Designing optimal flow patterns for fall chinook salmon in a central valley, california, river

North American Journal of Fisheries Management

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-21

  Jager, Henriette I ^a   Rose, Kenneth A ^b  

^a OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FLOW REGULATION; GENETIC VARIATION; RECRUITMENT; SALMONID;

UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 0037297337     PISSN: 02755947     EISSN: 15488675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2003)023<0001:DOFPFF>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allen, M. A., and T. J. Hassler. 1986. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Pacific Southwest): chinook salmon. Report to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Biological Report 82 (11.49) and TR EL-82-4, Washington, D.C., and Vicksburg, Mississippi.
2. Bartholow, J. M., and T. J. Waddle. 1995. The search for an optimum flow regime using a salmon population model. Pages 331-339 in J. J. Cassidy, editor. Waterpower ‘95: proceedings of the international conference on hydropower. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
3. Becker, C. D., D. A. Neitzel, and D. H. Fickeisen. 1982. Effects of dewatering on chinook salmon redds: tolerance of four developmental phases to daily dewaterings. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 111:624-637.
4. Berggren, T. J., and M. J. Filardo. 1993. An analysis of variables influencing the migration of juvenile sal-monids in the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 13:48-63.
5. Bilby, R. E., B. R. Fransen, and P. A. Bisson. 1996. Incorporation of nitrogen and carbon from spawning coho salmon into the trophic system of small streams: evidence from stable isotopes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:164-173.
6. Brett, J. R. 1952. Temperature tolerance in young pacific salmon, genus Oncorhynchus. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 9:265-309.
7. Cada, G. F., M. D. Deacon, S. V. Mitz, and M. S. Be-velhimer. 1993. Review of information pertaining to the effect of water velocity on the survival of juvenile salmon and steelhead in the Columbia River basin. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon.
8. Cederholm, C. J., M. D. Kunze, T. Murota, and A. Si-batani. 1999. Pacific salmon carcasses. Fisheries 24(10):6-15.
9. Cramer, S. P. 1997. Use of managed pulses in flow to stimulate outmigration of juvenile salmon. Pages 563-568 in S. Y. Wang and T. Carstens, editors. Environmental and coastal hydraulics: protecting the aquatic habitat. Proceedings of theme B, water for a changing global community, 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
10. EAEST (EA Engineering, Science, and Technology). 1992a. Tuolumne River salmon spawning surveys, 1971-1988. Report of Turlock irrigation districtand Modesto irrigation district pursuant to Article 39 of the license for the Don Pedro Project, volume 2, appendix 3. Prepared for Turlock irrigation district, Turlock, California, and Modesto irrigation district, Modesto, California.
11. EAEST (EA Engineering, Science, and Technology). 1992b. Analysis of 1981 Lower Tuolumne River IFIM data. Report of Turlock irrigation district and Modesto irrigation district pursuant to Article 39 of the license for the Don Pedro Project, volume 3, appendix 5. Prepared for Turlock irrigation district, Turlock, California, and Modesto irrigation district, Modesto, California.
12. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1971. Columbia River thermal effects study, volume 1, biological effects studies. Cooperative Report with the Atomic Energy Commission and the National Marine Fisheries Service, Portland, Oregon.
13. FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission). 1996. Final environmental impact statement. Reservoir release requirements for fish at the New Don Pedro Project, California. FERC, FERC-EIS-0081-F, Washington, D. C.
14. Fisher, F. 1994. Past and present status of Central Valley chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 8:870-873.
15. Fleming, I. A., and M. R. Gross. 1994. Breeding competition in a Pacific salmon (coho: Oncorhynchus kisutch): measures of natural and sexual selection. Evolution 48:637-657.
16. Fry, D. H. 1961. King salmon spawning stocks of the California Central Valley, 1940-1959. California Fish and Game 47:55-71.
17. Geman, S., and D. Geman. 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution and the Bayesian restoration in images. IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) Transactions in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6:721-741.
18. Goffe, W. L., G. D. Ferrier, and J. Rogers. 1994. Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing. Journal of Econometrics 60:65-99.
19. Grant, J. W. A., and D. L. Kramer. 1990. Territory size as a predictor of the upper limit to population density of juvenile salmonids in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:1724-1737.
20. Hatton, R. S., and G. H. Clark. 1942. A second progress report on the Central Valley fishery investigations. California Fish and Game 28:116-123.
21. Healey, M. C. 1994. Variation in the life history characteristics of chinook salmon and its relevance to conservation of the Sacramento winter run of chinook salmon. Conservation Biology 8:876-877.
22. Healey, M. C., and A. Prince. 1995. Scales of variation in life history tactics of Pacific salmon and the conservation of phenotype and genotype. Pages 176-184 in Nielsen and Powers(1995).
23. Holling, C. S. 1959. Some simple types of predation and parasitism. Canadian Entomologist 91:385398.
24. Huntington, C., W. Nehlsen, and J. Bowers. 1996. A survey of healthy native stocks of anadromous sal-monids in the Pacific Northwest and California. Fisheries 21(3):6-14.
25. Independent Scientific Group. 1996. Return to the river: restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River ecosystem. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon.
26. Jager, H. I. 2000. Predicting the viability of fish populations in a modified riverine environment. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
27. Jager, H. I., H. E. Cardwell, M. J. Sale, M. S. Bevelhimer, C. C. Coutant, and W. VanWinkle. 1997. Modelling the linkages between flow management and salmon recruitment in streams. Ecological Modelling 103: 171-191.
28. Jensen, A. J., and B. O. Johnsen. 1999. The functional relationship between peak spring floods and survival and growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta). Functional Ecology 13:778-785.
