Confronting prejudice (literally): Reactions to confrontations of racial and gender bias

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 532-544

  Czopp, Alexander M ^a   Monteith, Margo J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Confrontation; Prejudice reduction; Racism; Sexism

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

AFFECT; ATTITUDE; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MINORITY GROUPS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PREJUDICE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES; WOMEN;

EID: 0037234107     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167202250923     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 361-382). New York: Guilford.
3. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Personal narratives about guilt: Role in action control and interpersonal relationships. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 173-198.
4. Blanchard, F. A., Crandall, C. S., Brigham, J. C., & Vaughn, L. A. (1994). Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial sellings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 993-997.
5. Blanchard, F. A., Lilly, T., & Vaughn, L. A. (1991). Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 2, 101-105.
6. Brigham, J. C. (1993). College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933-1267.
7. Cowan, G., & Hodge, C. (1996). Judgments of hate speech. The effects of target group, publicness, and behavioral responses of the target. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 355-374.
8. Devine, P. G., & Monteith, M.J. (1999). Automaticity and control in stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 339-360). New York: Guilford.
9. Devine, P. G., Monteith, M.J., Zuwerink, J. R., & Elliot, A. J. (1991). Prejudice with and without compunction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 817-830.
10. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. ( 1978). Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 424-435.
11. Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). Motivating individuals to change: What is a target to do? In C. N. Macrae, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
12. El Nasser, H. (2001, March 11). Diverse populations grow. USA Today. Retrieved August 17, 2001, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/census/2001-03-11-overview-usat.htm#more.
13. Fazio, R. H., & Hilden, L. E. (2001). Emotional reactions to a seemingly prejudiced response: The role of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 539-549.
14. Feagin, J. R. (1991). The continuing significance of race: Anti-Black discrimination in public places. American Sociological Review, 56, 101-116.
15. Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What's so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp & M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society. Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 173-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. ( 1986). The aversive form of racism. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Rust, M. C., Nier, J. A., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., Mottola, G. R., & Houlette, M. (1999). Reducing intergroup bias: Elements of intergroup cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 388-102.
18. Click, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory. Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
19. Click, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001 ). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and resentful prejudice. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Kaiser, C. R., & Miller, C. T. (2001). Stop complaining! The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254-263.
21. Kawakami, K., Dovidio, J. F., Moll, J., Hermsen, S., & Russin, A. (2000). Just say no (to stereotyping): Effects of training in the negation of Stereotypic associations on stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 871-888.
22. Kowalski, R. (1996). Complaints and complaining: Functions, antecedents, and consequences. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 179-196.
23. McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In J. F. Dovidio & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61-89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Monteith, M. J. (1993). Self-regulation of prejudiced responses: Implications for progress in prejudice reduction efforts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 469-485.
25. Monteith, M. J., Ashburn-Nardo, L. A., Voils, C. I., & Czopp, A. M. (2002). Putting the brakes on prejudice: On the development and operation of cues for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1029-1050.
26. Monteith, M.J., Deneen, N. E., & Tooman, G. D. (1996). The effect of norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and Blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 118, 267-288.
27. Monteith, M.J., Devine, P. G., & Zuwerink, J. R. (1993). Self-directed versus other-directed affect as a consequence of prejudice-related discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 198-210.
28. Monteith, M. J., & Voils, C. I. (1998). Proneness to prejudiced responses: Toward understanding the authenticity of self-reported discrepancies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 901-916.
29. Moskowitz, G. B., Gollwitzer, P. M., Wasel, W., & Schaal, B. (1999). Preconscious control of stereotype activation through chronic egalitarian goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 167-184.
30. Myrdal, G. (1944). An American dilemma. New York: Harper & Row.
31. Petty, R. E., Fleming, M. A., Priester, J. R., & Feinstein, A. H. (2001). Individual versus group interest violation: Surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Social Cognition, 19, 418-442.
32. Ratner, R. K., & Miller, D. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5-16.
33. Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2001). Simulation, scenarios, and emotional appraisal: Testing the convergence of real and imagined reactions to emotional stimuli. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1520-1532.
34. Rodin, M.J., Price, J. M., Bryson, J. B., & Sanchez, F.J. (1990). Asymmetry in prejudice attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 481-504.
35. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
36. Shelton, J. N. (2000). A reconceptualization of how we study issues of racial prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 374-390.
37. Swim, J. K., Cohen, L. L., & Hyers, L. L. (1998). Experiencing everyday prejudice and discrimination. In J. K. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 37-60). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me-what did you just say?!: Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.