Delayed predictive accuracy of narrative recall after traumatic brain injury: Salience and explicitness

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 98-112

  Kennedy, Mary R T ^a   Nawrocki, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain injury; Learning; Memory; Metacognition; Metacomprehension; Metamemory; Narrative; Self monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRONTAL LOBE; HEARING ACUITY; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NARRATIVE; SELF MONITORING; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; FEMALE; HEAD INJURY; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RECALL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HEAD INJURIES, CLOSED; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MENTAL RECALL; NARRATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037863766     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/008)     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Agresti, A. A., Corrigan, J. D., & Gribble, M. (1989). Effects of mode of presentation on head-injured patients' recall of narrative information. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 270-276.
2. Allen, C. C., & Ruff, R. M. (1990). Self-rating versus neuropsychological performance on moderate versus severe head-injured patients. Brain Injury, 4, 7-17.
3. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86-87.
4. Ammons, R. B., & Ammons, C. H. (1979). Use and evaluation of the Quick Test (QT): Partial summary. Psychological Reports, 43, 943-946.
5. Barona, A., Reynolds, C. R., & Chastain, R. (1984). A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS-R. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 52, 885-887.
6. Blachstein, H., Vakil, E., & Hoofien, D. (1993). Impaired learning in patients with closed-head injuries: An analysis of components of the acquisition process. Neuropsychology, 7, 530-535.
7. Boake, C., Freeland, J. C., Ringholz, G. M., Nance, M. L., & Edwards, K. E. (1995). Awareness of memory loss after severe closed-head injury. Brain Injury, 9, 273-283.
8. Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1993). The Discourse Comprehension Test. Tucson, AZ: Communication Skill Builders.
9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Crosson, B., Novak, A. T., Trenerry, M. R., & Craig, P. L. (1988). California Verbal Learning Test (CLVT) performance in severely head-injured and neurologically normal adult males. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 754-768.
11. Darley, F. L., & Spriestersbach, D. C. (1978). Diagnostic methods in speech pathology. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Docking, K., Murdoch, B. E., & Jordan, F. M. (2000). Interpretation and comprehension of linguistic humour by adolescents with head injury: A group analysis. Brain Injury, 14, 89-108.
13. Dunlosky, J., & Hertzog, C. (2000). Updating knowledge about encoding strategies: A componential analysis of learning about strategy effectiveness from task experience. Psychology and Aging, 15, 462-474.
14. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed JOL effect. Memory & Cognition, 20, 374-380.
15. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565.
16. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1997). Similarity between the cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the cue for test is not the primary determinant of JOL accuracy. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 34-49.
17. Glenberg, A. M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C. (1987). Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 119-136.
18. Gonzalez, R., & Nelson, T. O. (1996). Measuring ordinal association in situations that contain tied scores. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 159-165.
19. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
20. Hanten, G., Bartha, M., & Levin, H. (2000). Metacognition following pediatric traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 18, 383-398.
21. Haut, M. W., Petros, T. V., & Frank, R. G. (1990). The recall of prose as a function of importance following closed head injury. Brain Injury, 4, 281-288.
22. Haut, M. W., & Shutty, M. S. (1992). Patterns of verbal learning after closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 6, 51-58.
23. Johnson, R. E. (1970). Recall of prose as a function of the linguistic units. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 12-20.
24. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Kennedy, M. R. T. (2001). Retrospective confidence judgements made by adults with traumatic brain injury: Relative and absolute accuracy. Brain Injury, 15, 1-19.
27. Kennedy, M. R. T., Carney, E., & Peters, S. M. (2002). Self-monitoring and study strategy decisions after brain injury. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28. Kennedy, M. R. T., & Yorkston, K. M. (2000). Accuracy of metamemory after traumatic brain injury: Predictions during verbal learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1072-1086.
29. Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
30. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
31. Levin, H. S., & Goldstein, F. C. (1986). Organization of verbal memory after severe closed-head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 643-656.
32. Luria, A. R. (1980). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic.
33. Maki, R. H. (1995). Accuracy of metacomprehension judgements for questions of varying importance levels. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 327-344.
34. Maki, R. H. (1998a). Text predictions over test material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Maki, R. H. (1998b). Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and tests. Memory & Cognition, 26, 959-964.
36. Maki, R. H., & Swett, S. (1987). Metamemory for narrative text. Memory & Cognition, 15, 72-83.
37. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Dunay, P. K., & Cobb, R. E. (1986). Encoding difficulty and memory: Toward a unifying theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 645-656.
38. McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53, 81-104.
39. McGuire, M. J., & Maki, R. H. (2001). When knowing more means less: The effect of fan on metamemory judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1172-1179.
40. McNeil, M. R., & Kimelman, M. D. Z. (1986). Toward an integrative information-processing structure of auditory comprehension and processing in adult aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 7, 123-146.
41. Metcalfe, J. (1994). Metacognition and novelty monitoring. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 137-156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Millis, S. R., & Ricker, J. H. (1994). Verbal learning patterns in moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 498-507.
43. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133.
44. Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people's judgements of learning (JOL) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The "delayed JOL effect." Psychological Science, 2, 267-270.
45. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213.
46. Newman, A. C., Garmoe, W., Beatty, P., & Ziccardi, M. (2000). Self-awareness of traumatically brain injured patients in the acute inpatient rehabilitation setting. Brain Injury, 14, 333-344.
47. Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Comprehension of spoken narrative discourse by adults with aphasia, right-hemisphere damage, or traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 69-81.
48. Pearce, S., McDonald, S., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Interpreting ambiguous advertisements: The effect of frontal lobe damage. Brain & Cognition, 38, 150-154.
49. Prigatano, G. P., & Altman, I. M. (1990). Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 1058-1064.
50. Reid, D. B., & Kelly, M. P. (1993). Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised in close head injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 245-254.
51. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstad-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
52. Schreiber, W. (1998). Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 26, 553-571.
53. Shum, D., Valentine, M., & Cutmore, T. (1999). Performance of individuals with severe long-term traumatic brain injury on time-, event-, and activity-based prospective memory tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21, 49-58.
54. Squire, L. (1992). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 232-243.
55. Stuss, D. T. (1991). Disturbance of self-awareness after frontal system damage. In G. P. Prigatano & D. L. Schacter (Eds.), Awareness of deficit after brain injury (pp. 64-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
56. Stuss, D. T., & Gow, C. A. (1992). "Frontal dysfunction" after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 5, 272-282.
57. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81-84.
58. Turkstra, L. S., McDonald, S., & Kaufmann, P. M. (1996). Assessment of pragmatic communication skills in adolescence after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 10, 329-345.
59. Vakil, E., Arbell, N., Gozlan, M., Hoofien, D., & Blachstein, H. (1992). Relative importance of informational units and their role in long-term recall by closed-head-injured patients and control groups. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 802-803.
60. Wallsten, T. S. (1996). An analysis of judgment research analyses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 220-226.
61. Weaver, C. A., III, & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23, 12-22.
62. Weaver, C. A., III, & Kelemen, W. L. (1997). Judgments of learning at delays: Shifts in response patterns or increased metamemory accuracy? Psychological Science, 8, 318-321.
63. Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale (rev. ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
64. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.