Structural evidence for common functions and ancestry of the reovirus and adenovirus attachment proteins

Reviews in Medical Virology

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 123-132

  Stehle, Thilo ^a   Dermody, Terence S ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; VIRUS PROTEIN; VIRUS RECEPTOR;

ADENOVIRUS; COXSACKIE VIRUS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REOVIRUS; REVIEW; VIRUS ADSORPTION; VIRUS CAPSID; VIRUS CELL INTERACTION;

ADENOVIRIDAE; ANIMALS; CAPSID PROTEINS; CELL ADHESION MOLECULES; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; RECEPTORS, VIRUS; REOVIRIDAE; VIRAL NONSTRUCTURAL PROTEINS;

EID: 0037341386     PISSN: 10529276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.379     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Weissenhorn W, Dessen A, Calder LJ, Harrison SC, Skehel JJ, Wiley DC. Structural basis for membrane fusion by enveloped viruses. Mol Membr Biol 1999; 16: 3-9.
2. Chappell JD, Prota AE, Dermody TS, Stehle T. Crystal structure of reovirus attachment protein sigma 1 reveals evolutionary relationship to adenovirus fiber. EMBO J 2002; 21: 1-11.
3. van Raaij MJ, Mitraki A, Lavigne G, Cusack S. A triple β-spiral in the adenovirus fibre shaft reveals a new structural motif for a fibrous protein. Nature 1999; 401: 935-938.
4. Nibert ML, Schiff LA. Reoviruses and their replication. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds). Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 2001; 1679-1728.
5. Liemann S, Chandran K, Baker TS, Nibert ML, Harrison SC. Structure of the reovirus membrane-penetration protein, Mu1, in a complex with is protector protein, Sigma 3. Cell 2002; 108: 283-295.
6. Furlong DB, Nibert ML, Fields BN. Sigma 1 protein of mammalian reoviruses extends from the surfaces of viral particles. J Virol 1988; 62: 246-256.
7. Fraser RD, Furlong DB, Trus BL, Nibert ML, Fields BN, Steven AC. Molecular structure of the cell-attachment protein of reovirus: correlation of computer-processed electron micrographs with sequence-based predictions. J Virol 1990; 64: 2990-3000.
8. Chappell JD, Duong JL, Wright BW, Dermody TS. Identification of carbohydrate-binding domains in the attachment proteins of type 1 and type 3 reoviruses. J Virol 2000; 74: 8472-8479.
9. Barton ES, Forrest JC, Connolly JL, et al. Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus. Cell 2001; 104: 441-451.
10. Dryden KA, Wang G, Yeager M, et al. Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J Cell Biol 1993; 122: 1023-1041.
11. Reinisch KM, Nibert ML, Harrison SC. Structure of the reovirus core at 3.6 Å resolution. Nature 2000; 404: 960-967.
12. Olland AM, Jane-Valbuena J, Schiff LA, Nibert ML, Harrison SC. Structure of the reovirus outer capsid and dsRNA-binding protein sigma 3 at 1.8 Å resolution. EMBO J 2001; 20: 979-989.
13. Barton ES, Connolly JL, Forrest JC, Chappell JD, Dermody TS. Utilization of sialic acid as a coreceptor enhances reovirus attachment by multistep adhesion strengthening. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 2200-2211.
14. Gentsch JR, Pacitti AF. Effect of neuraminidase treatment of cells and effect of soluble glycoproteins on type 3 reovirus attachment to murine L cells. J Virol 1985; 56: 356-364.
15. Paul RW, Choi AH, Lee PW. The alpha-anomeric form of sialic acid is the minimal receptor determinant recognized by reovirus. Virology 1989; 172: 382-385.
16. Dermody TS, Nibert ML, Bassel-Duby R, Fields BN. A sigma 1 region important for hemagglutination by serotype 3 reovirus strains. J Virol 1990; 64: 5173-5176.
17. Chappell JD, Gunn VL, Wetzel JD, Baer GS, Dermody TS. Mutations in type 3 reovirus that determine binding to sialic acid are contained in the fibrous tail domain of viral attachment protein sigma 1. J Virol 1997; 71: 1834-1841.
18. Weiner HL, Drayna D, Averill DR, Jr, Fields BN. Molecular basis of reovirus virulence: role of the S1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1977; 74: 5744-5748.
