Microtensile bond strength and confocal microscopy of dental adhesives bonded to root canal dentin

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 200-204

  Mannocci, Francesco ^a   Sherriff, Martyn ^b   Ferrari, Marco ^a   Watson, Timothy F ^b  

^a Guy's Hospital ^*

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMAN; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PERMEABILITY;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN PERMEABILITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035434419     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28-35.
2. Lewis R, Smith BG. A clinical survey of post-retained crowns. Br Dent J 1988; 165:95-97.
3. Fox K, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root canal treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J 1997; 30, 361-368.
4. Torbjöner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44.
5. Abou-Rass M. Post and core restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Curr Opin Dent 1992; 2: 99-107.
6. Goldman M, De Vitre R, White R, et al. An SEM study of posts cemented with an unfilled resin. J Dent Res 1984; 1003-1005.
7. Chapman KW, Worley IL, Von Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:649-652.
8. Ben-Amar A, Gontar G, Fitzig S, et al. Retention of dowels using Conclude composite resin as a luting medium. Dent Mater 1986;2:118-120.
9. Hill GL, Zidan O, Duerst L. Retention of etched base metals dowels with resin cement and bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 691-693.
10. Nasar HH, Eskander ME, Zake AM. The luting efficacy of cements in bonding dowels of different metals. Egypt Dent J 1987; 33: 155-171.
11. Brown JD, Mitchem JC. Retentive properties of dowel post systems. Oper Dent 1987; 12:15-19.
12. Sano H, Shono T, Sonada H, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a microtensile test. Dent Mater 1994;10: 236-240.
13. Kinloch AJ. The science of adhesion. Part 1. Surface and interfacial aspects. J Mater Sci 1980; 15: 2141-2166.
14. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrecths P, et al. A TEM study of two water based adhesive systems bonded to dry and wet dentin. J Dent Res 1998;77:50-59.
15. Perdigão J. An ultra-morphological study of human dentine exposed to adhesive systems. Thesis 1995; Leuven, Belgium.
16. Watanabe I. Photocure bonding agents to ground dentin. J Jpn Dent Mater 1992; 955-973.
17. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 1212-1220.
18. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, et al. Regional bond strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1404-1413.
19. Mannocci F, Innocenti M, Ferrari M, et al. Confocal and scanning electron microscopic study of teeth endodontically treated and restored with fiber posts, metal posts and composite resins. J Endod 1999;25:789-794.
20. Finger WJ, Inoue M, Asmussen E. Effect of wettability of adhesive resins on bonding to dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:35-38.
21. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25: 355-372.
22. Pereira PNR, Okuda M, Sano H, et al. Effect of intrinsic wetness and regional difference on dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 1999;15:46-53.