A combined simulation model of Scots pine, Norway spruce and Silver birch ecosystems in the European boreal zone

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 116, Issue 1-3, 1999, Pages 189-206

  Chertov, O G ^a,d   Komarov, A S ^b   Tsiplianovsky, A M ^c  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF BASIC BIOLOGICAL PROBLEMS   (Russian Federation)

^c PUSHCHINO STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Boreal zone; Climate change; Forest ecosystem; Simulation; Soil organic matter; Tree

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ECOSYSTEM; MINERALIZATION; NITROGEN METABOLISM; NORWAY SPRUCE; NUTRIENT CYCLING; SCOTS PINE; SILVER BIRCH; SIMULATION MODEL;

BOREAL FOREST; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL;

EUROPE;

BETULA PENDULA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 0033548904     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00456-3     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ågren G.I. Nitrogen productivity of some conifers. Can. J. Forest Res. 13:1983;494-500.
2. Ågren, G., Bosatta, E., 1996. Theoretical Ecosystem Ecology, Understanding Element Cycles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 234 p.
3. Alexeev, V.A., 1975. Light Regime of Forest (in Russian), Leningrad, Nauka, 228 p.
4. Alexeev, V.A. (Ed.), 1990. Forest Ecosystems and Air Pollution (in Russian), Nauka, 232 p.
5. Arp P.A., McGrath T.P. A parameter-based method for modelling biomass accumulation in forest stands: Theory. Ecological Modelling. 36:1987;29-48.
6. Arp P.A., McGrath T.P., Beck J.A. A parameter-based method for modelling biomass accumulation in forest stands: An application. Ecological Modelling. 36:1987;49-64.
7. Bevins C.D., Andrews P.L., Keane R.E. Forest succession modelling using the Loki software. Lesnictvi (For. Sci., Prague). 41:1995;158-162.
8. Bossel H., Krieger H., Schäfer H., Trost N. Simulation of forest stand dynamics, using real-structure process models. Forest Ecology and Management. 42:1991;3-21.
9. Botkin, D.B., 1993. Forest Dynamics. An Ecological Model. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 310 p.
10. Bugmann H.K.M. A simplified forest model to study species composition along climate gradient. Ecology. 77:1996;2055-2074.
11. Chertov, O.G., 1983a. The mathematical model of single plant ecosystem (in Russian with English abstract), J. Obshchey Biol., J. Fundamental Biology, (Moscow) 44, 406-414.
12. Chertov, O.G., 1983b. Quantitative approach for evaluation of ecological parameters of species, Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. Pinaceae as an example (in Russian with English abstract), Bot. J. (Leningrad) 68, 318-1324.
13. Chertov O.G. SPECOM - a single tree model of pine stand/raw humus soil ecosystem. Ecological Modelling. 50:1990;107-132.
14. Chertov, O.G., Komarov, A.S., 1996. Model of soil organic matter and nitrogen dynamics in natural ecosystems. In: Powlson, D.S., Smith P., Smith, J.U. (Eds.), Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models Using Existing Long-Term Datasets, NATO ASI Series, vol.I 38, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 231-236.
15. Chertov O.G., Komarov A.S. SOMM - a model of soil organic matter dynamics. Ecological Modelling. 94(2/3):1997;177-189.
16. Chertov, O.G., Prokhorov, V.M., Kvetnaya, O.M., 1978. On soil processes modelling (in Russian with English abstract). Pochvovedenie (Soviet Soil Sci.), No 11, 138-146.
17. Dale V.H., Doyle T.W., Shugart H.H. A comparison of tree growth models. Ecological Modelling. 29:1985;145-170.
18. DeAngelis, D.L., Gross, L.S. (Eds.), 1991. Individual-based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems, Academic Press, New York, USA.
19. Esser G., Lautenschlager M. Estimating the change of carbon in the terrestrial biosphere from 18 000 BP to present using a carbon cycle model. Environmental Pollution. 83:1994;45-53.
20. Foley J.A. Net primary productivity in the terrestrial biosphere: The application of a global model. J. Geophy. Res. 99(20):1994;773-783.
21. Galitsky, V.V., Komarov, A.S., 1987. Discrete models of plant populations (in Russian), In: Samarsky, A.A. (Ed.), Mathematical Modelling. Non-linear Systems. Nauka, Moscow, 59-103.
22. Hurper, J.L., 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.
23. Huston M., DeAngelis D., Post W. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience. 38(10):1988;682-691.
24. Karev, G.P., 1994. Structural models of forests natural dynamics (in Russian with English abstract), Doklady Biological Sciences 337, 354-356.
25. Karpachevsky, L.O., 1981. Forest and Forest Soils (in Russian), Lesnaya Prom., Moscow, 264 p.
26. Kazimirov, N.I., Morozova, R.M., 1973. Biological Turnover of Substances in Carelian Spruce Stands (in Russian), Nauka, Leningrad. 176 pp.
27. Kazimirov, N.I., Volkov, A.D., Ziabchenko, S.S., Ivanchikov, A.A., Morozova, R.M., 1977. Substances and Energy Exchange in Pine Forests of European North (in Russian), Nauka, Leningrad, 304 pp.
