Hidden breakdown of linear response: Projections of molecular motions in nonequilibrium simulations of solvation dynamics

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 107, Issue 24, 2003, Pages 4773-4777

  Bedard Hearn, Michael J ^a   Larsen, Ross E ^a   Schwartz, Benjamin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENERGY GAP; RELAXATION PROCESSES; STATISTICAL MECHANICS;

LINEAR RESPONSE; MOLECULAR MOTIONS; SOLVATION;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0037561584     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp034383+     Document Type: Letter

References (39)

1. (a) Maroncelli, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1993, 57, 1.
2. (b) Cho, M.; Fleming, G. R. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1996, 47, 109.
3. (c) Rossky, P. J.; Simon, J. D. Nature 1994, 370, 263.
4. (d) DeBoeij, W. P.; Pshenichnikov, M. S.; Weirsma, D. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 99.
5. Stratt, R. M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12981.
6. Chandler, D. Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics; Oxford University Press: New York, 1987.
7. (a) Maroncelli, M.; Fleming, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 89, 5044.
8. (b) Schwartz, B. J.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 6902.
9. (c) Ladanyi, B. M.; Perng, B.-C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6922
10. Munir, S.; Ladanyi, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100 (46), 18258.
11. Day, T. J. F.; Patey, G. N. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 10937.
12. Laria, D.; Skaf, M. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 300.
13. Aherne, D.; Tran, V.; Schwartz, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104 (22), 5382.
14. (a) Sesé, G.; Padró, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108 (15), 6347.
15. Yamaguchi, T.; Kimura, Y.; Hirota, N. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 111, 4169.
16. (c) Chang, S. L.; Wu, T.-M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000, 324, 381.
17. Nishiyama, K.; Hirata, F.; Okada, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118 (5), 2279.
18. Standard deviations for C(t) were calculated by breaking up the 200 ps equilibrium simulation into 126 10 ps blocks with each starting point separated by 1.5 ps. These blocks were correlated as per eq 2 and then averaged.
19. The excited-state equilibrium enery gap. ΔE(∞), is used to normalize S(t). The dashed curve in Figure 1 and the data in Figures 2 and 4 are normalized to the average energy gap between 7 and 12 ps. The dotted curve in Figure 1 is normalized to the average between 2 and 3 ps.
20. The response curves in Figure 1 are not identical, but they do possess similar early and long-time features. Despite the small deviations, one might expect the underlying dynamics to be very similar, implying LR.
21. Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96 (4), 3093.
22. Steele, W. A. Mol. Phys. 1987, 61 (4), 1031.
23. Ladanyi, B. M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109 (8), 3204.
24. Ladanyi, B. M.; Stratt, R. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 1068.
25. trans(t) refers to the sum of the center of mass translations.
26. Rao, M.; Berne, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1981, 85, 1498.
27. Bedard-Hearn, M. J.; Larsen, R. E.; Schwartz, B. J., manuscript in preparation.
28. Ma, J.; Vanden Bout, D. A.; Berg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 9146.
29. Ciccotti, G.; Ferrario, M.; Ryckaert, J.-P. Mol. Phys. 1982, 47 (6), 1253.
30. Chandrasekhar, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 77 (10), 5073.
31. (a) Barthel, E. R.; Martini, I. B.; Schwartz, B. J J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 112 (21), 9433.
32. (b) Martini, I. B.; Barthel, E. R.; Schwartz, B. J J. Chem. Phys. 2000, 113 (24), 11245.
33. (c) Barthel, E. R.; Martini, I. B.; Schwartz, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105 (49), 11230.
34. Martini, I. B.; Barthel, E. R.; Schwartz, B. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (25), 7622.
35. Chekmarev, D.; Zhao, M.; Rice, S. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109 (2), 768.
36. Dawes, S. B.; Ward, D. L.; Fussa-Rydel, O.; Huang, R.-H.; Dye, J. L. Inorg. Chem. 1989, 28, 2.
37. Pyper, N. C.; Pike, C. G.; Edwards, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1468.
38. Allen, M. P.; Tildesely, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford University Press: New York, 1987.
39. We picked configurations from the ground-state (anion) equilibrium trajectory with an average separation of ∼1 ps and with a minimum separation of 0.5 ps.