The template: A cooperative approach to evaluating community rehabilitation services

Journal of Rehabilitation

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 4-14

  Kuipers, Pim ^a   Quinn, Raymund ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; DISABILITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; REHABILITATION CENTER; SOCIAL WELFARE;

EID: 0037216199     PISSN: 00224154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bailey, D., & Koney, K.M. (1995). An integrative framework for the evaluation of community-based consortia. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 245-252.
2. Bailey, D.B., McWilliam, R.A., Darkes, L.A., Hebbeler, K., Simeonsson, R.J., Spiker, D. & Wagner, M. (1998). Family outcomes in early intervention: A framework for program evaluation and efficacy research. Exceptional Children, 64, 313-328.
3. Berkowitz, S. (1996). Creating the research design for a needs assessment. In R. Reviere, S. Berkowitz, C. Carter, & C.G. Ferguson (eds.). Needs assessment: A creative and practical guide for social scientists (pp16-31). Washington: Taylor & Francis.
4. Chow, C.W., Ganulin, D., Haddad, K., & Williamson, J. (1998). The balanced scorecard: A potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management. Journal of Healthcare Management, 43, 263-280.
5. Cox, R.J. (2000). Using programme logic models in evaluation: A review of the literature and the Spinal Outreach Team experience. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 115-120.
6. Dunn, J. (1997). Goal attainment scaling in the evaluation of a community based health services program in rural and remote Australia. Paper presented at the Evaluation: Equipping Communities and Governments Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
7. Farmer, R., Miller, D., & Lawrenson, R. (1996). Epidemiology and Public Health Medicine (4th ed.) London: Blackwell Science.
8. Hope, B.G. (1997). Performance measures for ongoing quality management of services. Paper presented at the Evaluation: Equipping Communities and Governments Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
9. Jaffer, R. (1993). Monitoring and evaluation of community based rehabilitation - Need for a participatory approach. In H. Finkenflügel (ed.) The handicapped community: The relation between primary health care and community based rehabilitation (pp. 51-64). Amsterdam: VU Press.
10. Johnston, M.V. (1991). Outcomes of community re-entry programs for brain injury survivors. Part 2: Further investigations. Brain Injury, 5, 155-168.
11. Keith, R.A. (1994). Outcomes evaluation in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Commentary. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75(12 Supplement), 27-28.
12. Kuipers, P., Foster, M., Bellamy, N., & Fleming, J. (2002). The incorporation of environmental variables in outcome measurement: A current challenge and future frontier. Paper presented at the 8th National Health Outcomes Conference, Canberra, Australia.
13. Lipsey, M.W., & Cordray, D.S. (2000). Evaluation methods for social intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 345-75.
14. Miles, S. (1996). Engaging with the disability rights movement: The experience of community based rehabilitation in Southern Africa. Disability and Society, 11, 501-517.
15. Moxley, D. P., Manela, R. W., & Finch, J. R. (2000). The role of evaluation in facilitating organisational change in rehabilitation agencies. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 24, 41-55.
16. Peat, M. (1997). Community based rehabilitation. London: Saunders.
17. Stilwell, P., Stilwell, J., Hawley, C., & Davies, C. (1998). Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: the Community Outcome Scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 521-531.
18. Stringer, E.T. (1996). Action research: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
19. Vargas, L. V. (1991). Reflections on methodology of evaluation. Community Development Journal, 26, 266-270.