Modelling the long-term dynamics of populations and communities of trees in boreal forests based on competition for light and nitrogen

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 176, Issue 1-3, 2003, Pages 355-369

  Chertov, Oleg ^a   Komarov, Alexander ^c   Kolström, Marja ^b   Pitkänen, Sari ^b   Strandman, Harri ^b   Zudin, Sergei ^d   Kellomäki, Seppo ^b  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^c Puchino State University   (Russian Federation)

^d EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Carbon; Forest ecosystem; Long term dynamics; Modelling; Nitrogen; Single tree; Spatially explicit

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ECOSYSTEMS; LIGHT; NITROGEN; SOILS;

NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION (NPP);

FORESTRY;

BOREAL FOREST; CARBON; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FOREST DYNAMICS; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; LIGHT; NITROGEN;

ABIES; BETULA; BETULA PENDULA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0037451694     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00284-0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aerts, R., 1996. Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J. Ecol. 84, 597-608.
2. Ågren, G.I., McMurtrie, R.E., Parton, W.J., Pastor, J., Shugart, H.H., 1991. State of the art of models of production decomposition linkages in conifer and grassland ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 1, 118-138.
3. Alexeev, V.A., 1975. Light Regime of Forest. Nauka, Moscow, 228 pp. (in Russian).
4. Bartelink, H.H., 1998. Simulation of growth and competition in mixed stands of Douglas-fir and beech. Thesis. Landbouwuniversiteit, Wageningen, 222 pp.
5. Botkin, D.B., Janak, J.F., Wallis, J.R., 1972. Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth. J. Ecol. 60, 849-872.
6. Chertov, O.G., 1983a. The mathematical model of single plant ecosystem. J. Obshchey Biol. (J. Gen. Biol.) 44, 406-414 (in Russian with English abstract).
7. Chertov, O.G., 1983b. Quantitative approach to species ecological parameters with special reference to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L., Pinaceae). Bot. J. 68, 1318-1324 (in Russian with English abstract).
8. Chertov, O.G., 1990. SPECOM - a single tree model of pine stand/raw humus soil ecosystem. Ecol. Modell. 50, 107-132.
9. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., 1997. SOMM: a model of soil organic matter dynamics. Ecol. Modell. 94, 177-189.
10. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Karev, G.P., 1999a. Modern Approaches in Forest Ecosystem Modelling. Research Report N8. Leiden Boston Koln. Brill, European Forest Institute, pp. 1-130.
11. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Tsiplianovsky, A.M., 1999b. A combined simulation model of Scots pine, Norway spruce and silver birch ecosystems in the European boreal zone. For. Ecol. Manage. 116, 189-206.
12. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Tsiplianovsky, A.M., 1999c. Simulation of soil organic matter and nitrogen accumulation in Scots pine plantations on bare parent material using forest combined model EFIMOD. Plant Soil 213, 31-41.
13. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., Nadporozhskaya, M.A., Bykhovets, S.S., Zudin, S.L., 2001. ROMUL - model of forest soil organic matter dynamics as a substantial tool for forest ecosystem modelling. Ecol. Modell. 138, 289-318.
14. Friend, A.D., Stevens, A.K., Knox, R.G., Cannell, M.G.R, 1997. A process-based terrestrial biosphere model of ecosystem dynamics (Hybrid v 3.0). Ecol. Modell. 95, 249-287.
15. Karpov, V.G., 1969. Experimental Phytocoenology of Dark Coniferous Taiga. Nauka, Moscow, 350 pp.
16. Kazimirov, N.I., Volkov, A.D., Ziabchenko, S.S., Ivanchikov, A.A., Morozova, R.M., 1977. The Cycle of Elements and Energy in Pine Forests of Russian European North. Nauka, Moscow, 304 pp. (in Russian).
17. Kazimirov, N.I., Morozova, R.M., Kulikova, V.K., 1978. The Biomass and Elements Cycle in Birch Forests of Central Taiga. Nauka, Moscow, 216 pp. (in Russian).
18. Kellomäki, S., Kolström, M., 1994. The influence of climate change on the productivity of Scots pine, Norway spruce, Pendula birch and pubescent birch in southern and northern Finland. For. Ecol. Manage. 65, 201-217.
19. Kellomäki, S., Väisänen, H., Hänninen, H., Kolström, T., Lauhanen, R., Mattila, U., Pajari, B., 1992. SIMA: a model for forest succession based on the carbon and nitrogen cycles with application to silvicultural management of the forest ecosystem. Silva Carelica 22, 85.
20. Kellomäki, S., Väisänen, H., Strandman, H., 1993. FinnFor: a model for calculating the response of the boreal forest ecosystem to climate changes. Research Note No. 6. Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland, 120 pp.
21. Killingbeck, K.T., 1996. Nutrients in senescent leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption proficiency. Ecology 77 (6), 1716-1727.
22. Koivisto, P., 1962. Kasvu-jatuottotaulukoita. Growth and yield tables. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 65 (8), 1-49.
23. Kolström, H., 1999. Ecological simulation model for studying diversity of stand structure in boreal forests. Ecol. Modell. 111, 17-36.
24. Kostin, N.V., 1997. Geographic variability of productivity of Norway spruce stands in European forest zone. PhD Thesis. St. Petersburg Forest Technical Academy (in Russian).
25. Kubin, E., 1983. Nutrients in the soil, ground vegetation and tree layer in an old spruce forest in northern Finland. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 20, 361-390.
26. Liebig, J.V., 1843. Die Chemie in ihrer Aswendung auf Agricultur und Physiologie. 5. Aufl. Braunshweig.
27. Liu, J., Ashton, P.S., 1995. Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management. For. Ecol. Manage. 73, 157-175.
28. Mälkönen, E., 1974. Annual primary production and nutrient cycles in some Scots pine stands. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 84 (5), 1-82.
29. Mälkönen, E., 1977. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in a birch stand. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 91 (5), 1-28.
30. Marklund, L.G., 1988. Biomassafunktioner for tall, gran och bjork i Sverige. Summary: Biomass Functions for Pine, Spruce and Birch in Sweden. Report 45. Department of Forest Survey, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, p. 73 (in Swedish with English summary).
31. Rolff, C., Ågren, G., 1999. Predicting effects of different harvesting intensities with a model of nitrogen limited forest growth. Ecol. Modell. 118, 193-211.
32. Ryan, M.G., Hunt Jr., E.R., McMurtrie, R.E., Agren, G.I., Aber, J.D., Friend, A.D., Rastetter, E.B., Pullia, W.M., Raison, R.J., Linder, S., 1996. In: Breymeyer, A.I., Hall, D.O., Melillo, J.M., Agren, G.I. (Eds.), Comparing Models of Ecosystem Function for Temperate Conifer Forests. L Model Descriptions and Validation. SCOPE 56-Global Change: Effects on Coniferous Forests and Grasslands. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 313-362.
33. Shugart, H.H., 1984. A Theory of Forest Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, 278 pp.
34. Tselniker, J.L., 1978. Physiological Basis of Trees Shade-Tolerance. Nauka, Moscow, 215 pp. (in Russian).
35. Urban, D.L., Bonan, G.B., Smith, T.M., Shugart, H.H., 1991. Spatial applications of gap models. For. Ecol. Manage. 42, 95-110.
36. Vitousek, P., 1982. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. Am. Nat. 119 (4), 553-572.
37. Weishampel, J.F., Urban, D.L., 1996. Coupling a spatially explicit forest gap model with a 3D solar routine to simulate latitudinal effects. Ecol. Modell. 86, 101-111.