Microtensile bond strength tests: Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of sample integrity before testing

European journal of oral sciences

Volumn 110, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 385-391

  Ferrari, Marco ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Sadek, Fernanda ^b   Cardoso, Paulo Eduardo Capel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL SE BOND; EXCITE CEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADHESIVENESS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESIN CEMENTS; SMEAR LAYER; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 0037978969     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21317.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 1 Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991 ; 70: 889–893.
2. 2 Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989 ; 17: 61–67.
3. 3 Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength‐evaluation of a microtensile test. Dent Mater 1994 ; 10: 236–240.
4. 4 Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents. A review. Dent Mater 1995 ; 11: 117–125.
5. 5 Bouillaguet S, Ciucchi B, Jacoby T, Wataha JC, Pashley D. Bonding characteristics to dentin walls of Class II cavities, invitro. Dent Mater 2001 ; 17: 316–321.
6. 6 Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001 ; 3: 237–245.
7. 7 Schreiner RF, Chappell RP, Glaros AG, Eick JD. Microtensile testing of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998 ; 14: 194–201.
8. 8 Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, Ciucchi B, Russel CM, Pashley DH. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries‐affected dentin using adhesives. J Dent Res 1995 ; 74: 1679–1688.
9. 9 Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Regional bond strength of resin to human root dentin. J Dent Res 1996 ; 24: 435–442.
10. 10 Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Johnson MH, Pashley DH. Regional bond strength of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. JDent Res 1996 ; 75: 1404–1413.
11. 11 Zhang Y, Agee K, Nör J, Sachar B, Russel C, Pashley DH. Effect of acid etching on the tensile properties of demineralized dentin matrix. Dent Mater 1998 ; 14: 222–228.
12. 12 Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of surface area on resin–enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 1997 ; 13: 290–296.
13. 13 Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self‐etching adhesives. Part II. Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001 ; 17: 430–444.
14. 14 Shono Y, Ogawa T, Terashita M, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Regional measurement of resin–dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res 1999 ; 78: 669–705.
15. 15 Tay F, King NM, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effect of delayed activation of light‐cured resin composites on bonding of all‐ in‐one adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2001 ; 3: 207–225.
16. 16 Tay FR, Smales RJ, Ngo H, Wei SHY, Pashley DH. Effect of different conditioning protocols on adhesion of a GIC to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001 ; 3: 153–166.
17. 17 Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. The influence of water storage and C‐factor on the dentin–resin composite microtensile bond strength and debond pathway utilizing a filled and unfilled adhesive resin. Dent Mater 2001 ; 17: 268–276.
18. 18 Armstrong SR, Boyer DB, Keller JC. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1998 ; 14: 44–50.
19. 19 Armstrong SR, Keller JC, Boyer DB. Mode of failure in the dentin–adhesive resin–resin composite bonded joint as determined by strength‐based (TBS) and fracture‐based (CNSB) mechanical testing. J Dent 2001 ; 17: 201–210.
20. 20 De Hoff PH, Anusavice KJ, Wang Z. Three‐dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test. Dent Mater 1995 ; 11: 126–131.
21. 21 Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CAO, Suh B, Pashley DH. Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent 2000 ; 2: 251–257.
22. 22 Mannocci F, Scheriff M, Ferrari M, Watson TW. Microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy of dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentin. Am J Dent 2001 ; 14: 100–104.
23. 23 Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross‐sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998 ; 14: 212–221.
24. 24 Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F. Themicrotensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999 ; 1: 299–309.