Constant drawdown aquifer tests: An alternative to traditional constant rate tests

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 76-78

  Rice Jr , John B ^a  

^a ENSAT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031806091     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1998.tb00617.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (7)

1. Bennett, G.D., and E.P. Patten Jr. 1962. Constant-head pumping test of a multiaquifer well to determine characteristics of individual aquifers. U.S. Geological Survey water-supply paper 1536-G, 181-203.
2. Hantush, M.S. 1964. Hydraulics of wells. In Advances in hydroscience, ed. V.T. Chow, vol. 1, 281-432. New York: Academic Press.
3. Jacob, C.E., and S.W. Lohman. 1952. Nonsteady flow to a well of constant drawdown in an extensive aquifer. Trans. AGU 33, no. 4: 559-569.
4. Jones, L., T. Lemar, and C-T. Tsai. 1992. Results of two pumping tests in Wis consin age weathered till in Iowa. Ground Water 30, no. 4: 529-538.
5. Jones, L. 1993. A comparison of pumping and slug tests for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of unweathered Wisconsian age till in Iowa. Ground Water 31, no. 6: 896-904.
6. Kruseman, G.P., and N.A. deRidder. 1991. Analysis and evaluation of pumping test data. Publication 47, 2nd ed. Wageningen, The Netherlands: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement.
7. Mishra, S., and D. Guyonnet. 1992. Analysis of observation-well response during constant-head testing. Ground Water 30, no. 4: 523-528.