Influence of neighborhood size and exposure duration on visual-word recognition: Evidence with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision tasks

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 273-286

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Rosa, Eva ^a   Gómez, Consolación ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; TIME; VISION;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0037984097     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194799     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ALAMEDA, J. R., & CUETOS, F. (1995). Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüisticas del castellano [Dictionary of word frequency in Spanish]. Oviedo: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
2. ALLEN, P. A., McNEAL, M., & KVAK, D. (1992). Perhaps the lexicon is coded as a function of word frequency. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 826-844.
3. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
4. ANDREWS, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 234-254.
5. ANDREWS, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 775-800.
6. ANDREWS, S. (1997). The effects of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439-461.
7. ANDREWS, S., CONTENT, A., & PEEREMAN, R. (2000, November). Cross-language differences in the effects of orthographic neighbors. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
8. ANDREWS, S., & HEATHCOTE, A. (2001). Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word recognition: A matter of some moment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 514-544.
9. BALOTA, D. A., & SPIELER, D. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 32-55.
10. CARREIRAS, M., PEREA, M., & GRAINGER, J. (1997a, November). Blocking by frequency and neighborhood density. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Philadelphia.
11. CARREIRAS, M., PEREA, M., & GRAINGER, J. (1997b). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 857-871.
12. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. F., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. COLTHEART, M., RASTLE, K., PERRY, C., LANGDON, R., & ZIEGLER, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
14. DAVIS, C., CASTLES, A., & IAKOVIDIS, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in children and adults. Language & Cognitive Processes, 13, 625-651.
15. FORSTER, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. W. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. FORSTER, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1109-1115.
17. FORSTER, K. I., & SHEN, D. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory effects in lexical decision and categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 3, 696-713.
18. FORSTER, K. I., & VERES, C. (1998). The prime lexicality effect: Formpriming as a function of prime awareness, lexical status, and discrimination difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 498-514.
19. GIBBS, P., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1998). Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1162-1187.
20. GÓMEZ, P., PEREA, M., & RATCLIFF, R. (2002, July). A model of the "go/no-go" lexical decision task. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Society for Mathematical Psychology, Oxford, OH.
21. GORDON, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 24-44.
22. GORDON, B., & CARAMAZZA, A. (1982). Lexical decision for open- and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity. Brain & Language, 15, 143-160.
23. GRAINGER, J. (1992). Orthographic neighborhoods and visual word recognition. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 131-146). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
24. GRAINGER, J., CARREIRAS, M., & PEREA, M. (2000). A new technique for visual word recognition research: The luminance increment paradigm. Current Psychology Letters, 1, 107-116.
25. GRAINGER, J., & JACOBS, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
26. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SEGUI, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189-195.
27. GRAINGER, J., O'REGAN, J. K., JACOBS, A. M., & SEGUI, J. (1992). Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 49-56.
28. GRAINGER, J., & SEGUI, J. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 191-198.
29. GRICE, G. R., & REED, J. M. (1992). What makes targets redundant? Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 437-442.
30. HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1998). The effects of word frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1431-1453.
31. HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (2000). The effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 166-183.
32. HUNTSMAN, L. A., & LIMA, S. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 417-429.
33. JACOBS, A. M., & GRAINGER, J. (1992). Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1174-1188.
34. JACOBS, A. M., REY, A., ZIEGLER, J. C., & GRAINGER, J. (1998). MROMP-p: An interactive activation multiple readout model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. JARED, D., McRAE, K., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 687-715.
36. LANE, D. M., & ASHBY, B. (1987). PsychLib: A library of machine language routines for controlling psychology experiments on the Apple Macintosh computer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 246-248.
37. MATHEY, S., & ZAGAR, D. (2000). The neighborhood distribution effect in visual word recognition: Words with single and twin neighbors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 184-205.
38. McCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
39. PAAP, K. R., & JOHANSEN, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1129-1157.
40. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., McDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
41. PEEREMAN, R., & CONTENT, A. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sublexical correspondences? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 409-421.
42. PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (1996). Efectos de frecuencia silábica y vecindad ortográfica en la pronunciación de palabras y pseudopalabras [Effects of syllable frequency and orthographic neighborhood in the naming of words and pseudowords]. Psicológica, 17, 425-440.
43. PEREA, M., & CARREIRAS, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and neighborhood syllable frequency in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1-11.
44. PEREA, M., FERNÁNDEZ, L., & CARREIRAS, M. (1998, December). Efectos secuenciales en la (area de decisión léxica [Sequential effects in the lexical decision task]. Paper presented at the II Conference of the Spanish Experimental Psychology Society, Granada.
45. PEREA, M., & POLLATSEK, A. (1998). The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 767-779.
46. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2000). Repetition and form priming interact with neighborhood density at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 668-677.
47. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (2002). Does "whole-word shape" play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 785-794.
48. PEREA, M., & ROSA, E. (in press). Los efectos de facilitación semántica con las tareas de decisión léxica sí-no y sólo-sí [The effects of semantic priming with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision task]. Psicothema.
49. PEREA, M., ROSA, E., & GÓMEZ, C. (2002a). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50. PEREA, M., ROSA, E., & GÓMEZ, C. (2002b). Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task? Memory & Cognition, 30, 34-45.
51. PERESSOTTI, F., & GRAINGER, J. (1995). Letter-position coding in random consonant arrays. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 875-890.
52. PLAUT, D. C., McCLELLAND, J. L., SEIDENBERG, M. S., & PATTERSON, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
53. POLLATSEK, A., PEREA, M., & BINDER, K. (1999). The effects of neighborhood size in reading and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1142-1158.
54. POLLATSEK, A., & WELL, A. (1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 785-794.
55. RATCLIFF, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446-461.
56. RATCLIFF, R., GÓMEZ, P., & McKOON, G. (2002). A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Manuscript submitted for publication.
57. RUMELHART, D. E., & McCLELLAND, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
58. SEARS, C. R., HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood frequency and neighborhood size effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 876-900.
59. SEARS, C. R., HINO, Y., & LUPKER, S. J. (1999). Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 220-229.
60. SEARS, C. R., LUPKER, S. J., & HINO, Y. (1999). Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: A test of the multiple read-out model. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1537-1554.
61. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & McCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
62. TREIMAN, R., MULLENNIX, J., BIJELJAC-BABIC, R., & RICHMOND-WELTY, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
63. WESTALL, R., PERKEY, M. N., & CHUTE, D. L. (1986). Accurate millisecond timing on Apple's Macintosh using Drexel MilliTimer. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 18, 307-311.
64. YELLAND, G. (1993, November). Is there a place for phonological processes in reading development? Paper presented at the 9th Australian Language and Speech Conference, Sydney.
65. ZAGAR, D., & MATHEY, S. (2000). When WORDS with higher frequency neighbours become words with no higher frequency neighbors (or how to undress the neighbourhood frequency effect). In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.), Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 23-46). Oxford: Elsevier.
66. ZIEGLER, J. C., & PERRY, C. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighborhood: Resolving neighborhood conflicts in the lexical decision task. Cognition, 68, 53-62.