Effect of grammatical gender on visual word recognition: Evidence from lexical decision and eye movement experiments

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 407-419

  Colé, Pascale ^a   Pynte, Joël ^b   Andriamamonjy, Pascale ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE SAVOIE   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RANDOMIZATION; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; MALE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 0037831167     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194572     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. AKHUTINA, T., KURGANSKY, A., KURQANSKAYA, M., POLINSKY, M., PLONSKAYA, N., LARINA, O., BATES, E., & APPELBAUM, M. (2001). Processing of grammatical gender in normal and aphasie speakers of Russian. Cortex, 37, 295-326.
2. AKHUTINA, T., KURGANSKY, A., POLINSKY, M., & BATES, E. (1999). Processing of grammatical gender in a three-gender system: Experimental evidence from Russian. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 695-713.
3. ANDREWS, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 802-814.
4. ARNOLD, J. E., EISENBAND, J. G., BROWN-SCHMIDT, S., & TRUESWELL, J. C. (2000). The rapid use of gender information: Evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking. Cognition, 76, B13-B26.
5. ARRIVÉ, M., GADET, F., & GALMICHE, M. (1985). La grammaire d'au-jourd'hui. In Guide alphabétique de la langue française. Paris: Flammarion.
6. BALOTA, D. A., & CHUMBLEY, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89-106.
7. BATES, E., DEVESCOVI, A., HERNANDEZ, A., & PIZZAMIOLIO, L. (1996). Gender priming in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 85, 992-1004.
8. BATES, E., DEVESCOVI, A., PIZZAMIGLIO, L., D'Amico, S., & HERNANDEZ, A. (1995). Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 847-862.
9. BATES, E., MARANGOLO, P., PIZZAMIOLIO, L., & DICK, F. (2001). Linguistic and nonlinguistic priming in aphasia. Brain & Language, 76, 62-69.
10. BLUMSTEIN, S. E., MILBERG, W. P., DWORETZKY, B., ROSEN, A., & GERSHBERG, F. (1991). Syntactic priming effects in aphasia: An investigation of local syntactic dependencies. Brain & Language, 40, 393-421.
11. CACCIARI, C., CARREIRAS, M, & CIONINI, C. B. (1997). When words have two genders: Anaphor resolution for Italian functionally ambiguous words. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 517-532.
12. CARREIRAS, M., GARNHAM, A., & OAKHILL, J. (1993). The use of superficial and meaning-based representations in interpreting pronouns: Evidence from Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 93-116.
13. COLÉ, P., MAGNAN, A., & GRAINGER, J. (1999). Syllable-sized units in visual word recognition: Evidence from skilled and beginning readers of French. Applied Psycholinguists, 20, 507-532.
14. COLÉ, P., & SEGUI, J. (1994). Grammatical incongruency and vocabulary types. Memory & Cognition, 22, 387-394.
15. CONTENT, A., MOUSTY, P., & RADEAU, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
16. CONTENT, A., & RADEAU, M. (1988). Données statistiques sur la structure orthographique du français. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitiv (Numéro Hors-série).
17. CORBETT, G. G. (1991). Gender (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. DAHAN, D., SWINGLEY, D., TANENHAUS, M. K., & MAGNUSON, J. S. (2000). Linguistic gender and spoken-word recognition in French. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 465-480.
19. DESROCHERS, A. (1986). Genre grammatical et classification nominale. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 224-250.
20. DESROCHERS, A., & BRABANT, M. (1995). Lexical categorization. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 49, 240-262.
21. DESROCHERS, A., & PAIVIO, A. (1990). Le phonéme initial des noms inanimés et son effet sur l'identification du genre grammatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 44, 44-57.
22. DESROCHERS, A., PAIVIO, A., & DESROCHERS, S. (1989). L'effet de la fréquence d'usage des noms inanimés et de la valeur prédictive de leur terminaison sur l'identification du genre. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 43, 62-73.
23. DEUTSCH, A., BENTIN, S., & KATZ, L. (1999). Semantic influence on processing gender agreement: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 515-535.
24. FRIEDERICI, A. D., & JACOBSEN, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 467-483.
25. GARNHAM, A., OAKHILL, J., EHRLICH, M.-F., & CARREIRAS, M. (1995). Representations and processes in the interpretation of pronouns: New evidence from Spanish and French. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 41-62.
26. GROSJEAN, F., DOMMERGUES, J. Y., CORNU, E., GUILLELMON, D., & BESSON, C. (1994). The gender-marking effect in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 590-598.
27. GUILLELMON, D., & GROSJEAN, F. (2001). The gender marking effect in spoken word recognition: The case of bilinguals. Memory & Cognition, 29, 503-511.
28. GURJANOV, M., LUKATELA, G., LUKATELA, K., SAVIC, M., & TURVEY, M. T. (1985). Grammatical priming of inflected nouns by the gender of possessive adjectives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 692-701.
29. JAKUBOWICZ, C., & GOLDBLUM, M. C. (1995). Processing of number and gender inflections by French-speaking aphasies. Brain & Language, 51, 242-268.
30. JAREMA, G., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (1994). Processing articles and pronouns in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from French. Brain & Language, 46, 683-694.
31. KARMILOFF-SMITH, A. (1919). A functional approach to child language: A study of determiners and reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. LYONS, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. MACWHINNEY, B., LEINBACH, J., TARABAN, R., & McDONALD, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 255-277.
34. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D., & WELSH, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63.
35. McCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Pt. 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
36. McDONALD, J. L., & MACWHINNEY, B. (1995). The time-course of anaphor resolution: Effects of implicit verb causality and gender. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 543-566.
37. McRAE, K., JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory & Language, 29, 43-65.
38. MEL'CUK, I. (1993). Cours de morphologie générale (théorique et descriptive): Vol. 1. Introduction et premiére partie: Le mot. Montreal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal.
39. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., McDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model of letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
40. PYNTE, J. (1996). Lexical control of within-word eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 958-969.
41. PYNTE, J., KENNEDY, A., & MURRAY, W. S. (1991). Within-word inspection strategies in continuous reading: Time-course of perceptual, lexical, and contextual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 458-470.
42. SCHRIEFERS, H., FRIEDERICI, A. D., & ROSE, U. (1998). Context effects in visual word recognition: Lexical relatedness and syntactic context. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1292-1303.
43. SÉGUIN, H. (1969). Les marques du genre dans le lexique français écrit contemporain: Compilation des cas et essai de classement. Mémoire de D.E.S. Montréal: Université de Montréal, Département de Linguistique.
44. TANENHAUS, M. K., DELL, S. G., & CARLSON, G. (1987). Context effects and lexical processing: A connectionist approach to modularity. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language processing (pp. 83-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. TUCKER, G. R., LAMBERT, W. E., & RIGAULT, A. A. (1977). The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
46. VIGLIOCCO, G., & ZILLI, T. (1999). Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: The case of gender disagreement in Italian language impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 623-648.
47. ZUBIN, D., & KÖPCKE, K. (1981). Gender: A less arbitrary grammatical category. In R. Hendrick, C. Masek, & M. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting (pp. 439-449). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.