Practice development: Purpose, methodology, facilitation and evaluation

Nursing in Critical Care

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 22-29

  Manley, Kim ^a   McCormack, Brendan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Action research; Culture; Evaluation; Facilitation; Methodology; Practice development

Indexed keywords

EMERGENCY NURSING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CRITICAL CARE; EMERGENCY NURSING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 0038320528     PISSN: 13621017     EISSN: 14785153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470698884.ch3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Berwick DM. (1989). Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. The New England Journal of Medicine; 320: 53–56.
2. Carr W, Kemmis S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: The Falmer Press.
3. Clarke C, Proctor S. (1999). Practice development: ambiguity in research and practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 30: 975–982.
4. Dunn V, Crichton N, Roe N, Williams K. (1998). Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS scale. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 27: 1203–1210.
5. Elliott J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
6. Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Champagne MT. (1989). A model for improving the dissemination of nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research; 11: 361–367.
7. Garbett R, McCormack B. (2000). Concept Analysis: Practice Devel-opment. London: RCN Institute London.
8. Garbett R, McCormack B. (2002). A concept analysis of practice development. NT Research; 7: 87–99.
9. Greenwood J. (1994). Action research: a few details, a caution and something new. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 20: 13–18.
10. Grundy S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum Perspectives; 2: 23–34.
11. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Habermas J. (1972). In: Shapiro JJ, Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann.
13. Haines A, Jones R. (1994). Implementing findings of research. BMJ; 308: 1488–1492.
14. Jenny J, Logan J. (1992). Knowing the patient: One aspect of clinical knowledge. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship; 24: 254–258.
15. Kanter RM. (1983). The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work. London: Unwin.
16. Kemmis S, McTaggart R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
17. Kitson AL, Ahmed LD, Harvey G, Seers K, Thompson DR. (1996). From research to practice; One organisational model for pro-moting research based practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 23: 430–440.
18. Kitson AL, Harvey G, McCormack B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: a conceptual frame-work. Quality in Health Care; 7: 149–158.
19. Knight S. (1994). An organisational approach. Nursing Standard; 90: 33–35.
20. Laughlin R, Broadbent J. (1997). Redesigning fourth generation Evaluation. Evaluation; 2: 431–451.
21. Lewin K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. II. Channels of group life: social planning and action research. Human Relations; 1: 143–153.
22. Mallett J, Cathmoir D, Hughes P, Whitby E. (1997). Forging new roles … professional and practice development. Nursing Times; 93: 38–39.
23. Manley K. (1997a). Practice development: a growing and signifi-cant movement. Nursing in Critical Care; 2: 5.
24. Manley K. (1997b). Knowledge for nursing practice. (chapter 10). In: Perry A, (ed.), The Knowledge Base for Nursing (2nd ed). London: Arnold.
25. Manley K. (2000a). Organisational culture and consultant nurse outcomes. Part 1. Organisational culture. Nursing Standard; 14: 34–38.
26. Manley K. (2000b). Organisational culture and consultant nurse outcomes. Part 2. Consultant nurse outcomes. Nursing Stand-ard; 14: 34–39.
27. Manley K. (2001). Consultant nurse: concept, processes, outcome. Unpublished PhD. Manchester University/RCN Institute London.
28. Manley K, Garbett R. (2000). Paying Peter and Paul: reconciling concepts of expertise with competency for a clinical career structure. Journal of Clinical Nursing; 9: 347–359.
29. McCormack B, Manley K, Kitson A, Titchen A, Harvey G. (1999). Towards practice development – a vision in reality or a reality without vision? Journal of Nursing Management; 7: 255–264.
30. McCutcheon G, Jung B. (1990). Alternative Perspectives on Action Research. Theory Into Practice; XXIX: 144–151.
31. McGuire J. (1990). Putting nursing research findings into practice: research utilisation as an aspect of the management of change. Journal of Advanced Nursing; 15: 614–620.
32. McNiff J. (1988). Action Research: Principles and Practice. Basing-stoke: McMillan Education.
33. Schein EH. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, California: Jossey Bass.
34. Susman GI, Evered RD. (1978). An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research Administrative Science Quarterly; 23: 582–602.
35. Tanner CA, Benner P, Chesla C, Gordon DR. (1993). The phenomenology of knowing the patient. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship; 25: 273–280.
36. Titchen A. (2000). Professional Craft Knowledge in Patient-Centred Nursing and the Facilitation of its Development. DPhil Linacre College Oxford /Ashdale Press Tackley Oxfordshire.
37. Unsworth J. (2000). Practice development: a concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Management; 6: 317–322.
38. Walshe M. (1997). Perceptions of barriers to implementing research. Nursing Standard; 11: 34–37.
39. Whitehead J, Foster D. (1984). Action Research and Professional Devel-opment. Cambridge Action Research Network Bulletin No. 6.
40. Whyte WF. (ed.) (1991). Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Wuthnow R, Davison Hunter J, Bergesen A, Kurzweil E. (1984). Cultural Analysis. London: Routledge.