Quantum mechanical models correlating structure with selectivity: Predicting the enantioselectivity of β-amino alcohol catalysts in aldehyde alkylation

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 22, 2003, Pages 6614-6615

  Kozlowski, Marisa C ^a   Dixon, Steven L ^b   Panda, Manoranjan ^a   Lauri, Giorgio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b PHARMACOPEIA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDE; AMINOALCOHOL;

ALKYLATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CATALYST; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PREDICTION; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALDEHYDES; ALKYLATION; AMINO ALCOHOLS; CATALYSIS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; QUANTUM THEORY; STEREOISOMERISM; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0038318801     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0293195     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: New York; 1999.
2. (a) For reviews see: Transition State Modeling for Catalysis; Truhlar, D. G., Morokuma, K., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 721: American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1999; Chapters 1, 3, 13, 14.
3. (b) Kozlowski, M. C.; Panda, M. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 399.
4. (c) Kozlowski, M. C.; Panda, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2061.
5. Use of PM3 to design a catalyst for the reaction in Figure 1: Vidal-Ferran, A.; Moyano, A.; Pericás, M. A.; Riera, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8773.
6. (a) Goodford, P. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849.
7. (b) Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959.
8. 3D-QSAR in Drug Design: Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G., Martin, Y. C., Eds.; Kluwer: Leiden, 1993-1996; Vols. 1-3. Particularly, Vol. 3: Martin, Y. C. Recent Progress in CoMFA Methodology and Related Techniques.
9. Oslob, J. D.; Åkermark, B.; Helquist, P.; Norrby, P.-O. Organometallics 1997, 16, 3015.
10. For chiral recognition in chromatography and catalysis: Lipkowitz, K. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 555. (b) Lipkowitz, K. B.; D'Hue, C. A.; Sakamoto, T.; Stack, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14255.
11. For chiral recognition in chromatography and catalysis: Lipkowitz, K. B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 555. (b) Lipkowitz, K. B.; D'Hue, C. A.; Sakamoto, T.; Stack, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14255.
12. Kitamura, M.; Suga, S.; Kawai, K.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 6071.
13. Pu, L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 757 and references therein.
14. (a) Yamakawa, M.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6327.
15. (b) Yamakawa, M.; Noyori, R. Organometallics 1999, 18, 128.
16. (c) Goldfuss, B.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8998.
17. (d) Goldfuss, B.; Steigelmann, M.; Khan, S. I.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 77.
18. (e) Vazquez, J.; Pericas, M. A.; Maseras, F.; Lledos, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7303.
19. (f) Panda, M.; Phuan, P.-W.; Kozlowski, M. C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 564.
20. Four transition structures (anti S, anti R, syn S, and syn R) are possible for each catalyst. PM3 transition-structure energies correctly predict the sign of the enantioselection in most cases, but quantitative predictions fail in some instances (ref 10f).
21. For a complete description of this methodology, see: Dixon, S. L.; Lauri, G.; Merz, K. M., Jr. Manuscript in preparation.
22. Dixon, S. L.; Merz, K. M., Jr. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 879.