From Print to Electronic: The Adoption of Information Technology by Academic Chemists

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 16, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 147-170

  Hurd, Julie M ^a   Weiler, Ann C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000558463     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J122v16n03_10     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Abels, Eileen G., Liebscher, Peter, and Denman, Daniel W., 1996. “Factors that Influence the Use of Electronic Networks by Science and Engineering Faculty at Small Institutions. Part I. Queries”. Journal of the American Society far Information Science, 47(2) February:146–158.
2. Adams, Judith A, and Bonk, Sharon C., 1995. “Electronic Information Technologies and Resources:Use by University Faculty and Faculty Preferences for Related Library Services.”. College and Research Libraries, 56(2) March:119–131.
3. Curtis, Karen L., Weiler, Ann C., and Hurd, Julie M., 1993. “Information Seeking Behavior:A Survey of Health Sciences Faculty Use of Indexes and Databases.”. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 81(4) October:383–392.
4. Curtis, Karen L., Weiler, Ann C, and Hurd, Julie M., “Information Seeking Behavior of Health Sciences Faculty:The Impact of New Information Technologies.”. In Bulletin of the Medical Library Association In press.
5. Heller, Stephen R., 1996. “Chemistry on the Internet-the Road to Everywhere and Nowhere.”. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 36(2) March/April:205–213.
6. Hurd, Julie M., 1993. “Cross-disciplinary Information Use by College of Pharmacy Faculty.”. Presented in session on “Interdisciplinarity in Science:Information Needs of Converging Disciplines” at the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. October1993, Columbus, OH.
7. Hurd, Julie M., 1992. “Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences:Implications for Library Organization.”. College & Research Libraries, 53 July:283–297.
8. Hurd, Julie M., Weiler, Ann C., and Curtis, Karen L., “Information Seeking Behavior of Faculty:Use of Indexes and Abstracts by Scientists and Engineers.”. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science. October1992, Pittsburgh, PA. pp.136–143.
9. Hurd, Julie M, Weiler, Ann C., and Curtis, Karen L., “Information Seeking Behavior of Science and Engineering Faculty:The Impact of New Information Technologies.”. Pmceedings of the American Society for Information Science Mid-Year Meeting. May1996, San Diego, CA. pp.188–196.
10. Martin, Elaine Russo, and Lanier, Don., 1995. “Delivering Medical Information to the Desktop:The UIC GRATEFUL-MED-via-the-Internet Experience.”. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 83(4) October:402–406.
11. Mooers, Calvin N., 1996. “Mooers' Law or Why Some Retrieval Systems Are Used and Others Are Not”. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 23(1) October/November:22–23.
12. Philip, G., 1995. “Use of “Leading-Edge” Information Systems by Academic Chemists in the UK:Part 1. The Results of a Preliminary Investigation.”. Journal of Information Science, 2(3):187–199.
13. Rogers, Everett M., 1995. Diffusion of Innovations., Fourth Edition, New York:The Free Press.
14. Shaw, Debora, and Charles, Davis H., 1996. “The Modern Language Association:Elecironic and Paper Surveys of Computer-Based Tool Use.”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(12):932–940.
15. Walsh, John P., and Bayma, Todd., 1996. “Computer Networks and Scientific Work.”. Social Studies of Science, 26:661–703.
16. Walsh, John P., and Bayma, Todd., 1996. “The Virtual College:Computer-Mediated Communication and Scientific Work.”. The Information Society, 9:343–363.