Are laboratory bioassays for allelopathy suitable for prediction of field responses?

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 2111-2118

  Inderjit, ^a   Weston, Leslie A ^b  

^a PANJAB UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Plant Science Building ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Allelochemicals; Allelopathy; Field settings; Laboratory bioassays; Soil

Indexed keywords

ALLELOPATHY; BIOASSAY;

BIOASSAY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROP; ECOLOGY; LABORATORY; PREDICTION; SOIL; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

EID: 0033755342     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005516431969     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. The value of model plant-microbe-soil systems for understanding processes associated with allelopathic interaction: One example
2. Allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids
3. Benefits of citrate over EDTA for extracting phenolic acids from soils and plant debris
4. Designing laboratory plant debris-soil bioassays: Some reflections
5. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: Reply
6. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: Reply
7. Characterization of the mechanisms of allelopathy: Modeling and experimental approaches
8. Allelopathy: One component in a multifaceted approach to ecology
9. The occurrence and behavior of plant phenolic acids in soil environments and their potential involvement in allelochemicals interference interactions: Methodological limitations in establishing conclusive proof of allelopathy
10. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: Comment
11. Allelopathy: Current status and future goals
12. Potential for exploiting allelopathy to enhance crop production
13. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
14. How to make bioassays for allelopathy more relevant to field conditions with particular reference to cropland weeds
15. Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology: Synthesis of comments
16. Soil: Effect of environment on allelochemical activity
17. On laboratory bioassays in allelopathy
18. Bioassays for allelopathy; interactions of soil organic and inorganic constituents
19. Is separating resource competition from allelopathy realistic?
20. Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) are allelopathic to weeds
21. Microcosms and soil ecology: Critical linkages between field studies and modelling food webs
22. The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition
23. Allelopathy as a factor in ecological process
24. Adverse impacts of allelopathy in agricultural systems
25. Bioassays for allelopathy in terrestrial plants
26. Ecological implication of destruction of juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-napthoquinone) by soil bacteria
27. Microbial competition and soil structure limit the expression of allelochemicals in nature
28. Joint action of natural and synthetic photosystem II inhibitors
29. The effect of phytotoxins on competitive outcome in a model system
30. Solution volume and seed number: Often overlooked factors in allelopathic bioassays
31. Density-dependent phytotoxicity: Distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants
32. Inhibition of growth, nodulation, and nitrogen fixation of legumes by quackgrass
33. Allelopathic potential of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid (Sudex)