Deliberate choices of restrictions in complete randomization

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 87-99

  Arvidsson, Martin ^a   Gremyr, Ida ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Complete randomization; Design of experiments; Randomization restrictions; Resetting restrictions; Split plot

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; INJECTION MOLDING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

RANDOMIZATION;

RELIABILITY THEORY;

EID: 0037360779     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.511     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Fisher RA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh, U.K., 1925.
2. Fisher RA. The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd: London, 1935.
3. Cochran WG, Cox GM. Experimental Design. Wiley: New York, 1957.
4. Daniel C. Application of Statistics to Industrial Experimentation. Wiley: New York, 1976.
5. Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS. Statistics for Experimenters - An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. Wiley: New York, 1978.
6. Youden WJ. Randomization and experimentation. Technometrics 1972; 14:13-22.
7. Ganju J, Lucas JM. Bias in test statistics when restrictions in randomization are caused by factors. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 1997; 26:47-63.
8. Hahn GJ, Hill WJ, Hoerl RW, Zinkgraf SA. The impact of six sigma improvement - a glimpse into the future of statistics. The American Statistician 1999; 53:208-215.
9. Nelson LS. Notes on the use of randomization in experimentation. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:123-125.
10. Box GEP. Statistics as a catalyst to learning by scientific method part II - a discussion. Journal of Quality Technology 1999; 31:16-29.
11. Coleman DE, Montgomery DC. A systematic approach to planning for a designed industrial experiment. Technometrics 1993; 35:1-12.
12. Box G, Jones S. Split-plot designs for robust product experimentation. Journal of Applied Statistics 1992; 19:3-25.
13. Shewhart WA. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. Van Nostrand: New York, 1931.
14. Shewhart WA. Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Dover: New York, 1939.
15. Young CJ. Blocking, replication, and randomization - the key to effective experimentation: A case study. Quality Engineering 1996; 9:269-277.
16. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1995.
17. Bisgaard S, Fuller HT, Barrios E. Quality quandaries-two-level factorials run as split plot experiments. Quality Engineering 1996; 5:705-708.
18. Letsinger JD, Myers RH, Lentner M. Response surface methods for bi-randomization structures. Journal of Quality Technology 1996; 28:381-397.
19. q-r split plot experiments. Journal of Quality Technology 2000; 32:39-56.
20. Shoemaker AC, Tsui KL, Wu J. Economical experimentation methods for robust design. Technometrics 1991; 33:415-427.
21. Michaels SE. The usefulness of experimental design (with discussion). Applied Statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 1964; 13:221-235.
22. Kackar RN. Off-line quality control, parameter design, and the Taguchi method. Journal of Quality Technology 1985; 17:176-188.
23. Phadke MS. Quality Engineering using Robust Design. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989.
24. Daniel C. Use of half-normal plots in interpreting factorial. Technometrics 1959; 1:311-341.
25. k-p fractional factorial designs, Part I. Technometrics 1961; 3:311-351.
26. k-p fractional factorial designs, Part II. Technometrics 1961; 3:449-458.
27. Ganju J, Lucas JM. Detecting randomization restrictions caused by factors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1999; 81:129-140.
28. Arvidsson M, Kammerlind P, Hynén A, Bergman B. Identification of factors influencing dispersion in split-plot experiments. Journal of Applied Statistics 2001; 28:269-283.