Using programme logic models in evaluation: A review of the literature and the Spinal Outreach Team experience

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 115-120

  Cox, Ruth J ^a  

^a Spinal Outreach Team   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LOGIC; MODEL; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPIST; PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; THEORY;

EID: 0034072076     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260006300305     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Barr J (1995) The outcomes movement and health status measures. Journal of Allied Health, 24(1), 13-28.
2. Bickman L (1996) The application of program theory to the evaluation of a managed mental health care system. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(2), 111-19.
3. Crane A, Ginsburg S (1996) Evaluation in the health resources and services administration. Evaluation and the Health Professionals, 19(3), 325-41.
4. Davis G, Wanna J, Warhurst J, Weller P (1993) Public policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
5. de Clive-Lowe S (1996) Outcome measurement, cost-effectiveness and clinical audit: the importance of standardised assessment to occupational therapists in meeting these demands. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(8), 357-62.
6. Duckett S, Swerissen H (1996) Specific purpose programs in human services and health: moving from an input to an output and outcome focus. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(3), 7-17.
7. Dwyer J, Makin S (1997) Using a program logic model that focuses on performance measurement to develop a program. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 88(6), 421-25.
8. Guthrie J, English L (1997) Performance information and programme evaluation in the Australian public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(3), 154-64.
9. Hawe P, Degeling D, Hall J (1992) Evaluating health promotion. A health worker's guide. Sydney: MacLennan and Petty.
10. Holmes D, Teresi J, Ory M (1993) Serendipity and pseudoscience. A look at health-related program evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professionals, 16(4), 363-78.
11. Julian D (1997) The utilisation of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(3), 251-57.
12. Julian D, Jones A, Deyo D (1995) Open systems evaluation and the logic model: program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(4), 333-41.
13. Koch T (1994) Beyond measurement: fourth-generation evaluation in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20(6), 1148-55.
14. Letts S, Dunal L (1995) Tackling evaluation: applying a programme logic model to community rehabilitation for adults with brain injury. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), 268-77.
15. Lipsey M, Pollard J (1989) Driving toward theory in program evaluation: more models to choose from. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 317-28.
16. Lloyd-Smith W (1997) Evidence-based practice and occupational therapy. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(11), 474-78.
17. Mathie A, Greene J (1997) Stakeholder participation in evaluation: how important is diversity? Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(3), 279-85.
18. McKeon T (1996) Benchmarks and performance indicators: two tools for evaluating organisational results and continuous quality improvement efforts (benchmarking). Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 10(3), 12-17.
19. Nutbeam D (1996) Health outcomes and health promotion - defining success in health promotion. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 6(2), 58-60.
20. Ottenbacher K, Cusick A (1990) Goal attainment scaling as a method of clinical service evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(6), 519-25.
21. Papineau D, Kiely M (1996) Participatory evaluation in a community organisation; fostering stakeholder empowerment and utilisation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19(1), 79-93.
22. Rossi P (1997) Program outcomes: conceptual and measurement issues. In: E Mullen, J Magnabosco, eds. Outcomes measurement in the human services. Cross-cutting issues and methods. Washington: NASW Press, 20-34.
23. Rush B, Ogbourne A (1991) Program logic models: expanding their role and structure for program planning and evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 6(2), 95-106.
24. Ryan A (1992) Monitoring effectiveness in selected social policy programs. In: C O'Faircheallaigh, B Ryan, eds. Program evaluation and performance monitoring. An Australian perspective. Melbourne: Macmillan, 133-52.
25. Taylor M (1997) What is evidence-based practice? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60(11), 470-74.
26. Thompson J (1992) Program evaluation within a health promotion framework. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 83 (Supplement 1), S67-S71.
27. Unrau Y (1993) A program logic model approach to conceptualising social service programs. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 8(1), 117-134.
28. Van Beurden E (1994) HOOPS (health outcome orientated problem segmentation): a graphic framework for health promotion planning, program development and evaluation. Health Promotion Journal of Australia, 4(2), 4-8.
29. Wilkin D, Hallam L, Doggett M (1992) Measuring of needs and outcome for primary health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Winston J (1993) Performance indicators: do they perform? Evaluation News and Comment, 2(3), 22-29.