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Augustson, K. G., & Dougher, M. J. (1992). Teaching conditional discrimination to young children: Some methodological successes and failures. Experimental Analysis of Human Behaviour Bulletin, 9, 21-24.
5. Balkenius, C., Gärdenfors, P., & Hall, L. (2000). The origin of symbols in the brain. In J-L Desalles & L. Ghadakpour (Eds.). Proceedings of the 3rd International Evolution of Language Conference, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, 13-17.
6. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.). (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Barnes, D., McCullagh, P. D., & Keenan, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing-impaired children and hearing-impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behaviour, 8, 19-30.
8. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. London: MIT Press.
9. Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The evolution of a theory of mind. In M. C. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.), The descent of the mind (pp. 261-277). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Bentall, R. P., Dickins, D. W., & Fox, S. R. A. (1993). Naming and equivalence: Response latencies for emergent relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 46B, 187-214.
11. Bentall, R. P., Jones, R. M., & Dickins, D. W. (1999). Control over emergent relations during the formation of equivalence classes: Response error and latency data for 5-member classes. The Psychological Record, 49, 93-116.
12. Bloom, P., & Markson, L. (1998). Capacities underlying word learning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2(2), 67-73.
13. Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and loss: Volume 1. London: Penguin Books
14. Brinck, I. (2000). Attention and the evolution of intentional communication. In J-L Desalles & L. Ghadakpour (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Evolution of Language Conference, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, 23-26.
15. Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. London: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1985). Vervet monkey alarm calls: Manipulation through shared information? Behaviour, 94, 150-166.
17. Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1988) Assessment of meaning & the detection of unreliable signals by vervet monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 36, 477-486
18. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behaviour. Language, 26-58.
19. Clayton, M. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 49, 145-161.
20. Corballis, M. C. (1991). The lopsided ape: Evolution of the generative mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
22. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. London: Penguin: Allen Lane.
24. Desalles, J. L. (1998). Altruism, status and the origin of relevance. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 130-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 46, 243-257.
26. Dickins, D. W., Bentall, R. P., & Smith, A. B. (1993). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations: The effects of paired-associates training between names. The Psychological Record, 43, 713-724.
27. Dickins, D. W., Singh, K. D., Roberts, N., Burns, P., Downes, J. J., Jimmieson, P., & Bentall, R. P. (in press). An fMRI study of stimulus equivalence. NeuroReport, 12(2).
28. Dickins, T. E. (2000a). Signal to symbol: The first stage in the evolution of language. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Sheffield.
29. Dickins, T. E. (2000b). A non-modular suggestion about the origin of symbols. In J-L Desalles & L. Ghadakpour (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Evolution of Language Conference, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, 82-86.
30. Donald, M. (1998). Mimesis and executive suite: Missing links in language evolution. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight, (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 44-67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Dretske, F. (1993). Misrepresentation. In A. I. Goldman (Ed.), Readings in philosophy and cognitive science (pp. 297-314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice (pp. 115-138). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 16, 681-735.
34. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.
35. Elman, J. L. (1993). Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of starting small. Cognition, 48, 71-99.
36. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. London: MIT Press.
37. Fields, L., Adams, B. J., Verhave, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence sets. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 53, 345-358.
38. Fields, L., Landon-Jimenez, D. V., Buffington, & Adams, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 64, 129-146.
39. Fields, L., & Nevin, J. A. (1993). Stimulus equivalence: A special issue of The Psychological Record, 43(4), 541-844.
40. Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 48, 317-332.
41. Fields, L., Verhave, T., & Fath, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 42, 143-157.
42. Goldin-Meadow, S. (1993). When does gesture become language? A study of gesture used as a primary communication system by deaf children of hearing parents. In K. R. Gibson & T. Ingold, (Eds.), Tools, language and cognition in human evolution (pp. 63-85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 205, 581-598.
44. Grantham, T., & Nichols, S. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: Ultimate explanations and Panglossian predictions. In V. G. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays (pp. 47-66). London: MIT Press.
45. Greenfield, P. M. (1991). Language, tools and brain: the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organised sequential behaviour. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 14, 531-595.
