IOL calculation and ultrasound biometry: Immersion vs. contact technique;Iol-berechnung und ultraschallbiometrie: Immersions- und kontaktverfahren

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde

Volumn 213, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 161-165

  Hoffmann, Peter C ^a,b   Hütz, Werner W ^a   Berthold Eckharde, H ^a   Heuring, Alexander H ^a  

^a Augenklinik   (Germany)

^b Praxis/Praxisklinik Dr Hoffmann/P ^*

Author keywords

Biometry ultrasound; Calculation of intraocular lenses; Cataract; Cataract surgery; Computer; Intraocular lenses

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CALCULATION; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOOCULOGRAPHY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENS IMPLANT; LENS POWER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; WATER IMMERSION;

EID: 0031682664     PISSN: 00232165     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1034967     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Ramer G, Vass C, Hilzenberger CK, et al. Teilkohärenz-Laserinterferometne: eine neue hochpräzise Biometrie-Methode zur Verbesserung der Refraktion nach Kataraktchirurgie. Khn Monatshl Augenheilkd 1998; 212 (Suppl. 2) : 29
2. Haigis W. Biometrie. In: Straub W, Kroll P, Küchle HJ, Hrsg. Augenärztliche Untersuchungsmethoden. Stuttgart: Enke, 1995:255-304
3. Haigis W. IOL-Berechnung nach Haigis. Internet 1996; http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/uslab/iol/haid.html
4. Happe W, Wiechens B, Haigis W, Behrendt S, Duncker G. Intra-operative Skiaskopie zur Bestimmung des Brechwerts einer zu implantierenden Intraokularlinse. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 210 : 207-212
5. Hoffer KJ. Biometry of 7500 cataractous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 90 : 360-368
6. Hoffmann PC, Hütz WW, Eckhardt HB. Bedeutung der Formelauswahl für die postoperative Refraktion nach Katarakt-Operation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997; 211 : 168-177
7. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14 : 17-24
8. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Ruiz RS, Lewis JW, Rosenthal H. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculations. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104 : 539-541
9. Jensen PK, Rank R, Olsen T. Video controlled M-mode biometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995; 73 : 61-65
10. Nitsch J, Reiner J. Herleitung und kritische Analyse der Formeln zur Berechnung der Brechkraft intraokularer Linsen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1985; 186 : 66-73
11. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18 : 125-129
12. Olsen T, Nielsen PJ. Immersion versus contact technique in the measurement of axial length by ultrasound. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1989; 67 : 101-102
13. Olsen T, Thim K, Corydon L. Theoretical versus SRK I and SRK II calculation of intraocular lens power. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16 : 217-225
14. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16 : 333-340
15. Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraff MC, Gimbel HV, Raanan MC. Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16 : 341-346
16. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15 :425-428
17. Seiler T, Wollensak J. Die Äquivalenz verschiedener Berechnungsmodi von Linsenbrechkräften. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1985; 187 : 69-72
18. Shammas HJ. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 1984; 10 : 444-447