What impact will the 'conversion' of two district general hospitals into teaching hospitals have? Views from the field

Medical Education

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 223-232

  Mathers, Jonathan ^a   Parry, Jayne ^a   Lewis, Sarah ^b   Greenfield, Sheila ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERAL HOSPITAL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; REVIEW; TEACHING; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; ENGLAND; HEALTH FACILITY PLANNING; HOSPITALS, DISTRICT; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 0037348042     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01434.x     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. The NHS Plan. A plan for investment. A Plan for Reform. London: HMSO; 2000.
2. Aggressive Research Intelligence Facility (ARIF). What are the effects of teaching hospital status on patient outcomes? April 1998: http://www.bham.ac.uk/arif/teach.htm.
3. Mathers J, Parry J. The association between patient outcomes and teaching hospital status. (in Press)
4. Johnson B, Boohan M. Basic clinical skills: don't leave teaching to the teaching hospitals. Med Educ 2000;34:692-9.
5. University of Birmingham Black Country Strategy. A proposal to increase the medical student numbers at the University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 1999.
6. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483-8.
7. Miller WL, Crabtree BF. Clinical research: a multi-method typology and qualitative road-map. In: Crabtree, BF, Miller, WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.
8. Kvale S. Interviews: an Introduction to Qualitative Research Writing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.
9. Hyde C, Parkes J, Deeks J, Milne R. Systematic review of effectiveness of teaching critical appraisal. UK National R & D Programme. Project 12-8: August 2000.
10. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The relationship between hospital Volume and quality of health outcomes. Report 8; Part 1: 1997.
11. Lynoe N, Sandlund M, Westherg K, Duchek M. Informed consent in clinical training - patient experiences and motives for participating. Med Educ 1998;32:465-71.
12. Lehmann LS, Brancati FL, Chen M-C, Rotter D, Dobs AS. The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care. N Eng J Med 1997;336:1150-5.
13. Social Exclusion Unit. The Cabinet Office. National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: a framework for consultation. London: HMSO; 2000.
14. Hampshire AJ. Providing early clinical experience in primary care. Med Educ 1998;32:495-01.
15. Murray E, Modell M. Community-based teaching: the challenges. Br J General Prac 1999;49:395-8.
16. O'Sullivan M, Martin J, Murray E. Students' perceptions of the relative advantages and disadvantages of community-based and hospital-based teaching: a qualitative study. Med Educ 2000;34:648-55.
17. Gray J, Fine B. General practitioner teaching in the community: a study of their teaching experience and interest in undergraduate teaching in the future. Br J General Prac 1997;47:623-6.
18. Jones S, Oswald N, Date J, Hinds D. Attitudes of patients to medical student participation: general practice consultations on the Cambridge Community-based Clinical Course. Med Educ 1996;30:14-7.
19. Wilson A, Fraser R, McKinley RK, Preston-Whyte Wynn A. Undergraduate teaching in the community, can general practice deliver? Br J General Prac 1996;46:457-60.
20. Parry JM, Greenfield S. Community-based teaching; killing the goose that laid the golden egg? Med Educ 2001;35:722-3.
21. Handy C. Understanding Organizations. London: Penguin Books; 1993.
22. Kanter RM. When giants learn to dance. Simon & Schuster; 1989.
23. Deming WE. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
24. Murray E. Challenges in educational research. Med Educ 2002;36:110-2.