Cataract surgery in patients with prior refractive surgery

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 44-53

  Hamilton, D Rex ^a,b   Hardten, David R ^a,b,c  

^a MINNESOTA EYE CONSULTANTS   (United States)

^b Regions Medical Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CALCULATION; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CORNEA CURVATURE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

CATARACT EXTRACTION; CORNEA; HUMANS; KERATECTOMY, PHOTOREFRACTIVE, EXCIMER LASER; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OPTICS; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS;

EID: 0037323783     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200302000-00008     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. United States Census 2000 [table 1, page 4]. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/c2kbr01-12.pdf.
2. Vision problems in the US: prevalence of adult vision impairment and age-related eye disease in America. Prevent Blindness America 2002. Available online at: http://www.nei.nih.gov/eyedata/pdf/VPUS.pdf.
3. Leaming DV: Practice styles and preferences of US ASCRS members: 2001 survey with international comparisons. Ocular Surgery News 2002, 20:16-18.
4. Speicher L: Intra-ocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol 2001, 12:17-29.
5. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC: Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990;16:333-340.
6. Holladay JT. Advanced IOL power calculations. 5/26/2000. Handouts available online at http://www.docholladay.com/pdf/calculations.pdf.
7. Holladay JT: Cataract surgery in patients with previous keratorefractive surgery (RK, PRK and LASIK). Ophthalmol Practice 1997, 15:238-244.
8. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al: Refractive power of the human posterior corneal surface in vivo in relation to gender and age. Ophthalmologe 1998, 95:S50.
9. Hernandez-Quintela E, Samapunphong S, et al: Posterior corneal surface changes after refractive surgery. Ophth 2001, 108:1415-1422.
10. Naroo SA, Charman WN: Changes in posterior corneal curvature after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000, 26:872-878.
11. Seitz B, Torres F, et al: Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophth 2001, 108:666-673.
12. Kamiya K, Oshika T, et al: Influence of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on the posterior corneal surface. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000, 26:867-871.
13. Wang Z, Chen J, Yang B: Posterior corneal surface topographic changes after laser in situ keratomileusis are related to residual corneal bed thickness. Ophthalmology 1999, 106:406-409.
14. Patel S, Alio JL, Perez-Santonja JJ: A model to explain the difference between changes in refraction and central ocular surface power after laser in-situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2000, 16:330-335.
15. Koch DD: IOL Calculations after refractive surgery [serial CD-ROM and online]. Highlights of the XIX Congress of the ESCRS: Amsterdam 2001. PhysicianEd, Boston, MA, Available at: http://www.physicianed.com.
16. Seitz B, Langenbucher A: Intraocular lens calculations status after corneal refractive surgery. Curr Opinion Ophthalmol 2000, 11:35-46.
17. Lian J, Ye W, et al: Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with the Technolas 117C. J Refract Surg. 2002, 18:435-438.
18. Ditzen K, Fiedler J, Pieger S: Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 spot scanner. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:430-434.
19. Pineda-Fernandez A, Rueda L, et al: Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism with the Nidek EC-5000 Excimer laser. J Refract Surg 2001, 17:670-675.
20. Stevens JD, Ficker LA: Results of photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia using the VISX Star excimer laser system. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:30-36.
21. McDonald MB, Davidorf J, et al: Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of low to moderate hyperopia: 1-year results on the first 54 eyes. Ophthalmology 2002, 109:637-649.
22. Asbell PA, Maloney RK, et al: Conductive keratoplasty for the correction of hyperopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2001, 99:79-84.
23. Duffey RJ, Leaming D: U.S. trends in refractive surgery: 2001 International Society of Refractive Surgery Survey. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:185-188.
24. Seitz B, Langenbucher A: Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2000, 16:349-361.
25. Holladay JT: IOL calculations following RK. Refract Corneal Surg 1989, 5:203.
26. Hoffer KJ: Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes after refractive keratotomy. J Refract Surg 1995, 11:490-493.
27. Holladay JT: IOLs in LASIK patients: how to get them right the first time. Rev Ophthalmol 8/9/2000:59.