28. Kazimirov, N.I., Morozova, R.M. and Kulikova, V.K., 1978. Organic matter and substances flows in birch forests of the middle taiga (in Russian), Nauka, Leningrad, 216 pp.
29. Kellen, V., Todd, B., Novak, R., Saenz, B., 1996. Delphi 2: A Developer's Guide. M&T Books.
30. Kellomäki S., Väisänen H., Hänninen H., Kolström T., Lauhanen R., Mattila U., Pajari B. SIMA: A model for forest succession based on the carbon and nitrogen cycles with application to silvicultural management of the forest ecosystem. Silva Carelica. 22:1992;3-85.
31. Kellomäki S., Väisänen H., Strandman H. FINFOR: A model for calculating the response of the boreal forest ecosystem to climate change. University of Joensuu. Faculty of Forestry Research Note. 6:1993;3-120.
32. Komarov, A.S., Grabarnik, P.Ya., Galitsky, V.V., 1985. Experimental Data Processing - Statistical Package DIANA (in Russian), PSC RAS, Pushchino, 52 p.
33. Krieger H., Schäfer H., Bossel H. SPRUCOM - A simulation model of spruce stand dynamics under varying emission exposure. Syst. Anal. Model. Simul. 7:1990;117-129.
34. Kubin E. Nutrients in the soil, ground vegetation and tree layer in an old spruce forest in northern Finland. Annales Botanici Fennici. 20:1983;361-390.
35. Levine E.R., Ranson K.J., Smith J.A., Williams D.L., Knox R.G., Shugart H.H., Urban D.L., Lawrence W.T. Forest ecosystem dynamics: Linking forest succession, soil process and radiation models. Ecological Modelling. 65:1993;199-219.
36. Liu J., Ashton P.S. Individual-based simulation models for forest succession and management. Forest Ecology and Management. 73:1995;157-175.
37. Mälkönen E. Annual primary production and nutrient cycles in some Scots pine stands. Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 84(5):1974;1-82.
38. Mälkönen E. Annual primary production and nutrient cycle in a birch stand. Comm. Inst. Forest. Fenn. 91(5):1977;1-28.
39. Maslakov, E.L., Pankeeva, N.V., 1986. Stand forming, differentiation and selection of trees in spruce plantations (in Russian), In Maslakov, E.L., Rubtsov, V.G. (Eds.), Planting Stock for Forest Plantations, Leningrad Forest Res. Inst., Leningrad, pp. 39-48.
40. Maslakov, E.L., Kuznetsov, A.N., Starostin, V.A., 1988. Growth dynamics and stand structure of plantations of different densities after thinning (in Russian). In Maslakov, E.L., Starostin, V.A., Turchinskaya, I.A. (Eds.), Establishing of high productive forest plantations, Leningrad Forest Res. Inst., Leningrad, pp. 39-54.
41. Moshkalev, A.G., Davidov, G.M., Yanovsky, L.N., Moiseev, V.I., Kostrukov, A.I., 1984. Reference Book on Forest Inventory at USSR North-west (in Russian), Lesotekhnicheskaya Akademia, Leningrad, 319 p.
42. Mou P., Mitchell R.J., Jones R.H. Ecological field theory model: A mechanistic approach to simulate plant-plant interactions in south-eastern forest ecosystems. Can. J. For. Res. 23(2):1993;2180-2193.
43. Paal, J.L., Oja, T.A., Kolodyazhnyi, S.F., 1989. Taxon and Time Continuum of Vegetation (in Russian), Tallinn, 187 p.
44. Pastor, J., Post, W.M., 1985. Development of a linked forest productivity-soil process model. Oak Ridge National Laboratory ORNL/TM-9519.
45. Post, W.M., King, A.W., Wullschleger, S.D., 1996. Soil organic matter models and global estimates of soil organic carbon, In: Powlson, D.S., Smith, P., Smith, J. (Eds.), Evaluation of Soil Organic Matter Models NATO ASI Series, vol. I 38, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 201-222.
46. Post, W.M., Pastor, J., 1990. An individual-based forest ecosystem model for projecting forest response to nutrient cycling and climate changes, In: Wensel L.C., Biging, G.S. (Eds.), Forest Simulation Systems, University of California, Div. of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Bull, 1927, pp. 61-74.
47. Prentice I.C., Helmisaari H. Silvics of north European trees: Compilation, comparisons and implications for forest succession modelling. Forest Ecology and Management. 42:1991;79-93.
48. Sennov, S.N., 1984. Ecological Basis of Tending Forests (in Russian) Lesnajo Prom. Publ., Moscow.
49. Smirnova, O.V., Chistiakova, A.A., Popadyuk, R.V., M.V., Mitrofanova, Evstigneev, O.I., Korotkov, B.N., Ponomarenko, E.V., 1990. Population Organization of Vegetation in Forest Regions (in Russian), Acad. Sci. of the USSR, Pushchino, 92 p.
50. Tretiakov, N.V., Gorsky, P.V., Samoilovich, G.G., 1965. Reference Book on Forest Mensuration (in Russian), Lesn. Prom., Moskva, 460 p.
51. Tselniker, J.L., 1978. Physiological Basis of Trees Shade Tolerance (in Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 215 pp.
52. Uranov, A.A., 1965. Phytogenic field. In: Problems of Soviet botany (in Russian), Vol. 1. Proc. 3rd All-Union Botanical Congress, Nauka, Moscow; Leningrad, pp. 251-254.
53. Vitousek P.M. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency. American Naturalist. 119:1982;553-572.
54. Wu H., Sharpe P.J.H., Walker J., Penrige L.K. Ecological field theory: A spatial analysis of resource interference among plants. Ecological Modelling. 29:1985;215-243.