Exercise echocardiographic comparison of pulmonary autograft and aortic homograft replacements for aortic valve disease in adults

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 202-208

  Wang, Andrew ^a   Jaggers, James ^a   Ungerleider, Ross M ^a   Lim, Chang S ^a   Ryan, Thomas ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALLOGRAFT; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BICYCLE ERGOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART RATE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL ENDURANCE; PREVALENCE; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULMONARY VALVE; REST; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE VOLUME; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS;

EID: 0037354661     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ross D. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967;2:956-958
2. Chambers JC, Somerville J, Stone S, Ross DN. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease: Long-term results of the pioneer series. Circulation 1997;96:2206-2214
3. Ross D. The pulmonary autograft: history and basic techniques. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;8:350-357
4. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 1989;64:651-654
5. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: Comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-458
6. Dumesnil JG, Shoucri RM. Effect of the geometry of the left ventricle on the calculation of ejection fraction. Circulation 1982;65:91-98
7. Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1985;72:810-818
8. Rassi A, Jr., Crawford MH, Richards KL, Miller JF. Differing mechanisms of exercise flow augmentation at the mitral and aortic valves. Circulation 1988;77:543-551
9. Hatle L. Doppler ultrasound in cardiology: Physical principles and clinical applications. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, 1984
10. Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:952-959
11. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol 1996;12:379-387
12. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Metras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:211-218
13. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Jobin J, Cartier P, Honos G, Durand LG. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1609-617
14. Porter GF, Skillington PD, Bjorksten AR, Morgan JG, Yapanis AG, Grigg LE. Exercise hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autograft following the Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:516-521
15. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Briand M, Laforest I, Cartier P. Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the Ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprostheses. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:982-988
16. Phillips JR, Daniels CJ, Orsinelli DA, et al. Valvular hemodynamics and arrhythmias with exercise following the Ross procedure. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:577-583
17. Eriksson MJ, Kallner G, Rosfors S, Ivert T, Brodin LA. Hemodynamic performance of cryopreserved aortic homograft valves during midterm follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32:1002-1008
18. Kouchoukos NT, Davila-Roman VG, Spray TL, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic-valve disease (see comments). N Engl J Med 1994;330:1-6
19. Savoye C, Auffray JL, Hubert E, et al. Echocardiographic follow-up after Ross procedure in 100 patients. Am J Cardiol 2000;85:854-857
20. Hawkins JA, Breinholt JP, Lambert LM, et al. Class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies after implantation of cryopreserved allograft material in pediatric patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;119:324-330
21. Raanani E, Yau TM, David TE, Dellgren G, Sonnenberg BD, Omran A.. Risk factors for late pulmonary homograft stenosis after the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1953-1957
22. Forbess JM, Shah AS, St Louis JD, Jaggers JJ, Ungerleider RM. Cryopreserved homografts in the pulmonary position: Determinants of durability. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:54-59; discussion 59-60
23. Notzold A, Huppe M, Schmidtke C, Blomer P, Uhlig T, Sievers HH. Quality of life in aortic valve replacement: Pulmonary autografts versus mechanical prostheses. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1963-1966