Choosing and evaluating technology policy: A multicriteria approach

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 13-23

  Biggiero, Lucio ^a   Laise, Domenico ^b  

^a LUISS UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; POLICY ANALYSIS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 0037967296     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154303781780641     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Anderson, T (1998), "Managing a systems approach to technology and innovation policy", in OECD (1998) pages 9-30.
2. Archibugi, D, J Howells and J Michie (editors) (1999), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
3. Arrow, J K (1962), "Welfare economics and the allocation of resources for invention", in R Nelson (editor), The Rate and Direction of Inventice Activity (Princeton University Press, Princeton) pages 164-181.
4. Arthur, B (1994), Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).
5. Baraczyk, H, P Cook and R Heidenreich (editors) (1996), Regional Innovation Systems (University of London Press, London).
6. Becher, G, and S Kuhlmann (editors) (1995), Evaluation of Technology Policy Programmes in Germany (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
7. Belton, V, and T J Stewart (2001), Multiple Criteria Decision Making (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
8. Biggiero, L, and D Laise (2002a), "Organizational behavior and multi-criteria decision aid", paper presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of The European Academy of Management, Stockholm, 9-11 May.
9. Biggiero, L, and D Laise (2002b), "Choosing the structure: a multicriteria methodology", Luiss International Journal, forthcoming.
10. Bogan, C, and M J English (1994), Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation (MacGraw-Hill, New York).
11. Bouyssou, D (editor) (2001), Alding Decisions with Multiple Criteria (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
12. Boxwell, R J jr (1994), Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage (McGraw-Hill, New York).
13. Bozeman, B (2000), "Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory", Research Policy, 29, pages 627-655.
14. Cimoli, M, and G Dosi (1995), "Technological paradigms, patterns of learning and development: an introductory roadmap", Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5(3), pages 243-268.
15. Cochrane, J, and M Zeleny (editors) (1973), Multiple Criteria Decision Making (University of South Carolina Press, Columbia).
16. Cooke, P, M G Uranga and G Etxebarria (1997), "Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions", Research Policy, 26, pages 475-491.
17. Cowling, K (editor) (1999), Industrial Policy in Europe (Routledge, London).
18. De la Mothe, J, and G Paquet (editors) (1996), Evolutionary Economics and the New International Political Economy (Pinter, London).
19. Despontin, M (1982), "Regional multiple objective quantitative economic policy: a Belgian model", European Journal of Operational Research, 10(1), pages 82-89.
20. Edquist, C (editor) (1997), Systems of Innovation (Pinter, London).
21. Eggertsson, T (1990), Economic Behavior and Institutions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
22. England, R R (editor) (1994), Evolutionary Concepts in Contemporary Economics (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).
23. Etzkowitz, H, and L Leydesdorff (1997), Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (Cassell Academic, London).
24. Etzkowitz, H, and L Leydesdorff (2000), "The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations", Research Policy, 29, pages 109-123.
25. Fandel, G, and J Spronk (editors) (1985), Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications (Springer, Berlin).
26. Freeman, C (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (Pinter, London).
27. Georghiou, L, and D Roessner (2000), "Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods" Research Policy, 29, pages 657-678.
28. Griliches, Z (1990), "Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey", Journal of Economic Literature, XXVIII, pages 1661-1707.
29. Hodgson, G M (1988), Economics and Institutions: a Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics (Polity Press, Cambridge).
30. Hodgson, G M (1993), Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics (The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor).
31. Laise, D, and P A Valentino (2000), Economia dell'impresa: le scelte di investimento (Carocci, Roma).
32. Larichev, O I, and D L Olson (2001), Multiple Criteria Analysis in Strategic Siting Problems (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
33. Leydesdorff, L, and H Etzkowitz (1996), "Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations", Science and Public Policy, 23(5(, October, pages 279-286.
