Impact factor bias and proposed adjustments for its determination

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 902-905

  Fassoulaki, A ^a   Papilas, K ^a   Paraskeva, A ^a   Patris, K ^a  

^a NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Correction factors; Impact factor; Medical journals; Scientific field

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DERMATOLOGY; EVALUATION; GENETICS; HEREDITY; HUMAN; IMMUNOLOGY; INTERNAL MEDICINE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SURGERY;

BIBLIOMETRICS; PERIODICALS;

EID: 0036078909     PISSN: 00015172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460723.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Impact factors need to be improved
2. Academic anesthesiologists' views on the importance of the impact factor of scientific journals. A North American and European survey
3. Impact factors in anaesthesia journals
4. What is happening to the quality of research-And how can quality be measured?
5. Citation analysis and journal impact factors-Is the tail wagging the dog?
6. Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor
7. Journal accused of manipulating impact factor
8. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
9. Science citation index