Does analogical transfer involve a term-to-term alignment?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 221-230

  Ripoll, Thierry ^a   Brude, Tristan ^a   Coulon, David ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; INTELLECT; LEARNING; MODEL; PROBLEM SOLVING; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037367754     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194381     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. BARSALOU, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.
2. BARSALOU, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.
3. BASSOK, M., & MEDIN, D. L. (1997). Birds of a feather flock together: Similarity judgments with semantically rich stimuli. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 311-336.
4. BASSOK, M., WU, L. L., & OLSETH, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory & Cognition, 23, 354-367.
5. BOWDLE, B. F., & GENTNER, D. (1997). Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 244-286.
6. BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350.
7. CATRAMBONE, R., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.
8. CAUZINILLE-MARMÉCHE, E., & DIDIERJEAN, A. (1999). Raisonnement par analogie et généralisation de connaissances [Reasoning by analogy and knowledge generalization]. In G. Netchine-Grynberg (Ed.), Développement et fonctionnement cognitif: Vers une intégration (pp. 125-152). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
9. COLLINS, A. M., BROWN, J. S., & LARKIN, K. M. (1980). Inferences in text understanding. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 385-407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. ESKRIDGE, T. C. (1994). A hybrid model of continuous analogical reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory: Vol. 2, Analogical connections (pp. 207-246). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. FALKENHAINER, B., FORBUS, K. D., & GENTNER, D. (1989). The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence, 41, 1-63.
12. GENTNER, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 199-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. GENTNER, D., & TOUPIN, C. (1986). Systematicity and surface similarity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
14. GICK, M. L., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1993). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
15. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994a). Influence of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
16. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994b). Similarity, interactive activation and mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 3-28.
17. GOLDSTONE, R. L., LIPPA, Y., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78, 27-43.
18. GRAESSER, A. C., SINGER, M., & TRABASSO, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 3, 371-395.
19. HOLYOAK, K. J. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 199-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. HOLYOAK, K. J., & BARNDEN, J. A. (1994). Introduction. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory (Vol. 1, pp. 1-27). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21. HOLYOAK, K. J., NOVICK, L. R., & MELZ, E. R. (1994). Component processes in transfer. In K. J. Holyoak & J, A. Barnden (Eds.), Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory (Vol. 1, pp. 113-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. HOLYOAK, K. J., & THAGARD, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
23. HUMMEL, J. E., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 2, 427-466.
24. KEANE, M. T., LEDGEWAY, T., & STUART, D. (1994). Constraints on analogical mapping: A comparison of three models. Cognitive Science, 18, 387-438.
25. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
26. KINTSCH, W. (1992). How readers construct situation models for stories: The role of syntactic cues and causal inferences. In A. E Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 261-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. LOVE, C. L., ROUDER, J. N., & WISNIEWSKI, E. J. (1999). A structural account of global and local processing. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 291-316.
28. MARKMAN, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference. Cognitive Science, 21, 373-418.
29. MARKMAN, A. B., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
30. MCKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
31. MEDIN, D. L., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & GENTNER, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
32. MEDIN, D. L., & ROSS, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. METCALFE, J., & WIEBE, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246.
34. MURPHY, G. L., & ROSS, B. H. (1994). Prediction from uncertain categorizations. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 148-193.
35. NOVICK, L. R., & HOLYOAK, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 398-415.
36. REEVES, L. M., & WEISBERG, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 381-400.
37. RIPOLL, T. (1998). Why this makes me think of that. Thinking & Reasoning, 4, 15-43.
38. RIPOLL, T., BOURRELLY, L., ANTONI, F., & PÉLISSIER, A. (2000). The role of pragmatic constraints in the processing of analogous cross-mapping situations. Current Psychology Letters, 1, 25-37.
39. RIPOLL, T., & COULON, D. (2001). Le raisonnement par analogie: Une analyse descriptive et critique des modeles du mapping [Reasoning by analogy: A descriptive and critical analysis of current models of mapping]. L'Anné Psychologique, 101, 289-323.
40. ROSS, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 629-639.
41. ROSS, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 456-468.
42. ROSS, B. H. (1996). Category representations and the effects of interacting with instances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1249-1265.
43. ROSS, B. H., & BRADSHAW, G. L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings. Memory & Cognition, 22, 591-605.
44. ROSS, B. H., & KILBANE, M. C. (1997). Effects of principle explanation and superficial similarity on analogical mapping in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 427-440.
45. SANDER, E. (2000). L'analogie, du naïf au créatif: Analogie et catégorisation [Analogy; from the naive to the creative: Analogy and categorization]. Paris: L'Harmattan.
46. SCHUNN, C. D., & DUNBAR, K. (1996). Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 24, 271-284.
47. SCHYNS, P. G., GOLDSTONE, R. L., & THIBAUT, J. (1998). Development of features in object concepts. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
48. SCHYNS, P. G., & RODET, L. (1997). Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 681-696.
49. SEIFERT, C. M., ABELSON, R. P., MCKOON, G., & RATCLIFF, R. (1986). Memory connections between thematically similar episodes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 220-231.
50. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & BASSOK, M. (1999). What makes a man similar to a tie? Stimulus compatibility with comparison and integration. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 208-238.
51. WISNIEWSKI, E. J., & MEDIN, D. (1994). On the interaction of theory and data in concept learning. Cognitive Science, 18, 221-282.
52. ZAMANI, M., & RICHARD, J.-F. (2000). Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 28, 873-886.