19. Weiner HL, Powers ML, Fields BN. Absolute linkage of virulence and central nervous system cell tropism of reoviruses to viral hemagglutinin. J Infect Dis 1980; 141: 609-616.
20. Tyler KL, Squier MK, Rodgers SE, et al. Differences in the capacity of reovirus strains to induce apoptosis are determined by the viral attachment protein sigma 1. J Virol 1995; 69: 6972-6979.
21. Rodgers SE, Barton ES, Oberhaus SM, et al. Reovirus-induced apoptosis of MDCK cells is not linked to viral yield and is blocked by Bcl-2. J Virol 1997; 71: 2540-2546.
22. Connolly JL, Rodgers SE, Clarke P, et al. Reovirus-induced apoptosis requires activation of transcription factor NF-kappaB. J Virol 2000; 74: 2981-2989.
23. Horvitz MS. Adenoviruses. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds). Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 2001; 2301-2326.
24. Shenk TE. Adenoviridae. In Fields Virology, 4th edn, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds). Lippincott-Raven: Philadelphia, 2001; 2265-2300.
25. Bergelson JM, Cunningham JA, Droguett G, et al. Isolation of a common receptor for Coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5. Science 1997; 275: 1320-1323.
26. Carson SD. Receptor for the group B coxsackie-viruses and adenoviruses: CAR. Rev Med Virol 2001; 11: 219-226.
27. Louis N, Fender P, Barge A, Kitts P, Chroboczek J. Cell-binding domain of adenovirus serotype 2 fiber. J Virol 1994; 68: 4104-4106.
28. Henry LJ, Xia D, Wilke ME, Deisenhofer J, Gerard RD. Characterization of the knob domain of the adenovirus type 5 fibre protein expressed in Escherichia coli. J Virol 1994; 68: 5239-5246.
29. Freimuth P, Springer K, Berard C, Hainfeld J, Bewley M, Flanagan J. Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor amino-terminal immunoglobulin V-related domain binds adenovirus type 2 and fibre knob from adenovirus type 12. J Virol 1999; 73: 1392-1398.
30. van Raaij MJ, Louis N, Chroboczek J, Cusack S. Structure of the human adenovirus serotype 2 fiber head domain at 1.5 Å resolution. Virology 1999; 262: 333-343.
31. Xia D, Henry LJ, Gerard RD, Deisenhofer J. Crystal structure of the receptor-binding domain of adenovirus type 5 fibre protein at 1.7 A resolution. Structure 1994; 2: 1259-1270.
32. Durmort C, Stehlin C, Schoehn G, et al. Structure of the fiber head of Ad3, a non-CAR-binding serotype of adenovirus. Virology 2001; 285: 302-312.
33. Bewley MC, Springer K, Zhang YB, Freimuth P, Flanagan JM. Structural analysis of the mechanism of adenovirus binding to its human cellular receptor, CAR. Science 1999; 286: 1579-1583.
34. Burkhard P, Stetefeld J, Strelkov SV. Coiled coils: a highly versatile protein folding motif. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11: 82-88.
35. van Raaij MJ, Schoehn G, Burda MR, Miller S. Crystal structure of a heat and protease-stable part of the bacteriophage T4 short tail fibre. J Mol Biol 2001; 314: 1137-1146.
36. Kanamaru S, Leiman PG, Kostyuchenko VA, et al. Structure of the cell-puncturing device of bacteriophage T4. Nature 2002; 415: 553-557.
37. Bork P, Holm L, Sander C. The immunoglobulin fold. Structural classification, sequence patterns and common core. J Mol Biol 1994; 242: 309-320.
38. Pautsch A, Schulz GE. Structure of the outer membrane protein A transmembrane domain. Nat Struct Biol 1998; 5: 1013-1017.
39. Harrison SC. The familiar and the unexpected in structures of icosahedral viruses. Curr Op Struct Biol 2001; 11: 195-199.
40. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993; 233: 123-138.
41. Ruigrok RW, Barge A, Albiges-Rizo C, Dayan S. Structure of adenovirus fibre. II. Morphology of single fibres. J Mol Biol 1990; 215: 589-596.
42. Ruigrok RW, Barge A, Mittal SK, Jacrot B. The fibre of bovine adenovirus type 3 is very long but bent. J Gen Virol 1994; 75: 2069-2073.
43. Chiu CY, Wu E, Brown SL, Von Seggern DJ, Nemerow GR, Stewart PL. Structural analysis of a fiber-pseudotyped adenovirus with ocular tropism suggests differential modes of cell receptor interactions. J Virol 2001; 75: 5375-5380.
