Further evidence on the effects of symbolic distance on Stroop-like interference

Psychological Research

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 62-71

  Pavese, Antonella ^a   Umiltà, Carlo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037805489     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s004260050040     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Atkinson, Campbell, F. W., & Francis, M. R. (1976). The magic number 4 +/-0: A new look at visual numerosity judgements. Perception. 5, 327-334.
2. Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124, 434-452.
3. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122, 371-396.
4. Duncan, E. M., & McFarland, C. E. J. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgements: additive-factors analysis. Memory and Cognition. 8, 612-622.
5. Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypense, F., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importantance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition. 2, 95-110.
6. Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., & Polansky, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in "ignoring" irrelevant information. Memory and Cognition. 7, 86-94.
7. Folk, C. L., Egeth, H., & Kwak, H. (1988). Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing? Perception & Psychophysics. 44, 313-320.
8. Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., & Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 91, 59-65.
9. Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. E. (1979). Perceptual selectivity is task dependent: The pop-out effect poops out. Perception & Psychophysics. 25, 99-110.
10. Francolini, C. M., & Egeth, H. E. (1980). On the nonautomaticity of "automatic" activation: Evidence of selective seeing. Perception & Psychophysics. 27, 331-342.
11. den Heyer, K., & Briand, K. (1986). Priming single digit numbers: Automatic spreading activation dissipates as a function of semantic distance. American Journal of Psychology. 99, 315-340.
12. Kaufman, E., Lord, M., Reese, T., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498-525.
13. Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with colour-naming. American Journal of Psychology. 77, 576-588.
14. Klopfer, D. S. (1996). Stroop interference and color-word similarity. Psychological Science. 7, 150-157.
15. La Heij, W., van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Schreuder, R. (1985). Semantic priming and Stroop-like interference in word-naming tasks. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 11, 62-80.
16. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin. 109, 163-203.
17. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 111, 1-22.
18. Marcel, T., & Forrin, B. (1974). Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 103, 450-460.
19. Morin, R. E., DeRosa, D. V., & Stultz, V. (1967). Recognition memory and reaction time. Acta Psychologica. 27, 298-305.
20. Morton, J. (1969). Categories of interference: Verbal mediation and conflict in card sorting. British Journal of Psychology. 60, 329-346.
21. Moyer, R. S., & Bayer, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the Symbolic Distance Effect. Cognitive Psychology. 8, 228-246.
22. Moyer, R. S., & Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for Judgements of numerical inequality. Nature. 215, 1519-1520.
23. Pavese, A., & Umiltà, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
24. Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task. Perception & Psychophysics. 23, 413-419.
25. Schneider, W. (1988). Micro-Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments, and Computers. 20, 84-99.
26. Shepard, R. N., Kilpatric, D. W., & Cunnigham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psychology. 7, 82-138.
27. Shor, R. E. (1971). Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concept domains. Journal of General Psychology. 85, 187-205.
28. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 18, 643-662.
29. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19, 331-351.
30. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review. 101, 80-102.
31. Washburn, D. A. (1994). Stroop-like effects for monkeys and humans: Processing speed or strength of association? Psychological Science. 5, 375-379.
32. Welford, A. T. (1960). The measurement of sensory-motor performance: Survey and reappraisal of twelve years' progress. Ergonomics. 3, 189-230.
33. Windes, J. D. (1968). Reaction time for numerical coding and naming numerals. Journals of Experimental Psychology. 78, 318-322.