Spatial harvest scheduling approach for areas involving multiple ownership

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 27-38

  Jumppanen, Juha ^a   Kurttila, Mikko ^b   Pukkala, Timo ^c   Uuttera, Janne ^d  

^a Metsämannut Oy ^*  (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^d Forestry Development Centre Tapio   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest planning; Private forest holdings; Resource clustering; Spatial objectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037230383     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00044-8     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andrén, H., 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71, 355-366.
2. Angelstam, P., 1992. Conservation of communities - the importance of edges, surroundings and landscape mosaic structure. In: Hansson, L. (Ed.), Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 9-70.
3. Angelstam, P., Mikusinski, G., 1994. Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest - a review. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31, 157-172.
4. Edenius, L., Elmberg, J., 1996. Landscape level effects of modern forestry on bird communities in North Swedish boreal forests. Landscape Ecology 11, 325-338.
5. Esseen, P.-A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., Sjöberg, K., 1992. Boreal forests - the focal habitats of Fennoscandia. In: Hansson, L. (Ed.), Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 252-325.
6. Fries, C., Lindén, G., Nillius, E., 1998. The stream model for ecological landscape planning in non-industrial private forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13, 370-378.
7. Haila, Y., 1994. Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31, 203-217.
8. Helle, P., Helle, T., Lindén, H., 1994. Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking sites in fragmented Finnish forest landscape. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9, 386-396.
9. Hoganson, H.M., Borges, J.G., 2000. Impacts of the time horizon for adjacency constraints in harvest scheduling. Forest Science 46, 176-187.
10. Jokimäki, J., Huhta, E., 1996. Effects of landscape matrix and habitat structure on a bird community in northern Finland: a multi-scale approach. Omis Fennica 73, 97-113.
11. Kangas, J., Pukkala, T., 1996. Operationalization of biological diversity as a decision objective in tactical forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26, 103-111.
12. Kurttila, M., 2001. The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning - a landscape ecological perspective. Forest Ecology and Management 142, 127-140.
13. Kurttila, M., Uuttera, J., Mykra, S., Kurki, S., Pukkala, T., 2002a. Decreasing the fragmentation of old forests in landscapes involving multiple ownership in Finland: economic, social and ecological consequences. Forest Ecology and Management 166, 69-84.
14. Kurttila, M., Pukkala, T., Loikkanen, J., 2002b. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. Forest Ecology and Management 166, 245-260.
15. Kuusela, K., 1990. The dynamics of boreal coniferous forests. SITRA Helsinki 172.
16. Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
17. Luonnonläheinen, metsänhoito, 1994. Metsänhoitosuositukset. Metsäkeskus Tapion julkaisuja 6, 74.
18. McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J., 1995. FRAGSTATS. Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service, PNW, General Technical Report, 351.
19. Mönkkönen, M., Reunanen, E, Nikula, A., Inkeriöinen, J., Forsman, J., 1997. Landscape characteristics associated with the occurrence of the flying squirrel Pteromys volans in old-growth forests of northern Finland. Ecography 20, 634-642.
20. Mykrä, S., Kurki, S., 1998. ESC strategy for rational operationalization of forest biodiversity maintenance in Finland. Silva Fennica 32, 389-399.
21. Mykrä, S., Kurki, S., Nikula, A., 2000. The spacing of mature forest habitat in relation to species-specific scales in managed boreal forests in NE Finland. Annales Zoologici Fennici 37, 79-91.
22. Öhman, K., Eriksson, L.O., 1998. The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28, 1032-1039.
23. Pesonen, M., 1995. Non-industrial private forest landowners' choices of timber management strategies and potential allowable cut: case of Pohjois-Savo. Acta Forestalia Fennica 247, 31.
24. Pukkala, T., 2000. MONSU metsäsuunnitteluohjelma. Users manual.
25. Pukkala, T., Kangas, J., 1993. A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8, 560-570.
26. Pykäläinen, J., Pukkala, T., Kangas, J., 2001. Alternative priority models for forest planning on the landscape level involving multiple ownership. Forest Policy and Economics 2, 293-306.
27. Rolstad, J., Wegge, P., 1987. Distribution and size of capercaillie leks in relation to old forest fragmentation. Oecologia 72, 389-394.
28. Sessions, J., 1992. Solving for habitat connections as a Steiner network problem. Forest Science 38, 203-207.
29. Siitonen, J., Martikainen, P., 1994. Occurrence of rare and threatened insects living on decaying Populus tremula: a comparison between Finnish and Russian Karelia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9, 185-191.
30. Siitonen, P., Lehtinen, A., 1999. Metsien monimuotoisuuden arviointi. Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A. No 99.
31. Wiens, J.A., Stenseth, N.C.hr., Van Horne, B., Ims, R.A., 1993. Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66, 369-380.
32. Virkkala, R., 1991. Population trends of forest birds in Finnish Lapland in a landscape of large habitat blocks: consequences of stochastic environmental variation or regional habitat alteration? Biological Conservation 56, 223-240.