Specifications for computer-aided conceptual building design

Design Studies

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 51-71

  Meniru, K ^a   Rivard, H ^a   Bedard C ^a  

^a Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Architectural design; Computer supported design; Conceptual design; Design research; Protocol analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER MONITORS; DRAWING (FORMING); PROBLEM SOLVING;

PROTOCOL ANALYSIS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 0037211476     PISSN: 0142694X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00009-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Howard H.C., Levitt R.E., Paulson B.C., Pohl J.G., Tatum C.B. Computer Integration: Reducing fragmentation in AEC industry. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 3:(1):1989;18-21.
2. Bédard C. Automating building design process with KBES. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 4:(2):1990;69-83.
3. Rivard H. A survey on the impact of information technology on the Canadian architecture, engineering and construction industry. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 5:May 2000;37-56.
4. Baya V., Leifer L.J. Understanding information management in conceptual design. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing design activity, Ch. 7. 1996;151-168 John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
5. Akin Ö. Psychology of architectural design. 1986;Pion Limited, London, UK.
6. Fazio P. A case study in integrated building design. Canadian Journal for Civil Engineering. 17:1990;636-642.
7. Bédard C., Gowri K., Fazio P. Integration in the building industry. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. 5:(5):October 1991;333-335.
8. Rush R.D. The building systems integration handbook. 1986;Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
9. Fricke G. Successful approaches in dealing with different precise design problems. Design Studies. 20:(5):1999;417-429.
10. Atman C.J., Chimka J.R., Bursic K.M., Nachtmann H.L. A comparison of freshman and senior engineering processes. Design Studies. 20:(2):1999;131-152.
11. Casakin H., GoldSchmidt G. Expertise and use of visual anology: Implications for design education. Design Studies. 20:(2):1999;153-175.
12. Dörner D. Approaching design thinking research. Design Studies. 20:(5):1999;407-415a.
13. Lipson H., Shpitalni M. 'Conceptual design and analysis by sketching' Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design. Analysis and Manufacturing. 14:(5):2000;391-401.
14. Purcell A.T., Gero J.S. Drawings and the design process. Design Studies. 19:(4):1998;389-430.
15. Goldschmidt G. On visual design thinking: The vis kids of architecture. Design Studies. 15:(2):1994;158-174.
16. McGown A., Green G., Rodgers P.A. Visible ideas: Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity. Design Studies. 19:(4):1998;431-453.
17. Gero J.S., McNeil T. An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies. 19:(1):1998;21-61.
18. Goldschmidt G. The dialectics of sketching. Design Studies. 4:1991;123-143.
19. Heylighen A., Neuckermans H., Bouwen J.E. Walking a thin line - between passive knowledge and active Knowing of components and concepts in architectural design. Design Studies. 20:(2):1999;211-235.
20. Cross N. The automated architect. 1977;Pion Ltd, London UK.
21. Cross N. Natural intelligence in design. Design Studies. 20:1999;25-39.
22. Goel V. Sketches of Thought. 1995;The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Verstijnen I.M., Hennessey J.M., van Leeuwen C., Hamel R. Sketching and creative discovery. Design Studies. 19:(4):1998;519-546.
24. Rodgers P.A., Green G., McGown A. Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies. 21:(5):2000;451-464.
25. Günther J., Ehrlenspiel K. Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic design education. Design Studies. 20:(5):1999;439-451.
26. Bhavnani S.K., Gharrett J.H. Jr. Leading indicators of CAD experience. Flemming U., Van Wyk S. CAAD Futures '93. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures:1993;313-334 Elsevier, New York.
27. Mazijoglou M., Scrivener S., Clark S. Representing design workspace activity. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing design activity, ch. 18. 1996;389-415 John Wiley & Sons, Christchurch, UK.
28. Dorst K., Dijkhuis J. Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing design activity, ch. 12. 1996;253-270 John Wiley & Sons, Christchurch, UK.
29. Newman W.M., Lamming M.G. Interactive System Design. 1995;Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
30. Holtzblatt K., Jones S. Contextual inquiry: a participatory technique for system design. Schuler D., Namioka A. Participatory design, ch. 9. 1993;177-210 Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
31. Laurel B. The art of human-computer interface design. 1990;Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA. pp. 85-90.
32. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Introduction: the Delft protocols workshop. Cross N., Christiaans H., Dorst K. Analysing design activity. 1996;1-16 John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
33. Eisentraut R. Styles of problem solving and their influence on the design process. Design Studies. 20:(5):1999;431-437.
34. Haptic Technologies, Inc. Technology for your fingertips Montreal, Canada. 1999.
35. Emkin, L.Z. 'Misuse of Computers by Structural Engineers: A clear and Present Danger' in N K Srivastava (ed) Structural Engineering World Wide. Proceedings of the Structural Engineering World Congress. Elsevier Science Ltd, San Francisco, July 19-23, 1998, Paper Reference: P331-3, 8 pages.