A predictive model with repeated measures analysis of Staphylococcus aureus growth data

Food Microbiology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 139-147

  McCann, T L ^a,c   Eifert, J D ^a,b   Gennings, C ^a   Schilling, M W ^a,b   Carter Jr , W H ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth; Predictive model; Repeated measures; Staphylococcus aureus

Indexed keywords

STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 0037393903     PISSN: 07400020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0740-0020(02)00141-7     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bratchell, N., Gibson, A.M., Truman, M., Kelly, T.M., Roberts, T.A., 1989. Predicting microbial growth: the consequences of quantity of data. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 8, 47-58.
2. Buchanan, R.L., Smith, J.L., McColgan, C., Marmer, B.S., Golden, M., Dell, B., 1993. Response surface models for the effects of temperature, pH, sodium chloride and sodium nitrite on the aerobic and anaerobic growth of Staphylococcus aureus 196E. J. Food Safety 13, 159-175.
3. Eifert, J.D., Gennings, C., Carter, W.H., Duncan, S.E., Hackney, C.R., 1996. Predictive model with improved statistical analysis of interactive factors affecting the growth of Staphylococcus aureus 196E. J. Food Protect. 59 (6), 608-614.
4. Eifert, J.D., Hackney, C.R., Pierson, M.D., Duncan, S.E., Eigel, W.N., 1997. Acetic, lactic and hydrochloric acid effects on Staphylococcus aureus 196E growth based on a predictive model. J. Food Sci. 62 (1), 174-178.
5. Garthright, W.E., 1991. Refinements in the prediction of microbial growth curves. Food Microbiol. 8, 239-248.
6. Gibson, A.M., Bratchell, N., Roberts, T.A., 1988. Predicting microbial growth: growth responses of salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by pH, sodium chloride and storage temperature. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 6, 155-178.
7. Gompertz, B., 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London 115, 513-585.
8. Hinkelmann, K., Kempthorne, O., 1994. Split-Plot Designs. In: Design and Analysis of Experiments, Vol. 1. Wiley, New York, pp. 439-441.
9. Huynh, H., Feldt, L.S., 1970. Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurements designs have exact F-distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65 (332), 1582-1589.
10. Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., Wolfinger, R.D., 1996. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 633pp.
11. McCann, T.L., 1999. Determining estimable functions in the general model. Dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
12. SAS Instiute, Inc., 1997. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
13. Vonesh, E.F., Chinchilli, V.M., 1997. Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
14. Whiting, R.C., Buchanan, R.L., 1997. Predictive Modeling. In: Doyle, M.P., Beuchat, L.R., Montville, T.J. (Eds.), Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and Frontiers. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp. 728-739 (Chapter 40).