Habitat destruction, habitat restoration and eigenvector-eigenvalue relations

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 181, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 165-176

  Ovaskainen, Otso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Eigenvalue igenvector relation; Habitat destruction; Habitat restoration; Metapopulation dynamics; Patch value; Rank one modification

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

HABITAT DESTRUCTION;

BIODIVERSITY;

EIGENVALUE; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT RESTORATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METAPOPULATION; PATCH DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; HABITAT PATCHINESS; LANDSCAPE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SPECIES HABITAT;

ANIMALS; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0037299868     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-5564(02)00150-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. H. Caswell, Matrix Population Models. Construction, Analysis, and Interpretation, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2001.
2. O. Diekmann, J.A.P. Heesterbeek, Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation, John Wiley, Chichester, 2000.
3. J. Jorgensen, A.M. Rossignol, C.J. Puccia, R. Levins, P.A. Rossignol, On the variance of eigenvalues of the community matrix: Derivation and appraisal, Ecology 81 (2000) 2928.
4. J.B. McGraw, H. Caswell, Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data, Am. Nat. 147 (1996) 47.
5. M.C. Whitlock, N.H. Barton, The effective size of a subdivided population, Genetics 146 (1997) 427.
6. I. Hanski, O. Ovaskainen, The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape, Nature 404 (2000) 755.
7. S. Elhay, G.M.L. Gladwell, G.H. Golub, Y.M. Ram, On some eigenvector-eigenvalue relations, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 20 (1999) 563.
8. G.H. Golub, Some uses of the Lanczos algorith in numerical linear algebra, in: J.H.H. Miller (Ed.), Topics in Numerical Analysis, Springer, Heidelberg, 1973, p. 23.
9. Y.M. Ram, Inverse eigenvalue problems for a modified vibrating system, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 53 (1993) 1762.
10. G.W. Stewart, J. Sun, Matrix Perturbation Theory, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1990.
11. I. Hanski, Metapopulation Ecology, Oxford University, Oxford, 1999.
12. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, Spatially structured metapopulation models: Global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity, Theor. Popul. Biol. 60 (2001) 281.
13. I. Hanski, M. Gyllenberg, Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species, Science 275 (1997) 397.
14. R.S. Etienne, J.A.P. Heesterbeek, Rules of thumb for conservation of metapopulations based on a stochastic winking-patch model, Am. Nat. 158 (2001) 389.
15. O. Ovaskainen, I. Hanski, How Much Does an Individual Habitat Fragment Contribute to Metapopulation Dynamics and Persistence? Manuscript.
16. G.H. Golub, C.E. van Loan, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 1990.
17. D.B. Lindenmayer, H.O. Possingham, Modelling the inter-relationships between habitat patchiness, dispersal capability and metapopulation persistence of the endangered species Leadbeater's possum, in south-eastern Australia, Landsc. Ecol. 11 (1996) 79.
18. P. Gaona, P. Ferreras, M. Delibes, Dynamics and viability of a metapopulation of the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus), Ecol. Monog. 68 (1998) 349.
19. K. McCann, A. Hastings, G.R. Huxel, Weak interactions and the balance of nature, Nature 395 (1998) 794.