Therapeutic Jurisprudence: An Invitation to Social Scientists

Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts: Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 579-601

  Petrucci, Carrie J ^a   Winick, Bruce J ^b   Wexler, David B ^c,d  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958256817     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/0470013397.ch25     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Anderson, E., Levine, M., Sharma, A., Feretti, L., Steinberg, K. and Wallach, L. (1996). Coercive uses of mandatory reporting in therapeutic relationships. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 895-906). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
2. Bazemore, G. and Schiff, M. (2001). Restoring community justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing Co.
3. Berk, S.F., Campbell, A., Klap, R. and Western B. (1992). Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse abuse experiment. Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 170-200.
4. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
5. Braithwaite, J. (2000). Decomposing a holistic viewof restorative justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 3 (4), 433-440.
6. Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38 (2), 244-262.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Buzawa, E.S. and Buzawa, C.G. (1996). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Casey, P. and Rottman, D.B. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence in the courts. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18 (4), 445-458.
10. Chase, D.J. and Hora, P.F. (2000). The implications of therapeutic jurisprudence for judicial satisfaction. Court Review, 37 (1), 12-20.
11. Cherryholmes, C.C. (1992). Notes on pragmatism and scientific realism. Educational Researcher, 21, 13-17.
12. Cohen, F. and Dvoskin, J.A. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and corrections: A glimpse. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 777-804.
13. Daicoff, S. (2000). The role of therapeutic jurisprudence within the comprehensive law movement. In D.P. Stolle, D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 465-492). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
14. Daly-Rooney, R.A. (1996). Designing reasonable accommodations through co-worker participation: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the confidentiality provision of the Americans with Disabilities Act. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 365-383). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
15. Dorfman, D. (1993). Effectively implementing Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act for mentally disabled persons: A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis. Journal of Law and Health, 8, 105-120.
16. Dunford, F.W., Huizinga, D. and Elliott, D. (1989). The Omaha domestic violence police experiment: Final report to the National Institute of Justice and the City of Omaha. Boulder, CO: Institute of Behavioral Science.
17. Feldthusen, B. (1993). The civil action for sexual battery: Therapeutic jurisprudence? Ottawa Law Review, 25, 203-234.
18. Ferencz, N. and McGuire, J. (2000). Mental health review tribunals in the UK: Applying a therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Court Review, 37 (1), 48-52.
19. Fritzler, R.B. (in press). How one misdemeanor mental health court incorporates therapeutic jurisprudence, preventive law, and restorative justice. In J.M. Moore (ed.), Management and administration of correctional health care: Policy, practice, administration. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
20. Fritzler, R.B. and Simon, L.M.J. (2000). Creating a domestic violence court: Combat in the trenches. Court Review, 37 (1), 28-39.
21. Gould, K.A. (1993). Turning rat and doing time for uncharged, dismissed, or acquitted crimes: Do the federal sentencing guidelines promote respect for the law? New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 835-875.
22. Greene, J.C. (1994). Qualitative program evaluation. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Greer, A., O'Regan, M. and Traverso, A. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence and patients' perceptions of procedural due process of civil commitment hearings. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 923-934). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
24. Hirschel, J.D., Hutchison, I.W., Dean, C.W., Kelley, J.J. and Pesackis, C.E. (1991). Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report (Grant No. 89IJ-CK-K004). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
25. Holmberg, U. and Christianson, S.A. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20 (1/2), 31-45.
26. Hora, P.F., Schma, W. and Rosenthal, J.T.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review, 74, 439-555.
27. House, E.R. (1994). Integrating the quantitative and qualitative. In C.S. Reichart and S.F. Rallis (eds), The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (pp. 13-22). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
28. Howe, K.R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17, 10-16
29. Kazi, M.A.F. (2000). Contemporary perspectives in the evaluation of practice. British Journal of Social Work, 30 (6), 755-768.
30. Keilitz, S. (2000). Specialization of Domestic Violence Case Management in the Courts: A National Survey. National Center for State Courts.
31. Kennedy, C.J. (2001). The perception and role of the involuntary civil commitment hearing through the eyes of the petitioner: Procedural versus distributive justice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara.
32. Klotz, J.A. (1991). Limiting the psychotherapist-patient privilege: The therapeutic potential. Criminal Law Bulletin, 27, 416-433.
33. Kress, K. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the resolution of value conflicts: What we can realistically expect, in practice, from theory. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 555-588.
34. Lurigio, A.J.,Watson, A., Luchins, D.J. and Hanrahan, P. (2001). Therapeutic jurisprudence in action: Specialized courts for the mentally ill. Judicature, 84 (4), 184-189.
