On the validity of dielectric continuum models in application to solvation in molecular solvents

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1859-1862

  Milischuk, Anatoli ^a   Matyushov, Dmitry V ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PERMITTIVITY; SATURATION (MATERIALS COMPOSITION); SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS;

CHEMICAL POTENTIAL; DIELECTRIC CONTINUUM MODELS; MOLECULAR SOLVENTS; SOLVATION;

DIELECTRIC MATERIALS;

EID: 0037460235     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1531590     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. M. Born, Z. Phys. 1, 45 (1920).
2. J. G. Kirkwood, J. Chem. Phys. 2, 351 (1934).
3. L. Onsager, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 58, 1486 (1936).
4. We refer here to dielectric models as those which employ the dielectric constant as the single parameter of solvent polarity. There have been several attempts to formulate continuum models of solvation which add a continuum density of quadrupolar moment to the dielectric continum. (a) S. M. Chitanvis, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 9065 (1996)
5. (b) J. Jeon and H. J. Kim, J. Sol. Chem. 30, 849 (2001).
6. L. Onsager, J. Phys. Chem. 43, 189 (1939).
7. M. Shaefer and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 1578 (1996).
8. D. Bashford and D. A. Case, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 51, 129 (2000).
9. D. V. Matyushov and B. M. Ladanyi, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 994 (1999).
10. E. A. Carter and J. T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 5961 (1991)
11. A. Milischuk and D. V. Matyushov, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 2146 (2002).
12. C. J. F. Böttcher, Theory of Electric Polarization Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1973.
13. G. Stell, G. N. Patey, and J. S. Høye, Adv. Chem. Phys. 18, 183 (1981).
14. S. L. Carnie and G. N. Patey, Mol. Phys. 47, 1129 (1982).
15. L. Reynolds, J. A. Gardecki, S. J. V. Frankland, and M. Maroncelli, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 10337 (1996).
16. B.-C. Perng, M. D. Newton, F. O. Raineri, and H. L. Friedman, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 7153 (1996).
17. F. O. Raineri and H. L. Friedman, Adv. Chem. Phys. 107, 81 (1999).
18. D. V. Matyushov and G. A. Voth, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 3630 (1999).
19. I. Read, A. Napper, M. B. Zimmt, and D. H. Waldeck, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 9385 (2000).
20. M. Khajehpour and J. F. Kauffman, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 9512 (2000).
21. S. Dorairaj and H. J. Kim, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 2322 (2002).
22. D. V. Matyushov and M. D. Newton, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 8516 (2001).
23. B. M. Ladanyi and B.-C. Perng, J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 6922 (2002).
24. The Collected Works of Lars Onsager edited by P. C. Hemmer, H. Holden, and S. K. Ratkje (World Scientific, Singapore) 1996, p. 684.
25. N. Mataga, Molecular Interactions and Electronic Spectra Marcel Dekker, New York, 1970.
26. The original Onsager formulation deals with the dielectric properties of bulk polar solvents (Refs. 3 and 23). The elegant solution for the reaction field acting on a dipole presented by Onsager was later applied to dipole solvation (Ref. 24). We refer to the Onsager model only in connection to the calculation of the reaction field.
27. C. G. Gray and K. E. Gubbins, Theory of Molecular Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford) 1984.
28. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon, Oxford) 1996.
29. M. Neumann, Mol. Phys. 57, 97 (1986).
30. D. V. Matyushov and B. M. Ladanyi, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 1362 (1997).
31. B. M. Ladanyi and M. Maroncelli, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 3204 (1998).
32. P. Madden and D. Kivelson, Adv. Chem. Phys. 56, 467 (1984).