Intermodal blocking in honeybees

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 369-381

  Couvillon, P A ^a   Campos, A C ^a   Bass, T D ^a   Bitterman, M E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEE; COLOR VISION; ODOR; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION;

ANIMAL; BEES; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLOR PERCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SMELL; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.; SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.;

EID: 0035516082     PISSN: 02724995     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724990143000117     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bitterman, M.E., & Couvillon, P.A. (1991). Failures to find evidence of adaptive specialization in the learning of honeybees. In J.L. Goodman & R.C. Fischer (Eds.), The behaviour and physiology of bees (pp. 288-395). Wallingford: CAB International.
2. Couvillon, P.A., Arakaki, L., & Bitterman, M.E. (1997). Intramodal blocking in honeybees. Animal Learning & Behavior 25, 271-282.
3. Couvillon, P.A., & Bitterman, M.E. (1980). Some phenomena of associative learning in honeybees. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 94, 875-885.
4. Couvillon, P.A., & Bitterman, M.E. (1982). Compound conditioning in honeybees. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 96, 192-199.
5. Couvillon, P.A., & Bitterman, M.E. (1991). How honeybees make choices. In J.L. Goodman & R.C. Fischer (Eds.), The behaviour and physiology of bees (pp. 116-130). Wallingford: CAB International.
6. Couvillon, P.A., Leiato, T.G., & Bitterman, M.E. (1991). Learning by honeybees (Apis mellifera) on arrival and departure from a feeding place. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 105, 177-184.
7. Couvillon, P.A., Mateo, E.T., & Bitterman, M.E. (1996). Reward and learning in honeybees: Analysis of an overshadowing effect. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 19-27.
8. Feldman, J.M. (1975). Blocking as a function of added cue intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 3, 98-192.
9. Funayama, E.S., Couvillon, P.A., & Bitterman, M.E. (1995). Compound conditioning in honeybees: Blocking tests of the independence assumption. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 429-437.
10. Gerber, B., & Smith, B.H. (1998). Visual modulation of olfactory learning in honeybees. Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, 2213-2217.
11. Gerber, B., & Ulrich, J. (1999). No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202, 1839-1854.
12. Hall, G., Mackintosh, N.J., Goodall. G., & dal Martello, M. (1977). Loss of control by a less valid or by a less salient stimulus compounded with a better predictor of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 8, 145-158.
13. Hosler, J.S., & Smith, B.H. (2000). Blocking and the detection of odor components in blends. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203, 2797-2806.
14. Hull, C.L. (1929). A functional interpretation of the conditioned reflex. Psychological Review, 36, 498-511.
15. Kamin, L.J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B.A. Campbell & R.M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Kehoe, E.J., Horne, A.L., Horne, P.S., & Macrae, M. (1994). Summation and configuration between and within sensory modalities in classical conditioning of the rabbit. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 19-26
17. Lehrer, M. (1991). Bees which turn back and look. Naturwissenschaften, 78, 274-276.
18. Mackintosh, N.J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
19. Mackintosh, N.J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186-192
20. Miller, R.R., Barnet, R.C., & Grahame, N.J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 363-386.
21. Miller, R.R., & Matute, H. (1996). Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 370-386.
22. Pearce, J.M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
23. Pearce, J.M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 82, 532-552.
24. Pearce, J.M., & Wilson, P.N. (1990). Configural associations in discrimination learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 250-261.
25. Pelz, C., Gerber, B., & Menzel, R. (1997). Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: Roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200, 837-847.
26. Rescorla, R.A. (2000). Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 428-438.
27. Rescorla, R.A., & Coldwell, S.E. (1995). Summation in autoshaping. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 314-326.
28. Rescorla, R.A., & Wagner, A.R. (1972). A theory of classical conditioning: Variation in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.), Conditioning II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
29. Shapiro, M.S., & Bitterman, M.E. (1998). Intramodal competition for attention in honeybees. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 334-338.
30. Smith, B.H., & Cobey, S. (1994). The olfactory memory of the honeybee Apis mellifera. II. Blocking between odorants in binary mixtures. Journal of Experimental Biology, 195, 91-108.
31. Spence, K.W. (1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychological Review, 43, 427-449.
32. Sutherland, N.S., & Mackintosh, N.J. (1971). Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press.
33. Wagner, A.R. (1969). Stimulus validity and stimulus selection in associative learning. In N.J. Mackintosh & W.K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 90-122). Halifax: Dalhousie University Press.
34. Walker, M.M., & Bitterman, M.E. (1989). Honeybees can be trained to respond to very small changes in magnetic field intensity. Journal of Experimental Biology, 145, 489-494.