Creating and sustaining a special education/general education partnership: A story of change and uncertainty

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 203-219

  Trent, Stanley C ^a   Driver, Barbara L ^b   Wood, Michele H ^b   Parrott, Patricia S ^b   Martin, Tina F ^b   Smith, W Guy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b Chesterfield County Public Schools   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative teaching; Delivery systems; Learning disabilities; Program implementation; Teaching methods; Team teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037321136     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00104-X     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, L., & Cessna, K. (1993). Metaphors of the co-taught classroom. Preventing School Failure, 37(4), 28-31.
2. Baker, J.M. (1995). Inclusion in Virginia: Educational experiences of students with learning disabilities in one elementary school. Journal of Special Education, 29, 116-123.
3. Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J. J. (1991). Making co-teaching a mainstreaming strategy. Preventing School Failure, 35(4), 19-24.
4. Bauwens, J., & Hourcade, J. J. (1995). Cooperative teaching: Rebuilding the schoolhouse for all students.Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
5. Deshler, D.D. , & Schumaker, J. B.(1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L.Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp.391-411). Washington, DC: NASP.
6. Ellis, E. S., Deshler, D. D., Lenz, B. K., Schumaker, J. B., & Clark, F.L.(1991). An instructional model for teaching learning strategies. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23(6), 1-24.
7. Engeström, Y.(1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp.19-36). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Englert, C. S., Tarrant, K. L., & Rozendal, M. S. (1993). Educational innovations: Achieving curricular change through collaboration. Education and Treatment of Children, 16(4), 441-473.
9. Frank, K.A. (1998). Quantitative methods for studying social context in multilevel and through interpersonal relations. Review of Research in Education, 23, 171-216.
10. Fullan, M.(1991). The new meaning of educational change. NY: Teachers College Press.
11. Fullan, M.(1999). Change forces: The sequel. Philadelphia, PA: Palmer Press.
12. Giangreco, M. F., Dennis, R., Cloninger, C., Edelman, S., & Schatman, R.(1993). I've counted Jon: Transformational experiences of teachers educating students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 359-372.
13. Hallahan, D.P. , & Kauffman, J. M.(2000). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Huberman, M. (1993). The model of the independent artisan in teachers' professional relations. In J. W. Little, & M.W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers' work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 11-50). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Lincoln, Y.S. , & Guba, E.G.(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
17. Lipsky, D.K. , & Gartner, A. (1996). Inclusion, school restructuring, and the remaking of American society. Harvard Educational Review, 66(4), 762-796.
18. Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M.(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Redditt, S. (1991). Two teachers working as one: Co-teaching for special/regular education integration. Equity and Choice, 8(1), 49-56.
21. Rooney, K.(1988). Independent strategies for efficient study. Richmond, VA: J.R. Enterprises.
22. Rozendal, M.(1996). Building bridges between general and special education: The development and dynamics of inter subjectivity in a teacher study group. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Michigan State University, East Lansing.
23. Sarason, S. B., Carroll, C. F., Maton, K., Cohen, S., & Lorentz, E. (1977). Human services and resource networks. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
24. Schumaker, J. B., Nolan, S. M., & Deshler, D. (1985). Learning strategies curriculum: The error monitoring strategy. Lawrence, Kansas: Edge Enterprises, Inc.
25. Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1991). A rationale for integration and restructuring: A synopsis. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Sing, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp.226-239). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Press.
26. Trent, S. C. (1992). Collaboration between regular educators and special educators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
27. Trent, S. C. (1997). Serving urban African-American students with learning disabilities in inclusive settings: Using study groups to facilitate change. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12(2), 132-142.
28. Trent, S. C. (1998). False starts and other dilemmas of a secondary general education collaborative teacher: A case study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 503-513.
29. Trump, J. L. , & Baynham, E.(1963). Guide to better schools: Focus on change. Chicago: Rand McNally.
30. Wolcott, H. F. (1990). On seeing-and rejecting-validity in qualitative research. In E. W. Eisner, & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate (pp. 121-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
31. Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. (1995). Concluding comments: Current and future practices in inclusive schooling. Journal of Special Education, 29, 245-250.