Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 529-537

  Ischebeck, Anja ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0037634194     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196094     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ALGOM, D., DEKEL, A., & PANSKY, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited. Memory & Cognition, 24, 557-572.
2. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & VAN RIJN, H. (1993). The Celex lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
3. BANKS, W. P., FUJII, M., & KAYRA-STUART, F. (1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 435-447.
4. BESNER, D., & COLTHEART, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English. Neuropsychologia, 17, 467-472.
5. BLANKENBERGER, S., & VORBERG, D. (1997). The single-format assumption in arithmetic fact retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 721-738.
6. CAMPBELL, J. I. D. (1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1-44.
7. CAMPBELL, J. I. D., & CLARK, J. M. (1992). Cognitive number processing: An encoding-complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457-491). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
8. COLTHEART, M., CURTIS, B., ATKINS, P., & HALLER, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
9. DALLAS, M., & MERIKLE, P. (1976). Semantic processing of non-attended visual information. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 30, 15-21.
10. DEHAENE, S. (1989). The psychophysics of numerical comparison: A reexamination of apparently incompatible data. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 557-566.
11. DEHAENE, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1-42.
12. DEHAENE, S. (1996). The organization of brain activations in number comparison: Event-related potentials and the additive factors method. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 47-68.
13. DEHAENE, S., & AKHAVEIN, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 314-326.
14. DEHAENE, S., BOSSINI, S., & GIRAUX, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371-396.
15. DEHAENE, S., DUPOUX, E., & MEHLER, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogueical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 626-641.
16. DEN HEYER, K., & BRIAND, K. (1986). Priming single digit numbers: Automatic spreading activation dissipates as a function of semantic distance. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 315-340.
17. DUNBAR, K., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 622-639.
18. DUNCAN, E. M., & MCFARLAND, C. E., JR. (1980). Isolating the effects of symbolic distance and semantic congruity in comparative judgments: An additive-factors analysis. Memory & Cognition, 8, 612-622.
19. DYER, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory & Cognition, 1, 106-120.
20. ERIKSEN, B. A., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
21. FERRAND, L. (1999). Why naming takes longer than reading? The special case of Arabic numbers. Acta Psychologica, 100, 253-266.
22. FIAS, W., REYNVOET, B., & BRYSBAERT, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task? Psychological Research, 65, 242-249.
23. FLOWERS, J. H., NELSON, S. M., CARSON, D., & LARSEN, L. (1984). Automatic and expectancy-based priming effects in a digit naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 65-74.
24. FOLTZ, G. S., POLTROCK, S. E., & POTTS, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 442-453.
25. FOX, L. A., SHOR, R. E., & STEINMAN, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction and numerosity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 59-65.
26. HENIK, A., & TZELGOV, J. (1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10, 389-395.
27. HOLENDER, D., & PEEREMAN, R. (1987). Differential processing of phonographic and logographic single-digit numbers by the two hemispheres. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.), Mathematical disabilities (pp. 43-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. KLEIN, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576-588.
29. KOECHLIN, E., NACCACHE, L., BLOCK, E., & DEHAENE, S. (1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1882-1905.
30. LUCE, R. D. (1986). Reaction times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. LUPKER, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory & Cognition, 7, 485-495.
32. MACDONALD, P. A., & JOORDENS, S. (2000). Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1478-1496.
33. MACLEOD, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
34. MACLEOD, C. M., & DUNBAR, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126-135.
35. MARCEL, T., & FORRIN, B. (1974). Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 450-460.
36. MCCLOSKEY, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107-157.
37. MOYER, R. S., & BAYER, R. H. (1976). Mental comparison and the symbolic distance effect. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 228-246.
38. MOYER, R. S., & LANDAUER, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519-1520.
39. NOËL, M.-P. (1991). Influence des systèmes de notation des nombres sur les méchanismes d'encodage et de traitement numériques [Notational systems for numbers: Impact on the encoding mechanisms and numerical processes]. L'Anné Psychologique, 91, 581-607.
40. PALEF, S. R., & OLSON, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 29, 201-209.
41. PAQUET, L., & LORTIE, C. (1990). Evidence for early selection: Precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 382-388.
42. PAVESE, A., & UMILTÀ, C. (1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1535-1545.
43. PAVESE, A., & UMILTÀ, C. (1999). Further evidence on the onthe effects of symbolic distance on Stroop-like interference. Psychological Research, 62, 62-71.
44. PEEREMAN, R., & HOLENDER, D. (1985). Visual field differences for a number-non-number classification of alphabtic and ideographic stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 197-216.
45. REYNVOET, B., & BRYSBAERT, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191-201.
46. ROSINSKI, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643-647.
47. SCHWARZ, W., & ISCHEBECK, A. (2000). Sequential effects in number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 1606-1621.
48. SCHWARZ, W., & ISCHEBECK, A. (in press). On the relative speed account of number size interference in comparative judgments of numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
49. SMITH, M. C., & MAGEE, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.