Phylogenetic relationships among Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae) inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 8-17

  Smith, Paul T ^a,c   Kambhampati, Srini ^a   Armstrong, Karen A ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; PHYLOGENY; TEPHRITIDAE;

DACULUS; DIPTERA; TEPHRITIDAE; ZEUGODACUS;

EID: 0037216790     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00293-2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Archie, J.W., 1989. A randomization test for phylogenetic information in systematic data. Syst. Zool. 38, 219-252.
2. Armstrong, K.F., Cameron, C.M., Frampton, E.R., 1997. Fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species identification: A rapid molecular diagnostic technique for quarantine application. Bull. Entomol. Res. 87, 111-118.
3. Bremer, K., 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295-304.
4. Bull, J.J., Huelsenbeck, J.P., Cunningham, C.W., Swofford, D.L., Waddell, P.J., 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42, 384-397.
5. Clary, D.O., Wolstenholme, D.R., 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: Nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. J. Mol. Evol. 22, 252-271.
6. Cunningham, C.W., 1997a. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 733-740.
7. Cunningham, C.W., 1997b. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46, 464-478.
8. De Queiroz, A., 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42, 368-372.
9. De Queiroz, A., Donoghue, M.J., Kim, J., 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 657-681.
10. Drew, R.A.I., 1989. The tropical fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) of the Australasian and Oceanic regions. Mem. Queensl. Mus. 26, 1-521.
11. Drew, R.A.I., Hancock, D.L., 1994. The Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies in Asia. Bull. Entomol. Res. Suppl. Ser. 2, 1-68.
12. Drew, R.A.I., Hancock, D.L., 2000. Phylogeny of the tribe Dacini (Dacinae) based on morphological, distributional, and biological data. In: Aluja, M., Norrbom, A.L. (Eds.), Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 491-504.
13. Eriksson, T., 1998. AutoDecay, Ver. 4.0 (Program Distributed by the Author). Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
14. Faith, D.P., 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and non-monophyly. Syst. Zool. 40, 366-375.
15. Faith, D.P., Cranston, P.S., 1991. Could a cladogram this short have arisen by chance alone. On permutation tests for cladistic structure. Cladistics 7, 1-28.
16. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, S.M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10, 315-319.
17. Farris, J.S., Källersjö, S.M., Kluge, A.G., Bult, C., 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44, 570-572.
18. Felsenstein, J., 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
19. Han, H.-Y., McPheron, B.A., 1997. Molecular phylogenetic study of Tephritidae (Insecta: Diptera) using partial sequences of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1, 17-32.
20. Huelsenbeck, J.P., Bull, J.J., Cunningham, C.W., 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 152-158.
21. Kambhampati, S., Smith, P.T., 1995. PCR primers for the amplification of four insect mitochondrial gene fragments. Insect. Mol. Biol. 4, 233-236.
22. Kambhampati, S., Black IV, W.C., Rai, K.S., 1992. Random amplified polymorphic DNA of mosquitoes: Techniques, applications and statistical analyses. J. Med. Entomol. 29, 939-945.
23. Lyons-Weiler, J., 2001. RASA 3.0 Turbo for the Macintosh. Available from «http://bio.uml.edu/LW/RASA.html».
24. Lyons-Weiler, J., Hoelzer, G.A., Tausch, R.J., 1996. Relative apparent synapomorphy analysis (RASA) I: The statistical measurement of phylogenetic signal. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 749-757.
25. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2000. MacClade, Version 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
26. McPheron, B.A., Han, H.-Y., 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of North American Rhagoletis (Diptera: Tephritidae) and related genera using mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 1-16.
27. Mickevich, M.F., Farris, W.M., 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Zool. 30, 351-370.
28. Munro, H.K., 1984. A taxonomic treatise on the Dacidae (Tephritoidea, Diptera) of Africa. Entomol. Mem. S. Afr. Dept. Agric. 61, 1-313.
29. Muraji, M., Nakahara, S., 2001. Phylogenetic relationships among fruit flies, Bactrocera (Diptera, Tephritidae), based on the mitochondrial rDNA sequences. Insect. Mol. Biol. 10, 549-559.
30. Nixon, K.C., Carpenter, J.M., 1996. On simultaneous analysis. Cladistics 12, 221-241.
31. Page, R.D.M., 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12, 357-358.
32. Saitou, N., Nei, M., 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406-425.
33. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P., 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 651-701.
34. Smith, P.T., Kambhampati, S., Völkl, W., Mackauer, M., 1999. A phylogeny of aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) inferred from mitochondrial NADH 1 dehydrogenase gene sequence. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2, 236-245.
35. Smith, P.T., McPheron, B.A., Kambhampati, S., 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA supports the monophyly of Dacini fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. in press.
36. Swofford, D.L., 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), Ver. 4.0b6. Sinauer, Sunderland.
37. Tajima, F., Nei, M., 1984. Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1, 269-285.
38. Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J., Plewniak, F., Jeanmougin, F., Higgins, D.G., 1997. The CLUSTAL X windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 4876-4882.
39. White, I.M., 2000. Morphological features of the Dacini (Dacinae): Their significance to behavior and classification. In: Aluja, M., Norrbom, A.L. (Eds.), Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 505-533.
40. White, I.M., Elson-Harris, M.M., 1992. Fruit Flies of Economic Significance: Their Identification and Bionomics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
41. White, I.M., Hancock, D.L., 1997. CABIKEY to the Indo-Australasian Dacini Fruit Flies. CAB International, Wallingford, CD-ROM.