Orthographic influences on agreement: A case for modality-specific form effects on grammatical encoding

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 61-79

  Franck, Julie ^a,b   Bowers, Jeffrey S ^c   Frauenfelder, Uli H ^b   Vigliocco, Gabriella ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FRANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPEECH; WORD RECOGNITION; WRITING;

EID: 0037325783     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960143000452     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Bock, J.K. (1995). Sentence production: From mind to mouth, in J. Miller & P. Eimas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition (Vol. 11): Speech, language, and communication (pp. 181-216). New York: Academic Press.
2. Bock, J.K., & Eberhard, K.M. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57-99.
3. Bock, J.K.,, & Levelt, W.J.M. (1994). Language production. Grammatical encoding. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Bock, J.K., & Miller, C.A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 35-43.
5. Bowers, J.S., & Michita, Y. (1998). An investigation into the structure and acquisition of orthographic knowledge: Evidence from cross-script Kanji-Hiragana priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 259-264.
6. Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551-566.
7. Dell, G.S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
8. Dubois, J. (1965). Grammaire structurale du français. Paris: Librairie Larousse.
9. Fayol, M., Largy, P., & Lemaire, P. (1994). When cognitive overload enhances subject-verb agreement errors. A study in French written language. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 437-464.
10. Franck, J., Collina, S., & Vigliocco, G. (1999). Gender agreement in language production II: When morphophonology hits syntax. In A. Vandierendonck, M. Brysbaert, & K. van der Goten (Eds.), 11th Congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology: Proceedings (p. 245). Gent, Belgium: ESCoP/Academia Press.
11. Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 371-404.
12. Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Volume 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press.
13. Garrett, M.F. (1982). Production of Speech: Observations from normal and pathological language use. In A.W. Ellis (Ed.), Normality and pathology in cognitive functions. London: Academic Press.
14. Harley, T.A. (1993). Connectionist approaches to language disorders. Aphasiology, 7, 221-249.
15. Hartsuiker, R.J., Antón-Méndez, I., & Van Zee, M. (2001). Object attraction in subject-verb agreement construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 546-572.
16. Hartsuiker, R.J., Schriefers, H.J., Bock, J.K., & Kikstra, G.M. (1999). Morphophonological influences on the construction of subject-verb agreement. In A. Vandierendonck, M. Brysbaert, & K. van der Goten (Eds.), 11th Congress of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology: Proceedings (p. 158). Gent, Belgium: ESCOP/Academic Press.
17. Hupet, M., Fayol, M., & Schelstraete, M.-A. (1998). Effects of semantic variables on the subject-verb agreement processes in writing. British Journal of Psychology, 89, 59-75.
18. Largy, P., & Fayol, M. (2001). Oral cues improve subject-verb agreement in written French. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 121-131.
19. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
21. Meyer, A., & Bock, J.K. (1998). Representations and processes in the production of pronouns: Some perspectives from Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 281-301.
22. Pexman, P.M., Lupker, S.J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-156.
23. Seidenberg, M.S., & Tanenhaus, M.K. (1979). Orthographic effects on rhyme monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 546-554.
24. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljacbabic, R., & Richmondwelty, E.D. (1995). The special role of rhymes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 12, 107-136.
25. Vigliocco, G., Anton-Mendez, I., Franck, J., & Collina, S. (1999). Sound and Syntax in Sentence Production: the effect of phonological predictability on syntactic encoding. 5th Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Edinburgh.
26. Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., & Semenza, C. (1995). Constructing subject-verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 186-215.
27. Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 455-478.
28. Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (2001). When sex affects syntax: Gender agreement in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 368-390.
29. Vigliocco, G., Franck, J., Anton-Mendez, I., & Collina, S. (2002a). The interplay between syntax and form in sentence production. An investigation of gender agreement in Romance language. Manuscript submitted for publication.
30. Vigliocco, G., & Hartsuiker, R.J. (2002b). The interplay of meaning, sound and syntax in sentence production. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 442-472.
31. Ziegler, J.C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 683-689.