Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: The Community Outcome Scale

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 521-531

  Stilwell, Philippa ^a,b   Stilwell, John ^a   Hawley, Carol ^a   Davies, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b Lower Farm Cottage   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COMMUNITY CARE; COPING BEHAVIOR; FAMILY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; REHABILITATION CENTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031754412     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/026921598673761855     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tennant A, Geddes JML, Fear J, Hillman M, Chamberlain MA. Outcome following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 278-84.
2. Brooks DN. The effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 103-109.
3. Stilwell J, Hawley C, Stilwell P and Davies C. National Traumatic Brain Injury Study: Summary of report. London: Department of Health, 1998.
4. Cicerone KD, Smith LC, Ellmo W et al. Neuropsychological rehabilitation of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 1996; 10: 277-86.
5. Tennant A, MacDermott N, Neary D. The long-term outcome of head injury: implications for service planning. Brain Injury 1995; 9: 595-605.
6. Brisenden S. Independent living and the medical model of disability. Disabil Handicap Society 1986; 1: 173-78.
7. Johnson MV, Lewis FD. Outcomes of community re-entry programmes for brain injury survivors. Brain Injury 1991; 5: 141-54.
8. Aitken C, Baddeley A, Bond MR er al. Research aspects of rehabilitation after acute brain damage in adults: the report of a co-ordinating group. Lancet 1982; 6 November: 1034-36.
9. Whiteneck G, Charifue S, Gerhart K, Drew Overholser J, Richardson G. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 519-26.
10. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980: 42.
11. CIHI directions ICIS, Canadian Institute for Health Interventions, October 1996; 3.
12. Willer B, Corrigan JD. Whatever it takes: a model for community-based services. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 647-59.
13. Tappe MK. The model of personal investment: a theoretical approach for explaining and predicting adolescent health behaviour. Health Educ Res 1992; 7: 277-300.
14. http://www.who.ch/programmes/mnh/ems/icidh/ icidhtrg/sld025.htm.
15. Uniform Data Systems. The Functional Independence Measure. New York: State University at Buffalo, 1987.
16. Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, Zasler ND. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices: Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure, and Functional Assessment Measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993; 8: 60-74.
17. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361-70.
18. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81-84.
19. Russell WR, Smith A. Post-traumatic amnesia in closed head injury. Arch Neurol 1961; 5: 16-29.
20. Medical Disability Society. Report of the working party on the management of traumatic brain injury. London: Medical Disability Society, 1988.
21. Wong PP, Dornan J, Schentag CT, Ip R, Keating AM. Statistical profile of traumatic brain injury: a Canadian rehabilitation population. Brain Injury 1993; 7: 283-94.
22. Schalen W, Nordstrom G, Nordstrom CH. Economic aspects of capacity for work after severe traumatic brain lesions. Brain Injury 1994; 8: 37-47.