The core area concept in forming contiguous areas for long-term forest planning

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 1032-1039

  Öhman, Karin ^a   Eriksson, Ljusk Ola ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE AREA CONCEPT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; LONG TERM FOREST PLANNING;

ECOSYSTEMS; HARVESTING; PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

FORESTRY;

EDGE EFFECT; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

EID: 0032125304     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x98-076     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71: 355-366.
2. Angelstam, P., and Andrén, H. 1993. Hur mycket är nog. [In Swedish.] Skogforskning, 1: 14-19.
3. Anonymous. 1994. Swedish forestry act. [In Swedish.] Swedish National Board of Forestry, Jönköping.
4. Anonymous. 1996. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 1996. Swedish National Board of Forestry, Jönköping.
5. Baskent, E.Z., and Jordan, G.A. 1995. Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1830-1849.
6. Bettinger, P., Sessions, J., and Boston, K. 1997. Using Tabu search to schedule timber harvests subject to spatial wildlife goals for big game. Ecol. Modell. 94: 111-123.
7. Bos, J. 1993. Zoning in forest management: a quadratic assignment problem solved by simulated annealing. J. Environ. Manage. 37: 127-145.
8. Connolly, D.T. 1990. An improved annealing scheme for the QAP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 46: 93-100.
9. Dahlin, B., and Sallnäs, O. 1993. Harvest scheduling under adjacency constraints - a case study from the Swedish sub-alpine region. Scand. J. For. Res. 8: 281-290.
10. Esseen, P. A., Ehnström, B., Ericson, L., and Sjöberg, K. 1992. Boreal forests. The focal habitats of Fennoscandia. In Ecological principles of nature conservation. Edited by L. Hansson. Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 252-325.
11. Franklin, J.F., and Forman, R.T. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecol. 1: 5-18.
12. Gustafson, E.J. 1996. Expanding the scale of forest management: allocating timber harvests in time and space. For. Ecol. Manage. 87: 27-39.
13. Gustafson, E.J., and Crow, T R. 1994. Modelling the effects of forest harvesting on landscape structure and the spatial distribution of cowbird brood parasitism. Landscape Ecol. 9(4): 237-248.
14. Gustafson, E.J., and Crow, T.R. 1996. Simulating the effects of alternative forest management strategies on landscape structure. J. Environ. Manage. 46: 77-94.
15. Harris, L.D. 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.
16. Hof, J.G., and Joyce, L.A. 1992. Spatial optimization for wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 38(3): 489-508.
17. Hof, J.G., and Joyce, L.A. 1993. A mixed integer linear programming approach for spatially optimizing wildlife and timber in managed forest ecosystems. For. Sci. 39(4): 816-834.
18. Hof, J., Bevers, M., Joyce, L., and Kent, B. 1994. An integer programming approach for spatially and temporally optimizing wildlife populations. For. Sci. 40(1): 177-191.
19. Kirby, M.W., Hager, W.A., and Wong, P. 1986. Simultaneous planning of wildland management and transportation alternatives. Manage. Sci. 21: 371-387.
20. Lockwood, C., and Moore, T 1993. Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: a simulated annealing approach. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 468-478.
21. Murray, A.T., and Church, R.L. 1996. Analyzing cliques for imposing adjacency restrictions in forests. For. Sci. 42(2): 166-175.
22. Nelson, J.D., and Finn, S.T. 1991. The influence on cut-block size and adjacency rules on harvest levels and road networks. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 595-600.
23. Nelson, J.D., and Howard, A.F. 1991. A three-stage heuristic procedure for allocating spatially and temporally feasible cutting rights on public lands. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 762-768.
24. Nilsson, N-E. 1978. Produktionsmall for tidsfördelning av framtida slutawerkningar och gallringar. [In Swedish.] SOU 1978:7 Appendix 4. Liber Förlag, Stockholm, Sweden. pp. 239-254.
25. O'Hara, A.J., Faaland, B.H., and Bare, B. 1989. Spatially constrained timber harvest scheduling. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 715-724.
26. Ollas, R. 1980. Nya utbytesfunktioner för träd och bestånd. [In Swedish.] Resultat-ekonomi No. 1980:5. Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten, Stockholm, Sweden.
27. Områdeskalkyler, 1989. Områdeskalkyler - skog. Norra Sverige. 1988-89. [In Swedish.] Konsultavdelningens rapporter, Allmänt 152, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
28. Roise, J.P. 1990. Multicriteria nonlinear programming for optimal spatial allocation of stands. For Sci. 36(3): 487-501.
29. Sessions, J. 1992. Solving for habitat connections as a Steiner network problem. For. Sci. 38(1): 203-207.
30. Sjoberg, K., and Lennartsson, T. 1995. Fauna and flora management in forestry. In Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries. Edited by M. Hytönen. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. pp. 191-243.
31. Snyder, S., and Revelle, C. 1996. Temporal and spatial harvesting of irregular systems of parcels. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 1079-1088.
32. Temple, S.A. 1985. Predicting impacts of habitat fragmentation on forest birds: a comparison of two models. In Wildlife 2000: modelling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Edited by J. Verner, M.L. Morrisson, and C.J. Ralph. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison. pp. 301-304.
33. Torres-Rojo, J.M., and Brodie, J.D. 1990. Adjacency constraints in harvest scheduling: an aggregation heuristic. Can. J. For. Res. 20: 978-986.
34. Yoshimoto, A., and Brodie, J.D. 1994a. Comparative analysis of algorithms to generate adjacency constraints. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1277-1288.
35. Yoshimoto, A., and Brodie, J.D. 1994b. Short- and long-term impacts of spatial restrictions on harvest scheduling with reference to riparian zone planning. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1617-1628
36. Zipper, W.C. 1993. Deforestation patterns and their effects on forest patches. Landscape Ecol. 8(3): 177-184.