A profile of faculty reading and information-use behaviors on the cusp of the electronic age

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 179-181

  Belefant Miller, Helen ^a   King, Donald W ^b  

^a Dale Bumpers Natl Rice Res Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

ELECTRONIC AGE;

ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING;

EID: 0037232531     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10180     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Belefant-Miller, H., & King, D.W. (2001). How, what, and why science faculty read. Science and Technology Libraries, 19, 91-112.
2. Bonzi, S. (1992). Trends in research productivity among senior faculty. Information Processing and Management, 28, 111-120.
3. Busch, L., & Lacey, W.B. (1983). Science, agriculture, and the politics of research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
4. Ellis, D., Cox, D., & Hall, K. (1993). A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49, 356-369.
5. Griffiths, J.-M. & King, D.W. (1993). Special Libraries: Increasing the information edge. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association.
6. Hurd, J.M., & Weller, A.C. (1997). From prim to electronic: The adoption of information technology by academic chemists. Science and Technology Libraries, 16, 147-170.
7. Kaminer, N., & Braunstein, Y.M. (1998). Bibliometric analysis of the impact of internet use on scholarly productivity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 720-730.
8. King, D.W., & Tenopir, C. (1999). Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
9. Krohn, R.G. (1961). The institutional location of the scientist and his scientific values. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-8, 133-138.
10. Lazinger, S.S., Bar-Ilan, J., & Peritz, B.C. (1997). Internet use by faculty members in various disciplines: A comparative case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48, 508-518.
11. Mac Lane, S. (1996). Should universities imitate industry? American Scientist, 84, 520-521.
12. Schuegraf, E.J., Keliher, L.T., & van Bommel, M.F. (1992). An analysis of personal journal subscriptions of university faculty. Part 1. Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 28-33.
13. Tenopir, C., & King, D.W. (2001). Lessons for the future of journals. Nature, 413, 672-674.
14. Tomney, H., & Burton, P.F. (1998). Electronic journals: A study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24, 419-429.
15. Van den Berghe, H., Houben, J.A., de Bruin, R.E., Moed, H.F., Kint, A., Luwel, M., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (1998). Bibliometric indicators of university research performance in Flanders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 59-67.
16. Wanner, R.A., Lewis, L.S., & Gregorio, D.I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences and humanities. Sociology of Education, 54, 238-253.
17. Ziman, J.M. (1968). Public knowledge (p. 105). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.