Cephalometric variables as predictors of class II treatment outcome

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 636-640

  Kim, J C ^a   Mascarenhas, A K ^b   Joo, B H ^b   Vig, Katherine W L ^b   Beck, F M ^b   Vig, P S ^b  

^a Jeon Nam University   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0034566347     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.110520     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fields MJ, editor. Institute of Medicine report: dental education at the crossroads. Washington: National Academy Press; 1995.
2. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
3. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51-61.
4. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62-72.
5. Vig P, Vig K. Decision analysis to optimize the outcomes for Class II Division 1 orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995;139-48.
6. O'Brien KD, Robbins R, Vig KWL, Vig P, Shnorhokian H, Weyant R. The effectiveness of Class II Division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dent Orthop 1995;107:329-34.
7. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephans CD, et al. The PAR index, reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125-39.
8. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O'Brien KD. The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:1-10.
9. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry, University of Iowa;1986.
10. Younis JW, Vig KWL, Richuse DJ, Weyant RJ. A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:358-62.
11. Begun F, Vig KWL, Beck FM, Kuthy R, Wade D. Comparison of three occlusal indices of orthodontic treatment need. J Dent Res 1997;76:161.
12. Birkeland K, Furevik J, Egil Boe O, Wisth PJ. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR index. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:279-88.
13. Vig KWL, Bennett ME, O'Brien K, Vayda D, Vig PS, Weyant RJ. Orthodontic process and outcomes: efficacy and effectiveness studies. In: Trotman C-A, McNamara JA, editors. Orthodontic treatment: outcome and effectiveness. Vol 30 (Craniofacial Growth Series). Ann Arbor: Center of Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1995.
14. Fink DF, Smith RJ. The duration of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:45-51.
15. Bennett ME, Michael C, O'Brien K, Weyant R, Phillips C, Vig KD. Measuring beliefs about orthodontic treatment: a questionnaire approach. J Pub Health Dent 1997;57:1-9.
16. Vallera J, Nelson S. Orthodontists' consensus regarding cephalometric variables in diagnosis and treatment planning. J Dent Res 1997;76:160.
17. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KWL, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O'Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:172-6.
18. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed. (Vol 2). Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 1989. p. 1399.
19. Kim JC, Buchsieb W, Vig K, Beck FM, Vig P. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome. J Dent Res 1997;76:128.
20. Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:151-62.
21. Han UK, Vig KWL, Weintraub JA, Vig PS, Kowalski CJ. Consistency of orthodontic treatment decision relative to diagnostic records. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:212-9.
22. Kiser R, Vig K, Woodford B, Evalt L, Buchsieb W, Beck F. Retrospective studies of orthodontic outcome: partial vs. full records cases. J Dent Res 1997;76:126.