46. Hardcastle, V. G. (Ed.). (1999). Where biology meets psychology: Philosophical essays. London: MIT Press.
47. Hauser, M. D. (1996). The Evolution of Communication. London: MIT Press.
48. Hayes, S. C. (1986). Developing a theory of derived stimulus relations. Commentary on Horne, P. J. & Lowe, C. F. On the origins of naming and other symbolic behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 65, 309-311.
49. Hayes, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, cognition, and the evolution of behaviour analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1383-1395.
50. Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Ruckstuhl, L. E. (1996). Relational frame theory and executive function: a behavioural approach. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 279-305). P. H. Brookes.
51. Hewes, G. W. (1976). The current status of the gestural theory of language origin. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280, 482-504.
52. Hewes, G. W. (1977). Language Origin Theories. In D. M. Rumbaugh (Ed.), Language learning by a chimpanzee: The Lana Project (pp. 3-53). New York: Academic Press.
53. Home, P. J., & Lowe, F. C. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behaviour. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 65(1), 185-241.
54. Hurford, J. R. (1989). Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device. Lingua, 77, 187- 222.
55. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. London: MIT Press.
56. Knight, C. (1998). Ritual/speech coevolution: A solution to the problem of deception. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight, (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 68-91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. B. (1993). An introduction to behavioural ecology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
58. Leavens, D. A., & Hopkins, W. D. (1998). Intentional communication by chimpanzees: A cross-sectional study of the use of referential gestures. Developmental Psychology, 34(5), 813-822.
59. Locke, J. L. (1998). Social sound-making as a precursor to spoken language. In J. R. Hurford, M. Studdert-Kennedy, & C. Knight, (Eds.), Approaches to the evolution of language (pp. 190-201). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
60. Mandell, C., & Sheen, V. (1994). Equivalence class formation as a function of the pronounceability of the sample stimulus. Behavioural Processes, 32, 29-46.
61. Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (1999). (Eds.). Concepts: Core readings. London: MIT Press.
62. Markson, L., & Bloom, P. (1997). Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature, 385(6619), 813-815.
63. Noble, W., & Davidson, I. (1996). Human evolution, language and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Oliphant, M. (1996). The dilemma of Saussurean communication. BioSystems, 37, 31-38.
65. Oliphant, M. (1997). Formal approaches to innate and learned communication: Laying the foundation for language (Doctoral thesis, 1997). [On-line]. Available: http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~oliphant
66. Oliphant, M. (1998). Rethinking the language bottleneck: Why don't animals learn to communicate? Paper presented to the 2nd International Conference on the Evolution of Language [On-line] Unpublished MS form available: http://www.ling.ed.ac.uk/~oliphant
67. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London: Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
68. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. London: Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
69. Pinker, S., & P. Bloom (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13, 707-784.
70. Place, U. T. (1995/6). Symbolic processes and stimulus equivalence. Behavior and Philosophy, 23/4, 13-30.
71. Place, U. T. (2000a). The role of the hand in the evolution of language. Psycoloquy [On-line]. Available: http://www. cogsci. soton. ac. uk/psyc
72. Place, U. T. (2000b). From icon to symbol: An important transition in the evolution of language. Proceedings of the 3rd International Evolution of Language Conference, Ecole Nationale Superieure des Telecommunications, 183-184.
73. Randell, T., & Remington, R. (1999). Equivalence relations between visual stimuli: the functional role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 71, 395-415.
74. Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21(5), 188-194.
75. Samuels, R. (1998). Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 49, 575-602.
76. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Murphy, J., Sevick, R. A., Brakke, K. E., Williams, S. L., & Rumbaugh, D. M. (1993). Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs for the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 1-256.
77. Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
78. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behaviour: A research story. Boston: Authors' Cooperative Inc.
79. Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 74(1), 127-146.
80. Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 43, 21-42.
81. Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 37, 5-52.
82. Skinner, B. F. (1957) Verbal behaviour. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
83. Smith, A. B., Dickins, D. W., & Bentall, R. P. (1996). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations II: The effects of interfering tasks prior to and after tests for emergent relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 109-130.
84. Spencer, T. J., & Chase, P. N. (1996). Speed analyses of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 65, 643-659.
85. Suddendorf, T. (1999). The rise of the metamind. In M. C. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.). The descent of the mind (pp. 218-260). Oxford:Oxford University Press.