35. Manicas, P.T. and Secord, P.F. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 399-413.
36. Melton, G. (1994). Therapy through law. Contemporary Psychology, 39, 215-216.
37. Mills, L.G. (1999). Killing her softly: Intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Review, 113, 550-587.
38. Monahan, J. and Walker, L. (1986). Social authority: Obtaining, evaluating, and establishing social science in law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 134 (3), 477-517.
39. Monahan, J. and Walker, L. (1998). Social Science in Law (4th edn). Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press, Inc.
40. Murphy, J.P. (1990). Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson. Boulder, CO: Westview.
41. NIJ Research Report (1998 July). Legal interventions in family violence: Research findings and policy implications. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. NCJ 171666.
42. O'Reilly, J. and Sales, B.D. (1986). Setting physical standards for mental hospitals: To whom should the courts listen? International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 8, 301-309.
43. O'Reilly, J. and Sales, B.D. (1987). Privacy for the institutionalized mentally ill: Are courtordered standards effective? Law and Human Behavior, 11, 41-53.
44. Pate, A. and Hamilton, E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691-697.
45. Pepper, S.C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study of evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press.
46. Pepper, S.C. (1967). Concept and quality: A world hypothesis. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
47. Perlin, M.L. (2000). The hidden prejudice: Mental disability on trial. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
48. Petrucci, C. (2002). Respect as a component in the judge-defendant interaction in a specialized domestic violence court that utilizes therapeutic jurisprudence. Criminal Law Bulletin, 38 (2), 263-295.
49. Poythress, N.G. and Brodsky, S.L. (1993). In the wake of a negligent release law suit: An investigation of professional consequences and institutional impact on a state psychiatric hospital. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 155-173.
50. Poythress, N.G. and Brodsky, S.L. (1996). In the wake of a negligent release law suit: An investigation of professional consequences and institutional impact on a state psychiatric hospital. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 875-894). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
51. Rorty, R. (1982). Pragmatism, relativism, and irrationalism. In R. Rorty (ed.), Consequences of pragmatism (pp. 160-175). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
52. Rosenthal R. and Rosnow, R.L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd edn). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
53. Rottman,D.B. (2000). Special issue on therapeutic jurisprudence [Special issue]. Court Review, 37 (1).
54. Rubin, E.L. (1993). Public choice in practice and theory. California Law Review, 81, 1657- 1672.
55. Saccuzzo, D.P. (1999). How should the police respond to domestic violence? A therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of mandatory arrest. Santa Clara Law Review, 39, 765-787.
56. Sales, B.D. (1983). The legal regulation of psychology: Professional and scientific interactions. In C.J. Scheirer and B.I. Hammonds (eds), Psychology and the law (pp. 9-35).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
57. Sarat, A. (1985). Legal effectiveness and social studies of law: On the unfortunate persistence of research tradition. Legal Studies Forum, 9, 23-31.
58. Scheff, T.J. (1998). Therapeutic jurisprudence forum: Community conferences: Shame and anger in therapeutic jurisprudence. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 67, 97-119.
59. Schopp, R.F. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and conflicts among values in mental health law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 31-45.
60. Schopp, R.F. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Integrated inquiry and instrumental prescriptions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 589-605.
61. Sherman, L.W. and Berk, R.A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
62. Sherman, L.W., Schmidt, J.D., Rogan, D.P., Smith, D.A., Gartin, P.R., Cohn, E.G., Collins, D.J. and Bacich, A.R. (1992). The variable effects of arrest on crime control: The Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 137-169.
63. Shiff, A. and Wexler, D.B. (1996). Teen court:Atherapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Criminal Law Bulletin, 32, 342-357.
64. Shuman, D.W. (1993). Making theworld a better place through tort law: Through the therapeutic looking glass. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 739-747.
65. Shuman, D.W. (1994). The psychology of compensation in tort law. University of Kansas Law Review, 43, 39-77.
66. Shuman, D.W., Hamilton, J.A. and Daley, C.E. (1994). The health effects of jury service. Law and Psychology Review, 18, 267-307.
67. Simon, L.M.J. (1995). Atherapeutic jurisprudence approach to the legal processing of domestic violence cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1 (1), 43-79.
68. Slobogin, C. (1995). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Five dilemmas to ponder. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 193-219.
69. Steinman, M. (1990). Lowering recidivism among men who batter women. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17 (2), 124-132.
70. Stolle, D.P., Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (2000). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
71. Stolle, D.P.,Wexler, D.B.,Winick, B.J. and Dauer, E.A. (1997). Integrating preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A law and psychology based approach to lawyering. California Western Law Review, 34, 15-51.
