The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers

Brain and Language

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 562-565

  Litherland, J C ^a   Evans, A J ^a   Wilson, A R M ^a   Kollias, J ^a   Pinder, S E ^a   Elston, C W ^a   Ellis, I O ^a   Yeoman, L J ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 22644441489     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(96)80136-x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. NHS Breast Screening Programme Quality Assurance Guidelines for Surgeons in Breast Cancer Screening. Prepared by the National Co-ordination Group for Surgeons working in Breast Cancer Screening. NHSBSP Publication No 20. Revised November 1994.
2. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990;176:741-747.
3. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. Radiology 1991;180: 403-407.
4. Elvecrog EL, Lechner MC, Nelson MT. Nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation of stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy results. Radiology 1993;188:453-455.
5. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al. Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 1994;193: 359-364.
6. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-511.
7. Rubin E, Dempsey PJ, Pile NS et al. Needle-localisation biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. Radiology 1995;195:627-631.
8. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Bravetti P. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1989;173:57-59.
9. Fajardo LL, Davies JR, Wiens JL et al. Mammography-guided stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: prospective comparison with surgical biopsy results. American Journal of Roentgenology 1990;155:977-981.
10. Gisvold JJ, Goellner JR, Grant CS et al. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. American Journal of Roentgenology 1994;162:815-820.
11. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of impalpable speculated breast masses. American Journal of Roentgenology 1995;165:551-554.
12. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD et al. Impact of sterotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology 1995;195:633-637.
13. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 1991;181:745-750.
14. Parker SH. When is core biopsy really core? Radiology 1992;185:641-642.
15. Carty NJ, Ravichandran D, Cater C et al. Randomized comparison of fine-needle apiration cytology and biopty-cut needle biopsy after unsatisfactory initial cytology of discrete breast lesions. British Journal of Surgery 1994;81:1313-1314.
16. Sadler GP, McGee S, Dallimore NS et al. Role of fine-needle aspiration cytology and needle-core biopsy in the diagnosis of lobular carcinoma of the breast. British Journal of Surgery 1994;81:1315-1317.