29. Kirkpatrick, S., J. C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220: 671-680.
30. Kjelson, M. A., and P. L. Brandes. 1989. The use of smolt survival estimates to quantify the effects of habitat changes on salmonid stocks in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Rivers, California. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 105:100-115.
31. Kope, R. G., and L. W. Botsford. 1990. Determination of factors affecting recruitment of chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha in central California. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 88:257-269.
32. Lackey, R. T. 1999. Salmon policy: science, society, restoration, and reality. Environmental Science and Policy 2:369-379.
33. Lettenmaier, D. P., and T. Y. Gan. 1990. Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River basin, California, to global warming. Water Resources Research 26:69-86.
34. Li, H. W., K. Currens, D. Bottom, S. Clarke, J. Dam-bacher, C. Frissell, P. Harris, R. M. Hughes, D. McCullough, A. McGie, K. Moore, R. Nawa, and S. Thiele. 1995. Safe havens: refuges and evolu-tionarily significant units. Pages 371-380 in Nielsen and Powers
35. McBain, S., and W. Trush. 2000. Habitat restoration plan for the lower Tuolumne River corridor. Prepared for the Tuolumne River Technical Advisory Committee, Turlock, California.
36. Metropolis, N., A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics 21:1087-1092.
37. Moyle, P. 1994. The decline of anadromous fishes in California. Conservation Biology 8:869-870.
38. Moyle, P. B., and R. M. Yoshiyama. 1997. The role of adaptive management in restoring chinook salmon to the Tuolumne River. Pages 557-562 in S. Y. Wang and T. Carstens, editors. Environmental and coastal hydraulics: protecting the aquatic habitat. Proceedings of theme B, water for a changing global community, 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
39. Murray, C. B., and J. D. McPhail. 1988. Effect of incubation temperature on the development of five species of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus) embryos and alevins. Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:266273.
40. Myers, J. M., R. G. Kope, G. J. Bryant, D. Teel, L. J. Lierheimer, T. C. Wainwright, W. S. Grant, F. W. Waknitz, K. Neely, S. T. Lindley, and R. S. Waples. 1998. Status review of chinook salmon from Washington, Idaho, Oregon, and California. U.S. Department of Commerce, NMFS-NWFSC-35, Washington, D.C.
41. National Marine Fisheries Service. 1999. Endangered and threatened species; threatened status for two chinook salmon evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) in California. Federal Register 64:156 (17 August 1999):50394-50415.
42. National Research Council. 1996. Upstream: salmon and society in the Pacific Northwest. National Academy Press, Washington D. C.
43. Nehlsen, W., J. E. Williams, and J. A. Lichatowich. 1991. Pacific salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries 16(2):4-21.
44. Nielsen, J. L., and D. A. Powers, editors. 1995. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 17, Bethesda, Maryland.
45. Nielsen, J. L., D. Tupper, and W. K. Thomas. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in unique runs of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from the Sacramento-San Joaquin River basin. Conservation Biology 8:882-884.
46. Paterson, A. M. 1987. Land, water, and power: a history of the Turlock Irrigation District, 1887-1987. Arthur H. Clark Company, Glendale, California.
47. Peterson, J. H., and D. L. DeAngelis. 1992. Functional response and capture timing in an individual-based model: predation by northern squawfish (Ptychoch-eilus oregonensis) on juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:2551-2565.
48. Petts, G. E. 1984. Page 196 in Impounded rivers. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
49. Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime. BioScience 47:769-784.
50. Pressey, R. L., H. P. Possingham, and J. R. Day. 1997. Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves. Biological Conservation 80: 207-219.
51. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132:652-661.
52. Reeves, G. H., L. E. Benda, K. M. Burnett, P. A. Bisson, and J. R. Sedell. 1995. A disturbance-based ecosystem approach to maintaining and restoring freshwater habitats of evolutionarily significant units of anadromous salmonids in the Pacific Northwest. Pages 334-349 in Nielsen and D. A. Powers(1995).
53. Smith, G., J. Rosenfield, and J. Porterfield. 1995. Processes of origin and criteria for preservation of fish species. Pages 44-57 in Nielsen and D. A. Pow-ers(1995).
54. Speed, T. 1993. Modeling and managing a salmon population. Pages 267-292 in V. Barnett and K. F. Turkman, editors. Statistics for the environment. Wiley, New York.
55. Stanford, J. A., J. V. Ward, W. J. Liss, C. A. Frissell, R. N. Williams, J. A. Lichatowich, and C. C. Coutant. 1996. A general protocol for restoration of regulated rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 12:391-413.
56. Stevens, D. E., and L. W. Miller. 1983. Effects of river flow on abundance of young chinook salmon, American shad, longfin smelt, and delta smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3:425-437.
57. Stewart, D. J., D. Weininger, D. V. Rottiers, and T. A. Edsal. 1983. An energetics model for lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush: application to the Lake Michigan population. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40:681-698.
58. Unwin, M. J. 1997. Survival of chinook salmon, On-corhynchus tshawytscha, from a spawning tributary of the Rakaia River, New Zealand, in relation to spring and summer mainstem flows. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 95:812-825.
59. Utter, F. M., D. W. Chapman, and A. R. Marshall. 1995. Genetic population structure and history of chinook salmon of the Upper Columbia River. Pages 149-168 in Nielsen (1995).
60. Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. Pages 8-27 in Nielsen and Powers(1995).
61. Williams, J. G., and G. M. Matthews. 1995. A review of flow and survival relationships for spring and summer chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawyts-cha, from the Snake River basin. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 93:732-740.
62. Willson, M. F., and K. C. Halupka. 1995. Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conservation Biology 9:489-497.
63. Yoshiyama, R., E. R. Gerstung, F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 2000. Chinook salmon in the California Central Valley: an assessment. Fisheries 25(2):6-20