72. Susman, Jack (1996). Resolving hospital conflicts: A study on therapeutic jurisprudence. In D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 907-922). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
73. Syers, M.S. and Edleson, J.L. (1992). The combined effects of coordinated criminal justice intervention in woman abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7 (4), 490-502.
74. Symposium Issue (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Issues, analysis, and applications. Seattle University Law Review, 24 (2), 215-689.
75. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 46. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
76. Thibaut, J. and Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66, 541-566.
77. Thistlethwaite, A.,Wooldredge, J. and Gibbs, D. (1998). Severity of dispositions and domestic violence recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 44 (3), 388-398.
78. Tolman, R.M. and Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime and Delinquency, 41 (4), 481-495.
79. Tomkins, A.J. and Carson, D. (eds) (1999). International perspectives on therapeutic jurisprudence, Part One [Special issue]. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17 (5).
80. Tomkins, A.J. and Carson, D. (eds). (2000). International perspectives on therapeutic jurisprudence: Part Two [Special issue]. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18 (4).
81. Tyler, T. (1992). The psychological consequences of judicial procedures: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist University Law Review, 46, 433-445.
82. Von Hirsch, A., Bottoms, A.E., Burney, E. and Wikstrom, P.O. (1999). Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
83. Wexler, D.B. (1990). Therapeutic jurisprudence: The law as a therapeutic agent. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
84. Wexler, D.B. (1992a). Justice, mental health, and therapeutic jurisprudence. Cleveland State Law Review, 40, 517-526.
85. Wexler, D.B. (1992b). Putting mental health into mental health law: Therapeutic jurisprudence. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 27-38.
86. Wexler, D.B. (1993a). New directions in therapeutic jurisprudence: Breaking the bounds of conventional mental health lawscholarship. NewYork Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 759-776.
87. Wexler, D.B. (1993b). Therapeutic jurisprudence and changing concepts of legal scholarship. Behavioral Science and the Law, 11, 17-29.
88. Wexler, D.B. (1993c). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the criminal courts. William and Mary Law Review, 35, 279-299.
89. Wexler, D.B. (1994). An orientation to therapeutic jurisprudence. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 20, 259-264.
90. Wexler, D.B. (1995) Reflections on the scope of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 220-236.
91. Wexler, D.B. (2000). Just some juvenile thinking about delinquent behavior: A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to relapse prevention planning and youth advisory juries. UMKC Law Review, 69 (1), 93-105.
92. Wexler, D.B. (2001). Robes and rehabilitation: How judges can help offenders 'make good'. Court Review, 38 (14), 14-19.
93. Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (1991). Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
94. Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (1992). Therapeutic jurisprudence and criminal justice mental health issues. Mental and Physical Disability Law Report, 16, 225-231.
95. Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (1993). Patients, professionals, and the path of therapeutic jurisprudence: A response to Petrila. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights, 10, 907-914.
96. Wexler, D.B. and Winick, B.J. (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
97. Wiebe, R.P. (1996). The mental health implications of crime victims' rights. In D.B.Wexler and B.J. Winick (Eds.) Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence (pp. 213-241). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
98. Winick,B.J. (1997a). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, PublicPolicy and Law, 3 (1), 184-206.
99. Winick, B.J. (1997b). Therapeutic jurisprudence applied: Essays on mental health law. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
100. Winick, B.J. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil commitment hearing. The Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10, 37-60.
101. Winick, B.J. (2000a). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review, 69 (1), 33-91.
102. Winick, B.J. (2000b). Redefining the role of the criminal defense lawyer at plea bargaining and sentencing: A therapeutic jurisprudence/preventive law model. In D.P. Stolle, D.B. Wexler and B.J. Winick (eds), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 245-308). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
103. Winick, B.J. and Wexler, D.B. (in press). Therapeutic jurisprudence and drug treatment courts: A symbiotic relationship. In A.W. Graham and T.K. Schultz (eds), Principles of addiction medicine (3rd edn). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addiction Medicine.
104. Winick, B.J., Wexler, D.B. and Dauer, E.A. (1999). Therapeutic jurisprudence and preventive law: Transforming legal practice and education [Special issue]. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5, 793-1210.
105. Wright, M. (1996). Justice for victims and offenders: A restorative response to crime (2nd edn). Winchester: Waterside Press.
106. Yin, R.K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Volume 34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
107. Zito, J.M., Vitrai, J. and Craig, T.J. (1993). Toward a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis of medication refusal in the court review model. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 11, 151-163.