Feature importance in feature generation and typicality rating

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-18

  Vanoverberghe, Veerle ^a   Storms, Gert ^b  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACT; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0037251622     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440303600     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Ahn, W. (1998). Why are different features central for natural kinds and artefacts? The role of causal status in determining feature importance. Cognition, 69, 135-178.
2. American Heritage Dictionary. (1969). New York: American Heritage Publishing Co.
3. Barton, M.E., & Komatsu, L.K. (1989). Defining features of natural kinds and artefacts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 433-447.
4. Battig, W.F., & Montague, W.E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut Category Norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3), Pt. 2.
5. Caramazza, A. (1998). The interpretation of semantic category-specific deficits: What do they reveal about the organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain? Neurocase, 4, 265-272.
6. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
7. De Wilde, E., Vanoverberghe, V., Storms, G., & De Boeck, P. (in press). The instantiation principle re-evaluated. Memory.
8. Dunn, G. (1989). Design and analysis of reliability studies: The statistical evaluation of measurement errors. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Farah, M.J. (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of vision. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
10. Farah, M.J., & McClelland, J.L. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specifity and emergent category specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 120, 339-357.
11. Farah, M.J., Meyer, M.M., & McMullen, P.A. (1996). The living/nonliving dissociation is not an artifact: Giving an a priori implausible hypothesis a strong test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 137-154.
12. Gelman, S.A. (1988). The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65-95.
13. Hampton, J.A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 441-461.
14. Hampton, J.A. (1993). Prototype models of concept representation. In I. Van Mechelen, J. Hampton, R.S. Michalski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 67-95). London: Academic Press.
15. Hampton, J.A., & Gardiner, M.M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 498-516.
16. Heit, E. (2001). Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 569-592.
17. Heit, E., & Barsalou, L.W. (1996). The instantiation principle in natural categories. Memory, 4, 431-451.
18. Keil, F.C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Keller, D., & Kellas, G. (1978). Typicality as a dimension of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 78-85.
20. Malt, B.C. (1990). Features and beliefs in the mental representation of categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 289-315.
21. Malt, B.C., & Johnson, E.C. (1992). Do artifact concepts have cores? Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 195-217.
22. Malt, B.C., & Smith, E.E. (1984). Correlated properties in natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
23. Martin, A., Ungerleider, L.G., & Haxby, J.V. (2000). Category specificity and the brain: The sensory/ motor model of semantic representations of objects. In M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (2nd ed., pp. 1023-1036). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Osherson, D.N., Smith, E.E., Wilkie, O., Lopéz, A., & Shafir, E. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97, 185-200.
25. Rips, L.J. (1975). Inductive judgments about natural categories. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 665-681.
26. Rips, L.J. (1989). Similarity, typicality, and categorization. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
28. Rosch, E. (1977). Human categorization. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1-49). London: Academic Press.
29. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
30. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 383-439.
31. Sloman, S.A., Love, B.C., & Ahn, W. (1998). Feature importance and conceptual coherence. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 189-228.
32. Smith, E.E., & Medin, D.M. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Storms, G., De Boeck, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Geeraerts, D. (1993). Dominance and noncommutativity effects in concept conjunctions: Extensional or intensional basis? Memory and Cognition, 21(6), 752-762.
34. Tyler, L.K., & Moss, H.E. (1997). Functional properties of concepts: Studies of normal and brain-damaged patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 511-545.
35. Verbeemen, T., Vanoverberghe, V., Storms, G., & Ruts, W. (2001). The role of contrast categories in natural language concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 618-643.
36. Warrington, E.K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-854.
37. Wisniewski, E.J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 167-183.