34. Leydesdorff, L, and H Etzkowitz (1998), "The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies", Science and Public Policy, 25(3), June, pages 195-203.
35. Link, A N (1996), Evaluating Public Sector Research and Development (Praeger, New York).
36. Lipsey, R G (1998), "Technology policies in neo-classical and structuralist-evolutionary models", in OECD (1998) pages 31-74.
37. Lundvall, B A (editor) (1992), National Systems of Innovation (Pinter, London).
38. Lundvall, B A (1999), "Technology policy in the learning economy", in D Archibugi, J Howells and J Michie (editors), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) pages 19-34.
39. Lundvall, B A, and M Tomlinson (2000), "International benchmarking and national innovation systems", unpublished paper, Roskilde University, Denmark.
40. Malerba, F, and S Torrisi (2000), "La politica pubblica", in F Malerba (editor), Economia dell'innovazione (Carocci, Rome) pages 405-434.
41. Metcalfe, J S (1995), "The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives", in P Stoneman (editor), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Blackwell, London).
42. Metcalfe, J S (1998), Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction (Routledge, London).
43. Metcalfe, J S, and L Georghiou (1998), "Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy", in OECD (1998) pages 75-100.
44. Meyer-Krahmer, F, and F Montigny (1990), "Evaluations of innovation programs in selected European countries", Research Policy, 18, pages 313-332.
45. Mowery, D C, and A A Ziedonis (1998), "Market failure or market magic? Structural change in the US National Innovation System", in OECD (1998) pages 101-136.
46. Nelson, R R (1987), Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process (Elsevier, Amsterdam).
47. Nelson, R R (editor) (1993), National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
48. Nelson, R R (1995), "Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change", Journal of Economic Literature, 33, pages 48-90.
49. Nelson, R R, and S Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (Belknap Press, Cambridge).
50. North, D C (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
51. OECD (1998), STI: Special Issue on "New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy" (OECD, Paris).
52. OECD (2000), Main Science and Technology Indicators (OECD, Paris).
53. Papaconstantinou, G, and W Polt (1997), "Policy evaluation in innovation and technology: an overview", in OECD Proceedings, Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology: Towards Best Practices (OECD, Paris).
54. Park, Y (1999), "R&D structure. A taxonomy of national systems of innovation: R&D structure of OECD economies", Science and Public Policy, 26(4), August, pages 241-246.
55. Patel, P, and K Pavitt (1994), "National innovation systems: why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared", Economic Innovation and New Technology, 3, pages 77-95.
56. Peterson, J, and M Sharp (1998), Technology Policy in the European Union (Macmillan, Basingstoke).
57. Pomerol, J C, and S Barba Romero (2000), Multicriteria Decision in Management (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
58. Rosenberg, N (1994), Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
59. Rowlinson, M (1997), Organisations and Institutions (MacMillan, London).
60. Roy, B (1985), Methodologie multicritere d'aide a la decision (Economica, Paris).
61. Roy, B (1996), Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
62. Roy, B, and D Bouyssou (1985), "Comparison of a multi-attribute utility and an outranking model applied to a nuclear power plant siting example", in Y Y Heimes and V Chankong (editors), Decision Making with Multiple Objectives (Springer, Berlin) pages 482-494.
63. Roy, B, and D Bouyssou (1993), Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas (Economica, Paris).
64. Rutherford, M (1994), Institutions in Economics: the Old and the New Institutionalism (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
65. Schmalensee, R, and R D Willig (editors) (1989), Handbook of Industrial Organization (North Holland, Amsterdam).
66. Simon, H A (1969), The Science of the Artificial (MIT Press, Cambridge MA).
67. Simon, H A (1983), Reason in Human Affairs (Stanford University Press, Stanford CA).
68. Simon, H A (1997), Models of Bounded Rationality, vol. 3 :Empirically Grounded Economic Reason (MIT Press, New York).
69. Teubal, M (1998), "Policies for promoting enterprise restructuring in national systems of innovation: triggering cumulative learning and generating system effects", in OECD (1998) pages 137-169.
70. Triantaphyllou, E (2000), Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
71. Vincke, P (1992), Multicriteria Decision-aid (Wiley, New York).
72. Vonortas, N S (2000), "Industry competitiveness, Science and Public Policy, 27(2), April, pages 97-108.