44. Fan E, Merritt EA, Verlinde CL, Hol WG. AB(5) toxins: structures and inhibitor design. Curr Op Struct Biol 2000; 10: 680-686.
45. Abrahams JP, Leslie AG, Lutter R, Walker JE. Structure at 2.8 A resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature 1994; 370: 621-628.
46. Chen XC, Stehle T, Harrison SC. Interaction of polyomavirus internal protein VP2 with the major capsid protein VP1 and implications for participation of VP2 in viral entry. EMBO J 1998; 12: 3233-3240.
47. Capaldi RA, Aggeler R. Mechanism of the F1F0-type ATP synthase, a biological rotary motor. Trends Biochem Sci 2002; 27: 154-160.
48. van Raaij MJ, Chouin E, van der Zandt H, Bergelson JM, Cusack S. Dimeric structure of the coxsackie-virus and adenovirus receptor D1 domain at 1.7 A resolution. Structure 2000; 8: 1147-1155.
49. Kostrewa D, Brockhaus M, D'Arcy A, et al. X-ray structure of junctional adhesion molecule: structural basis for homophilic adhesion via a novel dimerization motif. EMBO J 2001; 20: 4391-4398.
50. Ostrov DA, Shi W, Schwartz JC, Almo SC, Nathenson SG. Structure of murine CTLA-4 and its role in modulating T cell responsiveness. Science 2000; 290: 816-819.
51. Kasper C, Rasmussen H, Kastrup JS, et al. Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by NCAM. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7: 389-393.
52. Casasnovas JM, Stehle T, Liu J, Wang J, Springer T. A dimeric crystal structure for the N-terminal two domains of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998; 95: 4134-4139.
53. Wu H, Kwong PD, Hendrickson WA. Dimeric association and segmental variability in the structure of human CD4. Nature 1997; 387: 527-530.
54. Tan K, Zelus BD, Meijers R, et al. Crystal structure of murine sCEACAM1a[1,4]: a coronavirus receptor in the CEA family. EMBO J 2002; 21: 2076-2086.
55. Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, Sweet RW, Sodroski J, Hendrickson WA. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing antibody. Nature 1998; 393: 648-659.
56. Bella J, Kolatkar PR, Marlor CW, Greve JM, Rossmann MG. The structure of the two amino-terminal domains of human ICAM-1 suggests how it functions as a rhinovirus receptor and as an LFA-1 integrin ligand. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998; 95: 4140-4145.
57. Xiao C, Bator CM, Bowman VD, et al. Interaction of coxsackievirus A21 with its cellular receptor, ICAM-1. J Virol 2001; 75: 2444-2451.
58. Lescar J, Roussel A, Wien MW, et al. The fusion glycoprotein shell of Semliki Forest virus: an icosahedral assembly primed for fusogenic activation at endosomal pH. Cell 2001; 105: 137-148.
59. Pletnev SV, Zhang W, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Locations of carbohydrate sites on alphavirus glycoproteins show that E1 forms an icosahedral scaffold. Cell 2001; 105: 127-136.
60. Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC. The envelope glycoprotein from tick-borne encephalitis virus at 2 A resolution. Nature 1995; 375: 291-298.
61. Benson SD, Bamford JK, Bamford DH, Burnett RM. Viral evolution revealed by bacteriophage PRD1 and human adenovirus coat protein structures. Cell 1999; 98: 825-833.
62. Casasnovas JM, Larvie M, Stehle T. Crystal structure of two CD46 domains reveals an extended measles virus-binding surface. EMBO J 1999; 18: 2911-2922.
63. Prota AE, Sage DR, Stehle T, Fingeroth JD. The crystal structure of human CD21: implications for Epstein-Barr virus and C3d binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002; 99: 10641-10646.
64. Martin-Padura I, Lostaglio S, Schneemann M, et al. Junctional adhesion molecule, a novel member of the immunoglobulin superfamily that distributes at intercellular junctions and modulates monocyte transmigration. J Cell Biol 1998; 142: 117-127.
65. Cohen CJ, Shieh JT, Pickles RJ, Okegawa T, Hsieh JT, Bergelson JM. The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor is a transmembrane component of the tight junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2001; 98: 15191-15196.
66. Carson M. Ribbon models of macromolecules. J Mol Graph 1987; 5: 103-106.