Weed suppression by Medicago sativa in subsequent cereal crops: A comparative survey

Weed Science

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 282-290

  Ominski, P D ^a   Entz, M H ^a   Kenkel, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Alternative weed control; AMARE; AVEFA; CHEAL; CIRAR; GALAP; MEDSA; POLCO; Relative abundance; SETVI; SINAR; TAROF; THLAR; Weed patchiness; Weed suppression; Weed crop ecology

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CEREAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; WEED CONTROL;

CANADA; MANITOBA;

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; AVENA FATUA; BRASSICA; BRASSICA KABER; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; CIRSIUM ARVENSE; CONVOLVULUS; GALIUM; GALIUM APARINE; MEDICAGO SATIVA; POLYGONUM; POLYGONUM CONVOLVULUS; SETARIA VIRIDIS; SINAPIS ARVENSIS; SPERMATOPHYTA; TARAXACUM OFFICINALE; THLASPI; THLASPI ARVENSE;

EID: 0032824248     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/s0043174500091785     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anonymous. 1997. Cleavers Costs You Money. Cleavers Factsheet. Carman, MB: Manitoba Agriculture, Saskatchewan Agriculture and Food, and Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development. 10 p.
2. 2 uptake. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24:258-286.
3. Burnside, O. C. 1993. Weed science - the step child. Weed Technol. 7: 515-518.
4. Champness, S. S. 1949. Notes on the buried seed populations beneath different types of ley in their seeding year. J. Ecol. 37:51-56.
5. Chepil, W. S. 1946. Germination of weed seeds: I. Longevity, periodicity of germination, and vitality of seeds in cultivated soil. Sci. Agric. 26: 307-346.
6. Derksen, D. A., G. P. Lafond, A. G. Thomas, H. A. Loeppky, and C. J. Swanton. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci. 41:409-417.
7. Derscheid, L. A., L. N. Russel, and G. A. Wicks. 1961. Thistle control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals. Weeds 9:90-102.
8. Donald, W. W. 1990. Management and control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Rev. Weed Sci. 5:193-250.
9. Douglas, B. J., A. G. Thomas, I. N. Morrison, and M. G. Maw. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 70. Setaria viridis (L) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:669-690.
10. Entz, M. H., W. J. Bullied, and F. Katepa-Mupondwa. 1995. Rotational benefits of forage crops in Canadian prairie cropping systems. J. Prod. Agric. 8:521-529.
11. Frick, B. and A. G. Thomas. 1992. Weed surveys in different tillage systems in southwestern Ontario field crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72:1337-1347.
12. Green, R. H. 1993. Relating two sets of variables in environmental studies. Pages 149-163 in G. Patil and C. Rao, eds. Multivariate Environmental Statistics. The Hague: Elsevier Science Publishers.
13. Haas, H. and J. C. Streibig. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. Pages 57-79 in H. M. LeBaron and I. Gressel, eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. Hodgson, J. M. 1958. Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense Scop.) control with cultivation, cropping, and chemical sprays. Weeds 6:1-12.
15. Hunter, H. H., I. N. Morrison, and D. R. Rourke. 1990. The Canadian prairie provinces. Pages 51-89 in W. W. Donald, ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Monograph 6. Champaign, IL: Weed Sci. Soc. Am.
16. Jongman, R. H., C. J. Ter Braak, and O. F. Van Tongeren. 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 299 p.
17. Legere, A. 1993. Perennial weeds in conservation tillage systems: more of an issue than in conventional tillage systems? Pages 747-752 in Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Weeds. Volume 2. Brighton, U.K.: Brighton Crop Protection Council.
18. Lotz, L.A.P., J. Wallinga, and M. J. Kropff. 1995. Crop-weed interactions: quantification and prediction. Pages 31-47 in D. M. Glen, M. P. Greaves, and H. M. Anderson, eds. Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems. Bristol, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
19. Manly, B.F.J. 1994. Multivariate Statistical Methods, A Primer. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall. 159 p.
20. Mead, R., R. N. Curnow, and A. M. Hasted. 1993. Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall. 415 p.
21. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium Arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033-1048.
22. Morrison, D. F. 1990. Multivariate Statistical Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill. 495 p.
23. Pavlychenko, T. K. 1942. Root Systems of Certain Forage Crops in Relation to Their Management of Agricultural Soils. National Research Council of Canada and Dominion Department of Agriculture N.R.C. 1088. 88 p.
24. Pearcy, R. W., N. Tumosa, and K. Williams. 1981. Relationships between growth and competitive interactions for a C3 and a C4 plant. Oecologia 48:371-376.
25. Peters, E. J. and D. L. Linscott. 1988. Weeds and weed control. Pages 705-735 in A. A. Hanson, D. K. Barnes, and R. R. Hill, eds. Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America.
26. Podani, J. 1993. SYN-TAX-pc Computer Programs for Multivariate Data Analysis in Ecology and Systematics. Version 5.0. Budapest, Hungary: Scientia Publishing.
27. Radosevich, S., J. Holt, and C. Gersha. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 589 p.
28. Roberts, H. A. and P. M. Feast. 1973. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and undisturbed soil. J. Appl. Ecol. 10: 133-143.
29. Roush, M. L., S. R. Radosevich, and B. D. Maxwell. 1990. Future outlook for herbicide-resistance research. Weed Technol. 4:208-214.
30. Schoner, C. A., R. F. Norris, and W. Chilcote. 1978. Yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens) biotype studies: growth and morphological characteristics. Weed Sci. 6:632-636.
31. Schoofs, A. 1997. The Role of Annual Forages in Integrated Weed Management. M.Sc. thesis. University of Manitoba. Winnipeg, MB. 142 p.
32. Siemens, L. B. 1963. Cropping Systems: An Evaluative Review of Literature. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Manitoba Technical Bull. 1. 89 p.
33. Stahler, L. M. 1948. Shade and soil moisture as factors in competition between selected crops and field bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 40:490-502.
34. Stupnicka-Rodzynkiewicz, E. 1996. Changes in population sizes of weeds in cereals grown in a five-year rotation. Pages 185-190 in Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Weed Control Congress.
35. Swanton, C. J. and S. F. Weise. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657-663.
36. Thomas, A. G. 1985. Weed survey system used in Saskatchewan for cereal and oilseed crops. Weed. Sci. 33:34-43.
37. Thomas, A. G. and D. I. Donaghy. 1991. A survey of the occurrence of seedling weeds in spring annual crops in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:811-820.
38. Thomas, A. G., B. Frick, D. A. Derksen, S. A. Brandt, and R. P. Zentner. 1996. Crop rotations and weed community dynamics on the Canadian prairies. Pages 227-232 in Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Weed Control Congress.
39. Thomas, A. G., D. Kelner, R. F. Wise, and B. L. Frick. 1997. Manitoba Weed Survey (Publication 97-1), Comparing Zero and Conventional Tillage Crop Production Systems 1994. Carman, Manitoba: Manitoba Agriculture, Soils and Crops Branch.
40. Thurston, J. M. 1966. Survival of seeds of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and Avenu ludoviciana Dur.) and charlock (Sinapis arvensis L.) in soil under leys. Weed Res. 6:67-80.
41. Todd, B. G. and D. A. Derkson. 1986. Perennial weed control in wheat in Western Canada. Pages 391-404 in A. E. Slinkard and D. B. Fowler, eds. Wheat Production in Canada - A Review. Proc. Canadian Wheat Symp. March 3-5, 1986. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
42. Wyse, D. L. 1994. New technologies and approaches for weed management in sustainable agriculture systems. Weed Technol. 8:403-407.