Dose reduction of radiographs of the pediatric pelvis for diagnosing hip dysplasia using a digital flat-panel detector system;Dosisreduktion bei röntgenaufnahmen des kindlichen beckenskelettes zur diagnostik der hüftgelenksdysplasie unter verwendung eines digitalen flachdetektorsystems

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 175, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 112-117

  Ludwig, K ^a   Ahlers, K ^a   Sandmann, C ^b   Gosheger, G ^b   Kloska, S ^a   Vieth, V ^a   Meier, N ^a   Heindel, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Congenital hip dysplasia; Digital radiography; Radiation protection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; PELVIS RADIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; STUDENT T TEST;

AGE FACTORS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INFANT; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 0037250336     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-36597     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. 2 amorphous silicon flat panel X-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. Med Phys 2000; 27: 1324-1331
2. Floyd CE, Warp RJ, Dobbins JT, et al. Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. Radiology 2001; 218: 683-688
3. Spahn M, Strotzer M, Volk M, et al. Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system. Invest Radiol 2000; 35: 260-266
4. Andriole KP, Gould RG, Luth DM. Workflow comparison of DR and screen-film dedicated chest systems. Proc SPIE 2001; 4323: 203-206
5. Buckup K. Bildgebende Verfahren. In: Grifka J., Ludwig J. (Hrsg). Kindliche Hüftdysplasie. Stuttgart, New York: Thieme, 1998: 131-148
6. Fiebich M, Bick U, Wessel-Therhorn M, Wiesmann W. Retrospective analysis of patient dose using digital luminescence radiography in a pediatric intensive care unit. Radiology 1993; 189: 162
7. Ludwig K, Lenzen H, Kamm KF, et al. Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography. Radiology 2002; 222: 453-459
8. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser JK, Volk M, Frund R, Seitz J, Feuerbach S. Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose: comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 98-103
9. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Spahn M, et al. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, X-ray detector versus screen-film radiography: effect of dose reduction on the detectability of cortical bone defects and fractures. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 33-38
10. Strotzer M, Volk M, Wild T, von Landenberg P, Feuerbach S. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 2000; 215: 512-515
11. Strotzer M, Gmeinwieser J, Volk M, et al. Clinical application of a flat-panel X-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography. AJR 1998; 171: 23-27
12. Volk M, Strotzer M, Holzknecht N, et al. Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for exposure dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography. Clin Radiology 2000; 55: 615-621
13. Hamers S, Freyschmidt J, Neitzel U. Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs screen-film radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1753-1759
14. Garmer M, Hennigs SP, Jager HJ, et al. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study. AJR 2000; 174: 75-80
15. Hennigs SP, Garmer M, Jaeger HJ, et al. Digital chest radiography with a large-area flat-panel silicon X-ray detector: clinical comparison with conventional radiography. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1688-1696
16. Strotzer M, Volk M, Frund R, Hamer O, Zorger N, Feuerbach S. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction. AJR 2002; 178: 169-171
17. Herrmann A, Bonel S, Stabler A, et al. Chest imaging with flat-panel detector at low and standard doses: comparison with storage-phosphor technology in normal patients. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 385-390
18. Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Kastner A, Theus U, Fiedler R, Krause U, Dohring W. Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit einem grogformatigen Flächendetektorsystem bei Aufnahmen des peripheren Skelettsystems. Teil 1: halbierte Patientendosis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 1048-1052
19. Reissberg S, Hoeschen C, Kastner A, Theus U, Fiedler R, Krause U, Dohring W. Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit einem grogformatigen Flächendetektorsystem bei Aufnahmen des peripheren Skelettsystems. Teil 2: Nachverarbeitung mit einem neu entwickelten adaptiven Autofesteralgorithmus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 353-356
20. Graf R. Hüftsonographie - Ein Update. Orthopäde 2002; 31: 181-190
21. Debrunner AM. Orthopädie, Orthopädische Chirurgie: Die Störung des Bewegungsapparates in Klinik und Praxis. Huber, 1995; 709-711
22. Jäger M, Wirth CJ. Praxis der Orthopädie. Thieme, 2001; 624-625
23. Ruiz MJ, Gonzalez L, Vano E, Martinez A. Measurement of radiation doses in the most frequent simple examinations in paediatric radiology and its dependence on patient age. Br Journal of Radiology 1991; 64: 929-933
24. Hufton AP, Doyle SM, Carty HM. Digital radiography in paediatrics: radiation dose considerations and magnitude of possible dose reduction. Br Journal of Radiology 1998; 71: 186-199