Double-pass measurement of retinal image quality in the chicken eye

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 50-57

  Coletta, Nancy J ^a   Marcos, Susana ^b   Wildsoet, Christine ^c   Troilo, David ^a  

^a NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b INSTITUTO DE ÓPTICA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aberrations; Animal model; Chicken; Modulation transfer function; Myopia; Optical quality; Refractive error

Indexed keywords

CHARGE COUPLED DEVICES; LIGHT MODULATION; LIGHT REFRACTION; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; OPTICAL TRANSFER FUNCTION;

RETINA;

IMAGE QUALITY;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE QUALITY; MEASUREMENT; MODULATION TRANSFER FUNCTION; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; OPTICS; OPTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EYEGLASSES; MYOPIA; REFRACTION, OCULAR; RETINA; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 0346034836     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200301000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Collins MJ, Wildsoet CF, Atchison DA. Monochromatic aberrations and myopia. Vision Res 1995;35:1157-63.
2. He JC, Gwiazda J, Held R, Thorn F. Wave-front aberrations in the cornea and the whole eye for emmetropes and myopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S99.
3. Marcos S, Barbero S, Llorente L. The sources of optical aberrations in myopic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:S1510.
4. Bartmann M, Schaeffel F. A simple mechanism for emmetropization without cues from accommodation or colour. Vision Res 1994;34:873-6.
5. Hung LF, Wallman J, Smith EL III. Vision-dependent changes in the choroidal thickness of macaque monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:1259-69.
6. Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Visual optics in normal and ametropic chickens. Clin Vision Sci 1988;3:83-98.
7. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Curry TA, Callender MG. Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days. J Comp Physiol (A) 1996;179:185-94.
8. Campbell MC, Priest D, Hunter JJ. The importance of monochromatic aberrations to detecting defocus in retinal images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:S98.
9. Wilson BJ, Decker KE, Roorda A. Monochromatic aberrations provide an odd-error cue to focus direction. J Opt Soc Am (A) 2002;19: 833-9.
10. Bonds AB. Optical quality of the living cat eye. J Physiol 1974;243: 777-95.
11. Artal P, Herreros de Tejada P, Munoz Tedo C, Green DG. Retinal image quality in the rodent eye. Vis Neurosci 1998;15:597-605.
12. Campbell FW, Gubisch RW. Optical quality of the human eye. J Physiol (Lond) 1966;186:558-78.
13. Santamaria J, Artal P, Bescos J. Determination of the point-spread function of human eyes using a hybrid optical-digital method. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1987;4:1109-14.
14. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks. Vision Res 1996;36:1023-36.
15. Nickla DL, Wildsoet C, Wallman J. Visual influences on diurnal rhythms in ocular length and choroidal thickness in chick eyes. Exp Eye Res 1998;66:163-81.
16. Artal P, Marcos S, Navarro R, Williams DR. Odd aberrations and double-pass measurements of retinal image quality. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1995;12:195-201.
17. Artal P, Iglesias I, Lopez-Gil N, Green DG. Double-pass measurements of the retinal-image quality with unequal entrance and exit pupil sizes and the reversibility of the eye's optical system. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1995;12:2358-66.
18. Green DG, Campbell FW. Effect of focus on the visual response to a sinusoidally modulated spatial stimulus. J Opt Soc Am 1965;55:1154-7.
19. Charman WN, Jennings JA. The optical quality of the monochromatic retinal image as a function of focus. Br J Physiol Opt 1976;31:119-34.
20. Guirao A, Gonzalez C, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Artal P. Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:203-13.
21. Deeley RJ, Drasdo N, Charman WN. A simple parametric model of the human ocular modulation transfer function. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1991;11:91-3.
22. Williams DR. Visibility of interference fringes near the resolution limit. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1985;2:1087-93.
23. Thibos LN, Bradley A, Zhang X. Effect of ocular chromatic aberration on monocular visual performance. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68: 599-607.
24. Navarro R, Artal P, Williams DR. Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity. J Opt Soc Am (A) 1993;10:201-12.
25. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5-25.
26. Over R, Moore D. Spatial acuity of the chicken. Brain Res 1981;211:424-6.
27. Johnson HM. Visual pattern-discrimination in the vertebrate: II. Comparative visual acuity in the dog, the monkey and the chick. J Animal Behav 1914;4:340-61.
28. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in the chick using an optokinetic nystagmus paradigm. Vision Res 1998;38:2629-34.
29. Troilo D, Xiong M, Crowley JC, Finlay BL. Factors controlling the dendritic arborization of retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci 1996;13:721-33.
30. Ehrlich D. Regional specialization of the chick retina as revealed by the size and density of neurons in the ganglion cell layer. J Comp Neurol 1981;195:643-57.
31. Snyder AW, Miller WH. Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power. J Opt Soc Am 1977;67:696-8.
32. Pettigrew JD, Dreher B, Hopkins CS, McCall MJ, Brown M. Peak density and distribution of ganglion cells in the retinae of microchiropteran bats: implications for visual acuity. Brain Behav Evol 1988;32:39-56.
33. Schmid KL, Schmid LM, Wildsoet CF, Pettigrew JD. Retinal topography in the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Brain Behav Evol 1992;39:8-16.
34. Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF. Contrast and spatial-frequency requirements for emmetropization in chicks. Vision Res 1997;37:2011-21.
35. McLellan JS, Marcos S, Prieto PM, Burns SA. Imperfect optics may be the eye's defence against chromatic blur. Nature 2002;417:174-6.
36. Bueno JM, Priest D, Campbell MCW. Optical aberrations of the eye as a function of refractive error in young subjects (Abstract WO4). OSA Annual Meeting Conference Program, 2000. Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 2000:100.
37. Llorente L, Marcos S, Barbero S, Mareyo-Lloves J. How total and corneal aberrations change with standard LASIK surgery for hyperopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:S2066.
38. Artal P, Guirao A, Berrio E, Williams DR. Compensation of corneal aberrations by internal optics in the human eye. J Vis 2001;1:1-8. Available at: http://journalofvision.org/1/1/1. Accessed October 7, 2002.
39. Priolo S, Sivak JG, Kuszak JR, Irving EL. Effects of experimentally induced ametropia on the morphology and optical quality of the avian crystalline lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3516-22.
40. Choh V, Sivak JG. Optical changes of accommodating lenses in myopic chicks. In: Thorn F, Troilo D, Gwiazda J, eds. Myopia 2000: Proceedings of the VIII International Conference on Myopia. Boston: New England College of Optometry Press, 2000:279-82.
41. Schaeffel F, Diether S. The growing eye: an autofocus system that works on very poor images. Vision Res 1999;39:1585-9.
42. Coletta NJ, Marcos S, Wildsoet C, Troilo D, Burns SA. Optical quality of the chicken eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:S738.