A model describing chemical interference caused by decomposing residues at different densities of growing plants

Plant and Soil

Volumn 250, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 315-322

  Sinkkonen, Aki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chemical interference; Decomposition; Plant density; Plant residue; Residue allelopathy model

Indexed keywords

ALLELOPATHY; DECOMPOSITION; DENSITY DEPENDENCE; INHIBITION; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT RESIDUE;

EID: 0038581828     PISSN: 0032079X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022841503476     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. An M, Johnson I R and Lovett J V 1993 Mathematical modeling of allelopathy: biological response to allelochemicals and its interpretation. J. Chem. Ecol. 19, 2379-2388.
2. An M, Johnson I R and Lovett J V 1996 Mathematical modelling of allelopathy. I. Phytotoxicity caused by plant residues during decomposition. Allelopathy J. 3, 33-42.
3. An M, Pratley J E and Haig T 2001a Phytotoxicity of vulpia residues: III. Biological activity of identified allelochemicals from Vulpia myuros. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 383-394.
4. An M, Pratley J E and Haig T 2001b Phytotoxicity of vulpia residues: IV. Dynamics of allelochemicals during decomposition of vulpia residues and their corresponding phytotoxicity. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 395-410.
5. Birkett M A, Chamberlain K, Hooper A M and Pickett J A 2001 Does allelopathy offer real promise for practical weed management and for explaining rhizosphere interactions involving higher plants? Plant Soil 232, 31-39.
6. Blum U, Shafer S R and Lehman M E 1999 Evidence for inhibitory allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids in field soils: concepts vs. an experimental model. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 673-693.
7. Brierley E D R, Wood M and Shaw P J A 2001 Influence of tree species and ground vegetation on nitrification in an acid forest soil. Plant Soil 229, 97-104.
8. Burdziak A, Schulz M and Klemme J H 2001 Isolation and characterization of bacteria being able to degrade benzoxazolinone (BOA). In First European Allelopathy Symposium: Physiological Aspects of Allelopathy. Eds. M J Reigosa and N Pedrol. pp. 245. University of Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
9. Carballeira A, Carral E and Reigosa M J 1988 Asymmetric Small-Scale Distribution and Allelopathy: Interaction between Rumex obtusifolius L. and meadow species. J. Chem. Ecol. 14, 1775-1786.
10. Cochran V L, Elliott L F and Papendic R I 1977 The production of phytotoxins from surface crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 903-908.
11. Darrah P R 1991 a Models of the rhizosphere I. Microbial population dynamics around a root releasing soluble and insoluble carbon. Plant Soil 133, 187-199.
12. Darrah P R 1991b Models of the rhizosphereII. A quasi three-dimensional simulation of the microbial population dynamics around a growing root releasing soluble exudates. Plant Soil 138, 147-158.
13. Donald W W 1998 Estimated soybean (Glycine max) yield loss from herbicide damage using ground cover or rated stunting. Weed Sci. 46, 454-458.
14. Guenzi W D and McCalla T M 1966 Phenolic acids in oats, wheat, sorghum and corn residues and their phytotoxicity. Agron. J. 85, 303-304.
15. Harper S H T and Lynch J M 1982 The role of water-soluble components in phytotoxicity from decomposing straw. Plant Soil 65, 11-17.
16. Inderjit and Dakshini K M M 1995 On laboratory bioassays in allelopathy. Bot. Rev. 61, 28-44.
17. Inderjit and Weston L A 2000 Are laboratory bioassays for allelopathy suitable for prediction of field responses? J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 2111-2118.
18. Marschner P. Yang C-H, Lieberei R and Crowley D E 2001 Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1437-1445.
19. Morrison I N, Nawolsky K M, Entz M H and Smith A E 1991 Differences among certified wheat seedlots in response to trifluralin. Agron. J. 83, 119-123.
20. Mukhopadhyay A, Chattopadhyay J and Tapaswi P K 1998 A delay differential equations model of plankton allelopathy. Mathem. Biosci. 149, 167-189.
21. Nakamaru M and Iwasa Y 2000 Competition by allelopathy proceeds in traveling waves: colicin-immune strain aids colicin-sensitive strain. Theor. Popul. Biol. 57, 131-144.
22. Nilsson M-C 1994 Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the boreal dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup. Oecologia 98, 1-7.
23. Pellissier F and Souto X C 1999 Allelopathy in northern temperate and boreal semi-natural woodland. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 637-652.
24. Rizvi S J H, Tahir M, Rizvi V, Kohli R K and Ansari A 1999 Allelopathic interactions in agroforestry systems. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18, 773-796.
25. Schulz M and Wieland I 1999 Variation in metabolism of BOA among species in various field communities - biochemical evidence for co-evolutionary processes in plant communities? Chemoecology 9, 133-141.
26. Schutter M and Dick R 2001 Shifts in substrate utilization potential and structure of soil microbial communities in response to carbon substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 1481-1491.
27. Sinkkonen A 2001 Density-dependent chemical interference - an extension of the biological response model. J. Chem. Ecol. 27, 1513-1523.
28. Stowe L G 1979 Allelopathy and its influence on the distribution of plants in an Illinois old-field. J. Ecol. 67, 1065-1085.
29. Tharp BE and Kells J J 2000 Effect of soil-applied herbicides on establishment of cover crop species. Weed Technol. 14, 496-601.
30. Thijs H, Shann J R and Weidenhamer J D 1994 The effect of phytotoxins on competitive outcome in a model system. Ecology 75, 1959-1964.
31. Tybirk K, Nilsson M-C, Michelsen A, Kristensen H L, Shevtsova A, Strandberg M T, Johansson M, Knud E N, Riis-Nielsen T, Strandberg B and Johnsen I 2000 Nordic Empetrum dominated ecosystems: Function and susceptibility to environmental changes. Ambio 29, 90-97.
32. Vance E D and Chapin III F S 2001 Substrate limitations to microbial acitivity in taiga forest floors. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 173-188.
33. Wardle D A, Nilsson M-C, Gallet C and Zackrisson O 1998 An ecosystem-level perspective of allelopathy. Biol. Rev. 73, 305-319.
34. Weidenhamer J D 1996 Distinguishing resource competition and chemical interference: overcoming the methodological impasse. Agron. J. 88, 866-875.
35. Weidenhamer J D, Hartnett D C and Romeo J T 1989 Density-dependent phytotoxicity: distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants. J. Appl. Ecol. 26, 613-624.
36. Weston L A 1996 Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88, 860-866.
37. Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H and Hozumi H 1963 Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J. Biol. Osaka City Univ. Ser. D 14, 107-129.