28. Odenthal MTP, Eggink CA et al: Clinical and theoretical results of intraocular lens power calculation for cataract surgery after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Arch Ophthalmol 2002, 120:431-438. • This study examined 15 eyes of 9 patients who underwent cataract extraction following PRK for myopia (pre-PRK SE -6 to -12 D). The study not only reported the clinical results of the cataract surgeries but also examined 8 different methods of measuring or calculating keratometric diopters for IOL calculation (Table 2) utilizing 3 different lens calculation formulas: (SRK/T, Holladay 1, and Hoffer Q). All 6 eyes whose lens calculations were performed using post-PRK K values had hyperopic surprises (range: +1 to +6 D). Theoretical results indicated that the clinical history method performed best of the 8 methods examined. The study also concludes that the Hoffer Q formula, combined with the clinical history method affords the most accurate results.
29. Hoffer KJ: Calculating intraocular lens power after refractive corneal surgery [editorial]. Arch Ophthalmol 2002, 120:500-501.
30. Feiz V, Mannis MJ, et al: Intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and hyperopia. Cornea 2001, 20:792-797.
31. Zeh WG, Koch DD: Comparison of contact lens overrefraction and standard keratometry for measuring corneal curvature in eyes with lenticular opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999, 25:898-903.
32. Rosa N, Iura A, et al: Correlation between automated and subjective refraction before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:449-453.
33. Oyo-Szerenyi KD, Wienecke L, et al: Autorefraction/autokeratometry and subjective refraction in untreated and photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1997, 115:157-164.
34. Salchow DJ, Zirm ME, et al: Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999, 25:827-835.
35. Wilson SE, Klyce SD: Quantitative descriptors of corneal topography: a clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991, 109:349-353.
36. Holladay JT: Corneal topography using the Holladay Diagnostic Summary. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997, 13:209-221.
37. Maeda N, Klyce SD, et al: Disparity between keratometry-style readings and corneal power within the pupil after refractive surgery for myopia. Cornea 1997, 16:517-524.
38. Hamed AM, Wang L, et al: A comparative analysis of five methods of determining corneal refractive power in eyes that have undergone myopic laser in-situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2002, 109:651-8. •• This study examined five different methods for determining corneal refractive power following myopic LASIK. The results showed that the Gaussian optics formula performed better than standard topography (EffRP) and keratometry (K) derived measurements. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that the accuracy of EffRP based calculations of postoperative keratometric diopters can be greatly improved by reducing the value by 0.15 D for each diopter of LASIK-induced refractive correction. Similarly, the accuracy of K based calculations can be improved by reducing the value by 0.24 D for each diopter of LASIK-induced refractive correction.
39. Olsen T: On the calculation of power from curvature of the cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 1986, 70:152-154.
40. Seitz B, Langenbucher A, et al: Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology 1999, 106:693-702.
41. Hugger P, Kohnen T, et al: Comparison of changes in manifest refraction and corneal power after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2000, 129:68-75.
42. RX) - 0.396 (Humphrey Atlas topographer).
43. Gimbel HV, Sunday R, Kaye GB: Refractive error in cataract surgery after previous refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000, 26:142-144.
44. Casebeer JC, Shapiro DR et al: Phacoemulsification after T-hex keratotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993, 19:778-779.
45. Ernest PH: Cataract extraction and IOL implantation post LTK: a case study [abstract 384]. ASCRS Annual Meeting 2000; Boston, MA.
46. Srivannaboon S, Reinstein DZ, et al: Accuracy of Orbscan total optical power maps in detecting refractive change after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999, 25:1596-1599.
47. Wilson SE: Cautions regarding measurements of the posterior corneal curvature. Ophthalmology 2000, 107:1223.
48. Guarnieri FA, Guarnieri JC: Comparison of placido-based, rasterstereography, and slit-scan corneal topography systems. J Refract Surg 2002, 18:169-176.
49. Holladay JT: Stereo topographer adds depth to measurements. Ophthalmology Times 2001, 26(11). Available on-line at http://www.lase.com/proinfo/clinical_data.html
50. Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, et al: Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg 2000, 16:414-430.
51. Gayton JL, Sanders V, et al: Piggybacking intraocular implants to correct pseudophakic refractive error. Ophthalmology 1999, 106:56-59.
52. Schwiegerling JT, Schwartz DM, et al: Light-adjustable intraocular lenses: finessing the outcome. Rev Refract Surg 2002, Vol.3, 2/15/2002. Available online at: http://www.reviewofrefractivesurgery.com/.
53. Ladas JG, Boxer Wachler BS, et al: Intraocular lens power calculations using corneal topography after photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2001, 132:254-255.
54. Gimbel HV, Sun R: Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001, 27:571-576.
55. Gimbel HV, Sun R: Accuracy and predictability of intraocular lens power calculation after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000, 27:1147-1151.